Feed on
Posts
Comments

Jane Austen–PERSUASION

“She had been forced into prudence in her youth, she learned romance as she grew older: the natural sequence of an unnatural beginning.”

Anyone who loves the writing of Jane Austen cannot help but hope that this quotation from her last completed novel reflects her own life (1775 – 1817).  Certainly Persuasion is a romantic novel, but in her depiction of main character Anne Elliot, Jane Austen also reflects a kind of freedom–and a confidence in her own sense of direction–that one does not find in her earlier, more mannered novels.  Perhaps the book seems “freer” because she was ill and had less opportunity to revise and make her plots and characters conform exactly to the moral certitudes and the rigid codes of behavior of her day, but she also subjects some of her “overly proper” characters here to repeated scorn, and she celebrates honesty and the ability to see reality in less mannered ways.

Anne Elliot, age twenty-seven as the book opens, is an older than usual heroine for Austen.  As a very young woman, she had been deeply in love with Frederick Wentworth, a handsome young naval officer of no fortune and uncertain prospects who loved her deeply.  The two became engaged, but Lady Russell, acting on behalf of Anne’s deceased mother, persuaded Anne to break off her engagement, convincing her that Wentworth could never be happy within their elegant family or make her happy, since she would be an outcast from the family and from the society she had always known.  Anne has forever regretted the fact that she allowed herself to be persuaded, and for the past eight years has not been attracted to anyone else, turning down a marriage proposal which had been regarded as ideal.   When Sir Walter Elliot, in dire financial straits, decides to lease Kellynch to Admiral Croft and remove the family to Bath, Anne has no idea that this will bring Frederick Wentworth back into her life.  Wentworth is the brother-in-law of Admiral Croft, who has moved into Kellynch.

Wentworth, now a captain who has made a fortune during the Napoleonic Wars, gradually re-enters Anne’s life, though each tries to ignore the other because of their past sad relationship.  Wentworth soon appears on the verge of becoming engaged to someone else, while William Elliot is paying court to Anne.  Numerous other characters introduce complications and help develop Austen’s theme of “persuasion”–one character becoming seriously injured when she cannot be persuaded out of taking a huge, physical risk:  she insists that she is going to do what she wants to do–that she is a strong person with a strong will.  Unfortunately, the girl has little sense.

Though Anne has always regretted that she allowed herself to be “persuaded” to give up the love of her life at age nineteen because his prospects did not meet the requirements of her status-conscious family, but she now thinks for herself, while still trying to recognize her responsibilities to others.  She is repeatedly embarrassed by the behavior of her older sister Elizabeth and her father as they try to ingratiate themselves with distant cousins Lady Dalrymple and her daughter;  she resents her family’s criticism of her because she, “a lady” and an Elliot,  might have been seen entering the home of Mrs. Smith, a friend from school, who lives in a poor neighborhood.  She distrusts the motives of her cousin William Elliot, the supposed heir to the Elliot family home, Kellynch Hall, a man who has given the impression that he is interested in marrying her.  For some members of the family and some of her friends the engagement is a foregone conclusion.  William Elliot, however, was once persona non grata in the family because he married a wealthy woman far “beneath” him (now deceased), but he has, in a turnabout, suddenly been welcomed into the family now that Sir Walter, Anne’s father, is in financial straits.  Anne is concerned about William’s motivations and does not trust him.

As in all Austen novels, the course of true love never runs smooth among any of the several budding relationships, but by the end, the expected engagements occur among Anne’s social set, though not necessarily among the characters one would have expected.  Throughout all the romantic entanglements, Austen keeps Anne Elliot front and center, a voice of reason and good sense when the situation calls for it, yet a woman who, having made a total commitment of her love to Frederick Wentworth years ago, will never be persuaded to settle for less.

This novel is even more feminist than Emma, as Anne has much more freedom to move around the town and countryside and to explore her intellectual interests.  Having been persuaded to do something against her will at age nineteen, Anne has taken heart from that lesson.  She will never allow this to happen again.  When she and Wentworth finally have a chance to open their hearts to each other, the conclusion becomes a celebration of the importance of a good person like Wentworth who has made his own fortune, and a veiled criticism of the artificial status given to birth and blood in English society.  Austen recognizes the changes which have begun in England as a result of the Industrial Revolution and she reflects the beginnings of romanticism which parallel it.  The paralyzing social expectations have started to change, and Anne Elliot and Frederick Wentworth are poised to participate in those changes.

Notes: As is obvious, many film productions, including two by the BBC, are available for this novel.

Also reviewed here:  MANSFIELD PARK, LADY SUSAN, and EMMA.

“Two vanishing races…the Boston Brahmin and the pure Hawaiian.”

When Bostonian John Quincy Winterslip is sent to Hawaii to retrieve his elderly Aunt Minerva, who has stayed with relatives in Hawaii long past the time she (and they) had originally intended, he fully expects to return home quickly. Though his family tree has long had “wanderers,” one of whom has settled in Hawaii, John Quincy knows HE is far too sensible to succumb to Hawaii’s charms. His Boston Brahmin roots, his successful investment business, and his “appropriate,” family-approved fiancee are all luring him back home.

Shortly after his arrival in Honolulu, however, his uncle Dan Winterslip, with whom he is staying, is murdered in his Waikiki home. Assigned to investigate this murder is Honolulu Detective Charlie Chan.

Earl Derr Biggers

First published in 1925, the House Without a Key broke new ground in American publishing by starring an Asian detective. Charlie Chan is clever and thoughtful – and he is also committed to maintaining his own culture, not simply “passing” in the ha’ole world which has dominated Honolulu ever since American Sanford Dole and the “sugar barons” inspired the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy in the 1890s. Like most of the kama’aina (new residents) who have come to Hawaii since then, the Winterslips are somewhat arrogant, believing themselves entitled to privileges not accorded to native Hawaiians and those of other races.

As the investigation unfolds, author Earl Derr Biggers creates a vibrant picture of Honolulu in the 1920s, contrasting it, on several occasions with earlier, less complicated, city life – before the army, navy, and merchant marine turned Honolulu into a busy port filled with foreigners and new residents. Definitely not hard-boiled in his style, he celebrates Hawaii in all its tropical splendor – its beaches and soft moonlight, its glorious flowers and lush growth, its warm and sensitive people, and its multicultural ambience.

Some inherent racism, seen here on the part of the Winterslips when they meet Charlie for the first time, reflects the times. Biggers is more culturally sensitive than most other writers of the period, however, and in Charlie Chan he creates a unique “hero” who goes on to star in five more novels after this.

The murder investigation is surprisingly complex, and the mystery and suspense are fully developed. The narrative speeds along and keeps the reader completely absorbed. Though Biggers did not intend his novel to be read as a satire, his Boston Brahmin characters, read in the present day, however, are so extreme in their belief that Boston is the center of the universe that modern readers will chuckle, if not laugh out loud, at their sometimes absurd dialogue and behavior. Loