Feed on
Posts
Comments

“I am lost, adrift, stumbling through a world I do not understand.  I hear a rustle in the undergrowth and can’t decide if it’s a jaguar stalking with ominous restraint or an LBJ scratching for worms.  I find succulent globes of fruit but don’t dare touch them for fear of poison…. I hide from human voices, words I cannot understand.  I am as stupid as a child….”

Jenny Dunfree gets her first hint of some of the difficulties she will face during an ornithological research project in the San Blas Islands, off the coast of Panama, when the ticket agent at the airport refuses to sell her a one-way ticket.  Insisting that she does not want to return the following day, Jenny is unable to convince anyone at the airport that she will stay on Sugatupu for an extended period of time.  Her duties, funded by a foundation, are to study a nest of harpy eagles, a rare species, and keep notes on their behavior, their feeding habits, and any eaglets which may appear.  Excover seducing spirits2hausted when she finally makes her way to Sugatupu by canoe, she is immediately accosted by a young boy who drags her through the night-time forest to the village meeting house. There, she must list her genealogy for the village elders.  They do not want her name, just that of her family.  In fact, she is not allowed to tell her name, nor is anyone else allowed to ask it.  “Without a name, do I have a soul?  Am I a real person?” she wonders.

Jenny is expected to appear at the village meeting house every Saturday evening, without fail, though she does not speak the Kuna language of her Indian hosts, and most of them speak little or no Spanish.  Living as isolated as possible from the rest of Panama, the Kuna Indians have their own culture, thousands of years old, and the biggest influences (and some of their biggest problems) have come from missionaries who have wanted to change their beliefs about the world, impose a new system of morality, redefine the nature of good and evil, and educate the Kuna children in missionary schools away from the island.  They love nature and believe in a spirit world which includes all animals, plants, and even rocks, and they understandably resent the intrusions of those who would change their waysphoto louise young2 of life.  Before long, Jenny is making friends among some of the community’s male leaders, several of whom speak rudimentary Spanish, though the lives of the women, who remain at home all day working and taking care of the children, remain beyond her.

Because Jenny obviously appreciates nature, which is the basis of all the Kuna beliefs, she is watched over and often protected by the Kuna.  She has no knowledge of how to deal with the animals and snakes that she may have to face, and she is rescued on several occasions.  These islands have also been recognized as a dropping point for cocaine, and Jenny has become friends with a white man who sometimes shows up to chat with her, armed with a pistol.  As her research work continues, she becomes more and more convinced that the eagles that she is observing are not harpy eagles at all, a fact that could jeopardize the whole project.

Author Louise Young, herself an ecologist who began working in the San Blas islands in 1996, had intended this book to be a National Geographic-style travel piece in which she used the  vmap panama-sanblasislandsoice of an “armchair anthropologist,” but she says she eventually found that a fictionalized anthropological framework worked better.  “Fiction became my tool to muscle stick-figure stereotypes into the array of personalities that inhabit all human communities,” she says.  Her characters are, in fact, often stereotypes, but she succeeds in creating a broad picture of the Kuna culture she is depicting because the culture itself is so interesting.  It is twenty-five-year-old Jenny who is the biggest stereotype, a woman with an advanced degree who is depicted, primarily, as an over-emotional woman, and only secondarily as an ecologist, anthropologist, and scientist.  Jenny has no real understanding of her mission at the outset, and she often appears to be romantically attracted to a number of the village men, disregarding any sense of detachment about her supposed role.  She cries lobster-molaa   lot, frequently uses the kind of profanity common among young college students, smokes dope with visitors to her camp when she has the opportunity, and is “saved” on a regular basis by the men who feel the need to protect her.

Eventually, Jenny learns how to cook from the village women, observes their maturation ceremonies, experiences their healing practices, and learns about death and how they view it.  The novel becomes deeper as it progresses, and the reader’s fascination with the culture grows.  Ultimately, it is Jenny’s respect for the culture and beliefs which make the novel work.  Though it is clear that some aspects of the culture of these islands will inevitably change, the author’s own work there as a “cultural guide” and technical advisor to a women’s cooperative will help preserve the essence of their way of life.

Notes: The author’s photo appears on her Amazon Author page.

The map of Panama, showing the San Blas Islands on the Atlantic coast, is from:  www.tropicaldiscovery.com

The women of the San Blas Islands are famous for making molas, elaborate cutwork of abstract designs from nature, which they use on the front and back of their blouses.  The lobster mola, shown here, is from the Museum of Quilts and Textiles in San panama_sanblaslady3Jose.  Molas are made by piling up individual layers of colored cloth, in this case at least nine different layers:  “Working with only a razor or a small pair of scissors and a needle and thread, [the maker cuts through layers until she reaches the color  she wants, and then hems around it], creating some of the most intricate stitchery found anywhere on earth. She is never permitted to waste scarce material on trial and error methods, so she must submit to a very high level of discipline in her work from the start. The qualities, displayed on her body for all to see, are concrete evidence of her ability.”  www.turq.com

Author Louise Young, whose own quilt work is in museums, gives tours to the these islands.  www.molatour.com Her blog is here: www.redroom.com.

Personal note:  I have been to Panama, and I have seen these molas at crafts shows and fairs in Panama City,  They are extraordinary!  I have some that I bought fifteen years ago, and they are as beautiful today as the day I bought them.

“They were never bored with each other.  They might hate each other, at least, Irene might hate Gil, while he had no idea how much he hated Irene because he was so focused on winning back her love.  He really did hate her…He couldn’t see it or experience this hatred but it was there.”

In this relentlessly domestic novel about a failed marriage, Louise Erdrich changes her focus from grand themes and the on-going history of Native American cultures to a microscopic analysis of the interactions of two people who have failed, not just in their marriage, but in virtually all their other relationships.  Gil, a well-recognized, almost-great artist and former professor, is thirteen years older than Irene, who had been his student and model when she was in college.  Devoting virtually his entire career to paintings of Irene, he has depicted her from her almost-innocent cover shadow tagtwenties to her present life as a heavy-drinking mother of three who despises him for dominating and controlling every aspect of her life.  The more angry she has become and the more passionate she has been in her rebellion, the more dramatic Gil’s portraits of her have become, with a recent one selling for six figures.  Irene, who gave up her PhD studies when she married, is far more flexible, easy-going (and actually  irresponsible), than the controlling Gil, and it is she who is closer to the children, who range in age from thirteen to six.

Living in a three-story house in metropolitan Minneapolis, Gil and Irene lead a comfortable life, their three children all in private schools, and Irene with enough time to work on a new PhD thesis, this one on George Catlin, the American artist who traveled the west in the 1830s and 1840s making portraits of Native Americans from as many tribes as he could find.  Irene is three-quarters Native American;  Gil is 1/4 at most, yet both consider themselves Native Americans.  Both have grown up in families without fathers, in homes which have not stressed their culture, and neither seems to have developed any inner resources or community ties to help deal with the crises they face on a daily basis in their crumbling marriage.  Gil is strict, harshphoto erdrich, and even violent, with the children and with Irene;  Irene is emotionally unable to leave him, though she says she has not loved him for the past six years.  She finds solace in drink.

When Irene discovers that Gil has been reading the Red Diary she keeps in a file cabinet in her basement office, further proof of his need to control, she decides to take revenge, deliberately fabricating stories to shock and hurt Gil.  She also opens a safety deposit box in town and makes regular trips to it to write the truth in a Blue Notebook that she has deposited there.  Gil, who has always wondered where Irene goes when she is not at home, and suspects she is having an affair, soon becomes convinced not only of the affair but of the possibility that at least one of his children is not really his.  As the point of view rotates from the Red Diary through the Blue Notebook to the dramatic observations of a third person, the intensity of the conflict escalates, eventually revealing such intensely personal nastiness that the reader begins to feel uncomfortable, almost voyeuristic.

Erdriclucretia Rembrandth, as always, includes motifs and patterns throughout the novel which add to its significance, and here the use of shadow is pervasive.  Gil often escapes to the Minneapolis Institute of Art just to sit and contemplate a painting there by Rembrandt, the master of shadow. The painting is a fine, detailed portrait of Lucretia, who, according to Livy, chose death over dishonor when she was raped by the son of the ruler.  The portrait shows her in the process of disemboweling herself in front of her father and husband.  By contrast, the gift paintings given by various tribes to  Irene’s thesis subject, painter George Catlin, when he painted the chiefs, were all one-dimensional and contained no shadows at all.  Catlin himself, however, was told that he brought shadows to the tribes when their lives changed for the worse through the introduction of European inventions (and disease).  The differences in artistic preferences and styles are visual reminders of the differences in thinking and personality between Gil and Irene.   In the most obvious shadow symbolism, the family spends a Catlin ptg photomoonlit night outside in the snow playing shadow tag.  The lack of shadows is symbolic in the conclusion.

Whereas many other Erdrich novels soar with theme, this novel is firmly grounded in domestic torments and tribulations, created with such emotional intensity that I could not help wondering about the degree to which this novel might have sprung from Erdrich’s own marriage diffiulties.  Others have stated outright that the novel is semi-autobiographical.  The novel is hard to read, almost too personal, too open (and it would still feel that way even if it were completely fictional).  As the conflicts develop and emotions run high, the reader is constantly aware that there are many possibilities for ending the novel and resolving the difficulties in this marriage and family.  Erdrich’s choice of conclusion will disappoint many readers.

Notes: The photo of Louise Erdrich is by Dawn Villella of the Associated Press, and appears with a New York Times review of Louise Erdrich’s The Red Convertible, a story collection published in 2009.   www.nytimes.com/2009

Rembrandt’s “Lucretia” (holding the dagger in her right hand) is at the Minneapolis Institute of Art:  http://commons.wikimedia.org.

The George Catlin portrait is from the Nelson-Atkins Museum in Kansas City:  www.nelson-atkins.org.

For those interested in the autobiographical aspects of this novel, Salon has an article here about the marriage of Louise Erdrich and Michael Dorris:  www.salon.com/april97

Also by Erdrich:  LOVE MEDICINE ,      THE PAINTED DRUM,  and     THE PLAGUE OF DOVES

“War is within all men, regardless of their politics, regardless of their religion, regardless of their nationality, regardless of their race.  It is the abyss beneath all our skins, the abyss within all our skulls.  And once we have looked into that abyss…we are no longer human, we are only war, are only murder, only death.”

In this heart-thumping experimental novel which bursts the bounds of the usual genre categories, British author David Peace creates an impressionistic story of a real Tokyo bank robbery and the deaths of twelve bank employees on January 26, 1948.   A man representing himself as a doctor investigating a case of potentially fatal dysentery in the neighborhood appears at the Shiina-Machi branch of the Teikoku Bank just after closing cover occupied citytime.  He says he must inoculate all the employees in the bank against this disease and decontaminate all the documents and money that an infected man may have touched.  He explains how he will give each person two different medicines and shows them how to roll up their tongues for the first liquid so that the medicine will not hurt their teeth or gums.  After one minute, he gives them all the second liquid.  Two minutes after that, sixteen victims, writhing in agony, have fallen unconscious, and twelve of them die, poisoned with cyanide.  The physician then removes the day’s receipts and disappears.

As detectives investigate those who might have had access to cyanide, they follow a lead and pursue an artist who uses cyanide in making tempura paints–a man who already has a history of fraud.  The man is arrested and jailed, though a witness has stated unequivocally that he is not the killer.  Further investigation of this crime becomes an entree into the author’s wide-ranging study of Japan’s use of biological warfare in Manchuria, before and during World War II.  Cyanide was the subject of much research and experimentation there, and Pingfan Army Unit 731, the chemical lab unit, did extensive experiments, fully photo david peace4described here, under Gen. Shiro Ishii.  Any one of the Pingfan soldiers could have committed these murders, though Gen. Ishii himself has “lost his memory” about the people who worked for him in Pingfan.  Who was really responsible for the cyanide poisoning in the bank becomes a big question in the followup to the biological weapons investigation.   The reader quickly discovers  that officials on all sides and at all levels have colluded  in a cover-up about these weapons, and even the newspapers and reporters have been complicit.

The author uses a Rashomon-like structure for the novel, featuring twelve different narrators who provide information about the crime in the manner of a traditional Japanese ghost-story-telling game.  This game begins with the “shadows” of twelve narrators lighting candles together–a detective, a female survivor, an American physician, a practitioner of the occult who lives in a shrine, a journalist, a businessman/yakuza gangster, a Soviet investigator of war crimes, the man convicted of Teikoku_Bank2the murder, and others.  Each tells his own horror story regarding the bank robbery, after which he blows out his candle, creating a darker and darker atmosphere for the succeeding “Candles.”  When the final narrator blows out his candle, the participants are sitting in blackness, waiting for ghouls to appear and the abyss to open.

These characters all provide journals, notebooks, newspaper articles, police reports, letters, and individual testimony to build an archival record of the real story, which attests to the author’s comprehensive research during the many years he lived in Tokyo.  Despite the full background material, however, the novel is by no means straightforward or journalistic.  Instead, the author creates swirling images of the Occupation of Japan, developing kaleidoscopic impressions which change at warp speed.  The novel’s pace is driven by its language, which twists and turns in upon itself, echoes, and repeats phrases in parallels–more like music than prose in its style and emotional intensity.

Sometimes the novel feels like a long canon, or “round,” while at other times one can only think of a grand operatic chorus.  Sometimes four or five different speakers reveal information simultaneously (often within the same sentence).  Each speaks as if in a     soishii image2liloquy, talking over the other characters and interrupting their sentences to include his own thoughts.  It is a uniquely powerful technique which requires the reader’s  “willing suspension of literary expectations,” and it can be both exhilarating and challenging.  The author does not always distinguish between his real people and his ghostly shadows, and often a reader may be unsure who is speaking–or why–during these long “canons,” a sometimes frustrating experience.  And occasionally the language becomes so dense it suffocates the reader under its own weight.   A  remarkable section described as The Ninth Candle (“The Thirty-Six Wounds of a Second Detective”) contains “five acts” within the section–more an opera than a play or novel.  The cumulative effect of Peace’s complex and self-conscious technique may irritate those who are just looking for a good mystery, but the book contains many delights and is often thrilling for those who can ignore the uncertainties, appreciate the story and the history, and just enjoy the imaginative approach and broad thematic scope.

Notes: The author’s photo by David Sillitoe appears on www.serpentstail.com, which announces David Peace’s selection as GQ Writer of the Year in 2007.

The photo which shows the crowds gathered outside the Teikoku Bank in the aftermath of the killings appears on http://en.wikipedia.org

Gen. Shiro Ishii’s photo appears on www.sonicbomb.com

In an interview in The Scotsman, the author declares that after this book, which is his tenth, he will write only two more books.  Then he will retire.  http://thescotsman.scotsman.com

Two lucky winners of SMALL KINGDOMS have been chosen.  More information is given on the Raffle site:  http://marywhipplereviews.com/books/?p=13109

Thanks to all who participated!  I hope you will participate in the raffle for next month, which will be announced in a couple of weeks.  Mary

Those who grew up on the poetic translations of the Odyssey by Robert Fitzgerald and Richmond Lattimore will be surprised, to say the least, at this new version of the “lost books” of the Odyssey by Zachary Mason.  Both of those cover lost books odyssey2earlier translator/poets treat this epic as the monument of Greek culture that it has long been considered–a lengthy poem from three thousand years ago intended to be sung by traveling bards as a way of preserving their culture and religion.  In the opening of Fitzgerald’s memorable translation, for example, the bard calls on the Muse for help, praying:

“Sing in me, Muse, and through me tell the story
of that man skilled in all ways of contending,
the wanderer, harried for years on end,
after he plundered the stronghold
on the proud height of Troy.
He saw the townlands
and learned the minds of many distant men,
and weathered many bitter nights and days
in his deep heart at sea…”

Mason’s newly published version of this story, by contrast, takes a post-modernist approach–casual, playful, earthy, and even scatological. At one point in Mason’s version of The Lost Books of the Odyssey, Odysseus muses about the fact that “I photo mason3was ideally suited to be a bard, a profession fit only for villeins, wandering masterless men who live at the pleasure of their landed betters, as my father reminded me when I broached the idea.  He and his men would say things like, ‘We are here to live the stories, not compose them!’”  And then Odysseus imagines himself as bard, intoning “Sing, Muses, of the wrath of god-like shit-for-brains, hereditary lord of the mighty Coprophagoi [excrement eaters], who skewered a number of other men with his pig-sticker and valued himself highly for so doing,” a raw parody of the earlier, more poetic translations.

Using the traditional story of the Odyssey as his starting point, Mason gives his own take on various episodes from that epic, jumping around in time and place, changing major aspects of the story, adding new episodes, and providing unique points of view.  Odysseus is not an epic hero here.  Rather, he isscylla and charybdis an often arrogant man who loves killing, acts cruelly, and even makes mistakes, a real man whom Athena abandons for part of the narrative.

In Mason’s version of this epic, Odysseus himself vies for the hand of Helen, not Penelope, and has some success in winning her.  After the death of Achilles, Odysseus creates a golem of Achilles out of clay so that Achilles can keep fighting.  He tells the tale of Polyphemus, the giant, from Polyphemus’s point of view, that of a peaceful farmer who offers hospitality to the men whom he finds occupying his cave when he returns home, and the payment they give him.  Odysseus also marries during his twenty-year absence from Ithaca. Mason gives several different accounts of Odysseus’s return home (choose your favorite)–in one, Penelope is a “shade,” a ghostly presence whom he cannot touch. In another, she has given up waiting for him and found another husband.  At other times, she is described as still bedevilled by the suitors.  In yet another, Odysseus returns to find his entire city abandoned.

Even Homer himself appears in this novel, lying in a hammock and dreaming of finding a great book.  Odysseus, on the other hand, actually finds a copy of the odysseyMapIliad, written by the gods before the Trojan War, in Agamemnon’s cabin on the ship.  Gods and goddesses flit in and out, take the appearance of humans, play tricks, and have love affairs.  Tightrope walkers, Alexander the Great, and even the doctors and nurses of a sanatorium appear and disappear.

Though some reviewers say that knowledge of the “real” Odyssey is not a prerequisite to the enjoyment of this book, almost all the humor depends on that knowledge.  The ironies, absurdities, twists and turns, and shifts in point of view need the context of the original epic to have any meaning for the reader.  Lovers of postmodern fiction, with its abandonment of boundaries and its open, free-for-all attitudes will find much to love in this novel, which looks at the Odyssey through a new lens.

Notes: The author’s photo appears on www.fantasticfiction.co.uk.  On his Facebook page, Zachary Mason says:  “I’m currently the Shade Professor at Magdalen College, Oxford. I have ceased to sound very American, and I certainly don’t sound English – it seems that I am now from nowhere in particular. Luckily, I live half the year on a small island in the Greek archipelago, where no one speaks English well enough to detect my phonetic anomaly.”  (A “post-modern” bio?) His publisher says that he is a computer scientist specializing in artificial intelligence. He was a finalist for the 2008 New York Public Library Young Lions Fiction Award. He lives in California.”

The myth of Scylla and Charybdis is adapted by Amy Friedman and illustrated by Jillian Gilliland on their story-telling site  www.uexpress.com.

Scholars have long seen the Odyssey as a record of navigation in the Mediterranean three thousand years ago, and many maps of Odysseus’s journey have been created using the geographical clues from the text.  The map shown here appears on many sites and shows Scylla and Charybdis as the Strait of Messina between Sicily and Italy, Hades as part of Italy (sometimes identified on other maps as the smoking Bay of Naples), and the Land of the Lotus-eaters as Sardinia (with other maps claiming that North Africa is more likely, since a Libyan tribe known as Lotus-Eaters was known even in Homer’s time.)  The full-size image may be seen here:  http://tanya.lostroad.com

“Snap!…Click!–Just like that…It was as though his head were a five-shilling Kodak camera, and someone had switched over the little trigger which makes the exposure…But instead of an exposure having been made, the opposite had happened–an enclosure–a shutting down, a locking in…There was no sensation, but there was something to be done…Then he remembered:  he had to kill Netta Longdon.”

Described by the [London] Daily Telegraph as “a criminally neglected British author,” Patrick Hamilton wrote nine novels from the 1920s through the early 1950s, along with the famous dramas of Rope and Gaslight, and though he earned the admiration of a host of famous authors, from Graham Greene and Doris Lessing to Nick Hornby, he necover hangoverver achieved the popular success he deserved, either in his own time or throughout the twentieth century.  In this decade, however, virtually all his novels have been reprinted in both Europe and in the US, and he is finally beginning to be recognized for his astute observations about his times and for his insights into the minds of his characters.  Many of his novels contain autobiographical elements, and Hangover Square (1941), often considered his best novel, is no exception.   Seriously disfigured in an automobile accident when he was in his twenties, Hamilton became an alcoholic at an early age, and drinking to excess is a constant motif in his novels. A man who apparently wore his heart on his sleeve, he also developed passionate but unrequited attachments to beautiful women, in this case using actress Geraldine Fitzgerald as his model for Netta.

Indicating in the subtitle that this is “A story of darkest Earl’s Court,” Hangover Square is set in what was then a  seamy, low-rent district of London, a place in which those who were down on their luck, out of work, or homeless could manage to scrounge through life.  Bars and cheap entertainment venues provided evening activities for people who often did not get up before noon.  George Harvey Bone, pathamilton460the main character here, is out of work, his partner and best friend Bob Barton having closed the business to move to Philadelphia.  Like the other unemployed and under-employed people he associates with, he lives on the fringes of the entertainment business–part-time actors and actresses, managers, producers, and movie makers who party long and hard, their gaiety fueled by massive quantities of alcohol.  Each morning-after is spent in “Hangover Square.”   As one of George’s friends remarks, “If only you could have your morning-after first, and your night-before afterwards, the whole problem of drinking, and indeed of excess and sin in life generally, would be simplified or solved.”

George has an additional problem, however, one which has drawn the attention of the people he associates with.  His “blackouts,” which might, in some cases have been attributed to repeated over-indulgence, appear also to be psychotic episodes of schizophrenia.  More or leearls court flatsss accepted and glossed over by all of George’s associates as “dead moods,” these episodes have become more frequent and more serious in the past year.  Though George says he has had them all his life, they “had not been so frequent, so sudden, so dead, so completely dividing him from his other life.  They did not arrive with this extraordinary ‘snap.’”  Nor did they demand that he kill anyone.

Netta Longdon, a woman with whom George is obsessed, is a failed actress, a beautiful, spoiled, and manipulative woman who ignores George except when she wants money (not unlike Jenny Maples in his 1935 novel Twenty Thousand Streets under the Sky).   She sleeps around with his friends (though not with him) and uses him whenever she thinks she can get something.  To George, she “wore her attractiveness…pubpicture, earls courtas a murderous utensil with which she might wound indiscriminately, right and left.”  He is so desperate for her attentions, however, that he allows himself to be degraded, always hoping that she will see him for the person he really is.  His other self recognizes how merciless Netta is and has begun to demand, during George’s increasingly frequent “dead moods,” that he kill her in order to protect himself.

Though Twenty Thousand Streets Under the Sky (1935) is a broad sociological study of four people in the 1930s who interact at a bar called “The Midnight Bell,” Hangover Square is more intensely psychological, telling the story from the inside out, using George to channel the action and interpret it for us.  As he is driven closer to the edge and as his “dead moods” get closer together, the suspense grows.  “Getting killed would selaird cregar2rve her jolly well right,” he rationalizes.  “All her life she has had things too much her own way.”  Netta and her lover have subjected George to an emotional “death by a thousand cuts,” and his alterego has had enough.

The narrative line, which takes place inside George’s head, is strong and emotionally affecting, and though many contemporary readers will be frustrated at George’s passivity in the face of Netta’s abuse, few will fail to empathize.  Because the action is internal and does not lend itself easily to visual recording, however, the film of this novel, starring Laird Cregar and Linda Darnell bears virtually no resemblance to the novel.  In the film, George’s “dead moods” are an excuse to show close-ups of Cregar in almost Frankenstinian transformations, while the atmospheric and foggy townscapes bear little resemblance to the internal landscapes Hamilton has so carefully constructed in the novel.  The climax of the film bears no resemblance to the book at all, leading Hamilton himself to disown the film.  Hangover Square (the novel) is tight and intensely personal, psychologically astute for the period, and suspensefully developed.  The film is a horror show.

Notes: The photo of the flats in Earl’s Court (now gentrified) shows the density of this area and the number of residents possible in this relatively small neighborhood.  http://wapedia.mobi/en/Earls_Court

The pub photo is from www.yorkhouselondon.com

The last photo is of Laird Cregar, as George Harvey Bone in the film version of Hangover Square. Here’s a video clip.  Don’t worry about the “spoiler warning.”  (Nothing about this part of the film, which concerns itself with the similarities to Frankenstein, bears any resemblance to the novel!)   www.youtube.com Cregar, who starred here with Linda Darnell, died shortly after this film at the age of 31.

Actress Geraldine Fitzgerald’s obituary in the Guardian UK is here:  www.guardian.co.uk, citing the obsession of Patrick Hamilton with her.

Also by Patrick HamiltonTWENTY THOUSAND STREETS UNDER THE SKY

(January 30, 2010) –THE WINNERS HAVE BEEN CHOSEN!

One winner is Marlene L., who won on the basis of her selection of a date that came closest to the date I chose.  Her date was just two days away from my date, the birthdate of one of my grandchildren.

The other winner is Sandra S., who will post one or more reviews of the book on the internet.

Congratulations to both winners.  And many, many thanks to all who participated!  Please stay tuned for more raffles.  Another publisher has already offered two more books for next month.

____________________________________________________

GREAT NEWS!  The Permanent Press, publisher of Anastasia Hobbet’s terrific novel SMALL KINGDOMS, has just donated two hardback copies of the book for a raffle on this site!  The novel, set in Kuwait, is already on my list of favorites for the year, and it cover-small-kingdomshas also garnered raves and five-star ratings on Amazon.  My review is here:  http://marywhipplereviews.com/books/?p=12929

To participate, please do the following:
1.  Go to my review page for SMALL KINGDOMS and post a comment, indicating that you are interested in participating.  (Your post will not show because I’ve turned off the automatic posting mechanism to preserve privacy.)

2.  Please also indicate if you will be posting a review on Amazon in the US or any of its other sites, on Goodreads, ePinions, your own blog, or any other venue.  This is not a requirement for the raffle, but it does help this talented new author find new readers!

3.  At the end of your comment, post any date (Month, Day, Year) that means something to you.  I have also chosen a date, and the person who comes closest to my date will be an automatic winner of one of the books.  Winners will be announced on Jan. 30.

Please register only once.  Good luck to everyone!  It’s a thrill to offer copies of this book to readers.  Best, Mary

“In Iceland there’s rarely a real motive behind a murder.  It’s an accident or a snap decision, not premeditated, and in most cases committed for no reason.”

In the fourth of the Inspector Erlendur series, Gold Dagger Award-winner Arnaldur Indridasson creates a challenging and thought-provoking mystery by revisiting the political complexities of Iceland during the height of the Cold War in the 1970s and 1980s.  At this time, many Icelandic young people were resentful of the US presence and its huge naval air station in Keflavik, accusing the US of “spreading filth.”  While the US and NATO were using thiscover draining lake base for strategic defense against possible USSR aggression, many students, often from poor families, were accepting the chance to study in East Germany at the University of Leipzig, then returning home with their socialist and communist messages.

For Inspector Erlendur Sveinsson, busy solving contemporary crimes, this past history has not had any immediate importance, but when an earthquake leads to the unexpected draining of Lake Kleifarvatn through fissures in the crust beneath it, a skeleton, weighed down with a Russian transmitter, emerges from the depths, a large hole in its skull.  With no other evidence available, Erlendur’s only hope of identifying the remains rests with his investigation of missing persons from the late 1970s and 1980s.

Switching back and forth in time between Erlendur’s current investigation, and the lives, thirty years ago, of a group of Icelandic students in Leipzig, Indridason brings the past into the present by reopening old cases and re-interviewing the people involved.  When Erlendur visits a woman who was abandoned years ago by Leopold, the love of her life, Erlendur finds that she is still mourning his loss, but when he checks out Leopold, he can find no information–no passport, no photos, and no record of anyone by that name anywhere in Iceland.  When the point of view switches to that of an Indridason, Arnaldur photo2anonymous, now middle-aged ex-student who is living in contemporary Reykjavik, he tells us that he has often wondered whether the police would discover the truth about “the man in the lake,” consoling himself that everything happened so long ago that “what had happened no longer mattered.”

The students who went to Leipzig in the 1970s and 1980s discovered life there to be more difficult than they had imagined.  They were expected to report on each other as part of “interactive surveillance,” in addition to attending compulsory “social” meetings, doing a week’s hard labor as “volunteers” during the summers, promising not to listen to western radio broadcasts (punishable), and being followed and spied upon themselves.  Some gave up and left the university to return to Iceland.  Others became even more committed to their socialist and communist goals.  Some tried to remove themselves from their fellow countrymen, anxious to have privacy so they could just graduate and return home, while others enjoyed each other’s company, and even fell in love–until they began to become disillusioned by the constant surveillance and the harsh penalties for real and imagined crimes.

As the two plot lines evolve and begin to overlap, investigators Erlendur, Sigurdur Oli, and Elinborg reveal more about their own personal lives, becoming far morreykjavik photoe developed than they have been in this series up to now.  Erlendur, dour and seemingly unemotional, is still dealing with his drug-addicted children–daughter Eva Lind and son Sindri Snaer–his son now “clean,” and his daughter, who has suffered a miscarriage and undergone rehab, now back on drugs.  Soon Erlendur, who survived a traumatic divorce many years ago, begins a chaste friendship with a woman to whom he is strongly attracted, one of the few people with whom he feels comfortable enough to talk about the past.  An episode from his childhood, which he shares with his son, explains why he is so driven to investigate missing persons cases, and he begins to emerge as a “real human” with understandable complexities.  Sigurdur Oli and his wife also have issues which elicit the reader’s sympathy, while Elinborg adds a happier and sometimes comical note with the publication of her first cookbook.

Atmospherlendur photoeric and filled with the dark stories which envelop its numerous Icelandic characters, the novel reflects main character Erlendur’s terse style, his abbreviated dialogue, and his no-nonsense approach to life.  Author Indridason develops suspense about the old murder and its connection to the students from the outset and builds it carefully, as bits of information gradually arise in both the present and the past plot lines.  The point of view of the mysterious student who has talked about the murder at the beginning keeps the suspense high, and as all the students come to terms with the differences between their idealistic expectations and the reality of their lives in East Germany, their increasing desperation becomes understandable.  A first-class mystery set in an unusual time and place, with complications and plot twists far different from those of most other novels, The Draining Lake is an exciting continuation of this series and the characters who keep it fresh.

Notes: The author’s photograph appears on his Author page at www.randomhouse.com.au

The dramatic photo of snow-covered Reykjavik at dusk by Gavin Hellier appears on www.art.com and is available as a photographic print and as a poster.  It also appears here:  http://static.guim.co.uk

The final photo is of Ingvar E. Sigurdsson, the actor who plays Inspector Erlendur in the film of JAR CITY, the first of the Erlendur mysteries.  This film, entitled Myrin in Europe, was WINNER of the Grand Prix Award as Best Film at the International Film Festival in Valenciennes, France (2008).  The graphic trailer is here:   www.youtube.com.

An interview with the author appears here:  http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk

Also by Arnaldur Indridason:  JAR CITY

Note: J. G. Farrell was WINNER of the Booker Prize for The Siege of Krishnapur in 1973.

“Strong nations will always take advantage of the weak if they can do so with impunity.  This is a law of nature…They will see that their own interests are served.  No doubt life would be better if both nations and people were guided by principle rather than by self-interest but…it is not the case. It is foolish to pretend otherwise.”

When the Japanese invaded China in 1937 and French Indo-China in 1941, all part of Japan’s expansive efforts to establish the Greater East Asia Prosperity Sphere, the handwriting should have been on the wall for the colony of Singapore, one of Great Britain’s most important military and economic centers, located as it is, halfway between India cover singapore grip2and China.  Hubris, and the sense that their military power could not be realistically challenged, however, led to Britain’s lack of military preparedness and the astonishingly quick takeover of Malaya and Singapore by the Japanese in 1942,  handing the British what Winston Churchill called “the worst disaster and largest capitulation in British history.”  Author J. G. Farrell recreates these traumatic days in Singapore as the final novel in his “Empire Trilogy,” which, like TROUBLES (1970), about the Easter Rebellion in Ireland (1916) and THE SIEGE OF KRISHNAPUR (1973), about the Muslim Mutiny in India in 1857, combines Farrell’s cynicism, black humor, and sense of absurdity with his uncompromising honesty about colonialism–Britain’s greed, its colonial “mission,” its superior attitudes, and its cruelty toward the local people they consider their “subjects.”

The venerable Singapore merchant firm of Blackett and Webb and the family members who have run it at the expense of their workers come vibrantly alive here as they must deal with farrell photocontinuing strikes,  labor unrest in rural areas, challenges to the government coming from the communists, and the influx of immigrants from other countries who raise the “threat” of a “melting pot” culture.   The outbreak of war in Europe has made the demand for Blackett and Webb’s rubber supplies a high priority for Britain’s military cars and planes (not to mention commercial uses), and Blackett and Webb are poised to capitalize by manipulating prices, withholding product, attempting to form a monopoly, and evading the law as they cut down good trees in order to keep prices high, claiming the replanting costs against profits.  The families’ personal fortunes and personal prestige  are more important to them than the future of the war effort, however patriotic they regard themselves.  Associating with generals, the leaders of society, and local governors, the company’s representatives are busy planning their elaborate jubilee celebration.  Even as the Japanese are attacking from the north, Walter Blackett continues with the jubilee parade preparations, while also trying to arrange the perfect commercial marriage for his daughter Jopre-war singapore imagean.

Farrell has obviously spent a great deal of time researching not only the actions of the military and diplomatic corps from several countries, including the US and Australia, but also determining the personalities of the British characters (real) who act within the novel.  Air Chief-Marshall Sir Robert Brooke-Popham (an old soldier remembering the good old days of World War I) and Lt. Gen. Arthur Percival (who seems unable to act during the emergency) have innumerable scenes which establish their attitudes and explain their actions–and inactions.  In a surprise, Farrell also includes scenes in which the Japanese reveal their own points of view as officers Kikuchi, Matsushida, and his assistant Nakamura, prepare for the battle for Singapore.

Throughout the novsmoke singapore imageel, Farrell handles innumerable plot lines (and battle lines) with assurance and historical accuracy, illustrating the reality of history within the context of the everyday lives of the not-very-sympathetic merchant princes of Singapore.  Many of the younger characters, like young Matthew Webb, the heir to half the firm, are naive, and his previous background working for the Committee for International Understanding, a group associated with the League of Nations, has not prepared him for the cutthroat dealings of Blackett and Webb on the world stage.  His attraction for a Eurasian woman is genuine, though his expectations are unrealistic.  Walter Blackett’s daughter Joan, on thejap_tank_in_orchard_rd_singapore_ww2_op_640x439 other hand, trained by her father, is the consummate manipulator, a woman who will do anything to advance her own (and her family’s) greater wealth.  Her brother Monty Blackett is a fool, so out of touch that in any other society he would be summarily dismissed as irrelevant.

As the Japanese come closer to attacking Singapore, the reader is stunned by the reactions of some members of the British community, concerned primarily that “the dignity of the British Government is at stake,” not with the real lives that are threatened.  Others prefer to ignore the danger completely.

As Japanese bombs fall on the city and tanks roll down Orchard Rd., Singapore falls.   The horrors are dramatic, revealing the inner resources–or the failures–of all the main characters,Surrender_Singapore and as these escape from Singapore–or fail to escape–it is sometimes difficult to decide whether to be glad or sad about the fates of the characters we have followed for about five hundred pages.  Ultimately, Farrell’s own progressive world view shines through brightly, illuminating the problems of colonialism and its self-centered adherents.

Notes: The photo of J. G. Farrell is from http://goodbooksguide.blogspot.com

Photo 2:  Pre-war Singapore, from www.communigate.co.uk.

Photo 3: The first bombs hit Singapore in 1942, from http://history.sandiego.edu.

Photo 4: Japanese tanks rumble down Orchard Rd in February, 1942.:  http://britishbattles.homestead.com A poignant touch, visible in the full size photo (scroll all the way to the bottom of the link), is a billboard in the background advertising Ovaltine.

Final photo:  On Feb. 15, 1942, Lt Gen. Arthur Percival, carrying the Union Jack, is led by a Japanese officer to negotiate the surrender of Allied forces in Singapore.  It was the largest surrender of British-led forces in history.  http://commons.wikimedia.org

Also by J. G. Farrell: TROUBLES and    THE SIEGE OF KRISHNAPUR

Hilary Mantel–WOLF HALL

Note:  Hilary Mantel was WINNER of the Man Booker Prize for this novel in 2009.

“Thomas Cromwell…is an ingenious man…He is the very man if an argument about God breaks out; he is the very man for telling your tenants why their rents are fair.  He is the man to cut through some legal entanglement that’s ensnared you for three generations, or talk your sniffling little daughter into the marriage she swears she will never make.  With animals, women and timid litigants, his manner is gentle and easy; but he makes your creditors weep.”

Hilary Mantel has never “written the same book twice,” a writer of literary fiction who is so versatile and original that she defies genre.  Though this novel is a thorough and detailed look at the British court and its players from 1529 – 1535, it is so different from the traditional “historical novel” in its themes, massive scope, detailed character cover wolf halldevelopment, careful research, and lack of romance that it becomes its own genre, closer to fictionalized biography than to the blood and thunder bodice-rippers that sometimes characterize “historical fiction.”  This novel is realistic, with no compromises of actual history for the sake of story, but it succeeds in being lively, often humorous, filled with exciting scenes, and peopled with fascinating characters from Henry VIII to Sir Thomas More and Thomas Cromwell.

In an unusual twist, Mantel turns history as it has been depicted in other literature of this period on its head.  Sir Thomas More, the saintly subject of A Man For All Seasons, is shown here to be rigid, inflexible;  Thomas Cromwell, often depicted as the evil scourge of More, is, instead, something of a hero here.  There is no sense that Mantel is at all concerned with revisionist history, just that she, on the basis of her own reading and research sees the lives of these characters through an equally clear but different prism, reading their characters and motivations based on their actions as she interprets them.

Mantel Luke McGregor ReutersThe novel opens in 1500, with the brutal beating of Thomas Cromwell, then fifteen, by his father, a blacksmith and brewer, who has abused him severely just “because he can.”  The action then moves forward immediately to 1527. Thomas is now a lawyer in his forties working for Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, the Lord Chancellor, having spent many years working in Europe, where he came into contact with the banking establishment of Florence and the workings of the papacy.  Wolsey’s primary duty, assigned to him by King Henry VIII, is to find a way to annul his marriage to Katherine of Aragon, who has lost six sons and is now too old to give him a male heir.  Henry has already had a number of mistresses and has settled on the young Anne Boleyn, sister of one of his previous mistresses, as a future bride, someone who might produce a son for him.  The machinations of the court, the clergy, the kings of Europe, and Henry and his advisors are complex as they vie for power on an international scale, try to manipulate Pope Clement and his papacy, plot to outmaneuver each other, form the most influential alliances, and try to stay in power in their own lands as thcromwell picturee Reformation looms.

Mantel manages to create intimate stories within this grand scale, making Cromwell a sympathetic hero for much of the novel as he loses much of his family to the “sweating sickness” (plague), informally adopts several young non-family members who need a patron and guide, tries to do well by Cardinal Wolsey and acts to protect him as much as possible when he is dismissed by the king.  “How did it come to this?” Cromwell wonders.  “My lord [Cardinal Wolsey] kneeling in the dirt.  How could it happen?  How in the world?”  The reader soon sees the reasons in detail, participating in the trial details regarding Katherine’s marriage to Henry VIII as Wolsey argues unsuccessfully on behalf of Henry before the papal legate, Cardinal Campeggio.  The seriousness of the loss is obvious from the fate of Wolsey, and Cromwell, whose fate has been tied to Wolsey’s, must scramble to preserve his own place in Parliament where he might be able to argue against any actions they might introduce there against Wolsey.  When CroAnneboleyn2mwell eventually becomes the king’s chief minister in 1532, he manages to find a way to get Henry’s marriage annulled, and the rest, of course, is history.  The novel ends while Cromwell is still acting for Henry, helping in the dissolution of monasteries, and does not suggest his own eventual fate.

A novel dealing with issues as complex as these cannot be dealt with in any small way, and Mantel takes the time and space she needs to develop the issues clearly while also giving depth to her characters.  The list of chapters at the beginning gives the dates of the actions and helps prevent confusion, and a cast of characters, organized by the places in which the characters live or work, clearly identifies their alliances and allegiances.  A genealogical table of the Tudors and of the Yorkist claimants to the throne helps keep the royal succession in perspective.  A serious analysis of British history, as well as a novel of immense scope and detail, Wolf Hall is a monumental achievement on every level.

Notes: The photo of Hilary Mantel at the Booker Awards ceremony is by Luke McGregor of Reuters.

The Hans Holbein portrait of Thomas Cromwell (ca 1533) shows Cromwell wearing the turquoise ring given to him by Cardinal Wolsey during the time of this novel.  If you click on this link, you will be able to see a larger picture with the ring more clearly noticeable.  www.hans-holbein.org

The Anne Boleyn portrait by an unknown painter is on her Wiki page.

Also by Hilary Mantel:  EIGHT MONTHS ON GHAZZAH STREET

A joint Canadian/Irish TV series of THE TUDORS has been running for three years (28 episodes so far), with season four to start in April 2010.  http://en.wikipedia.org

Older Posts »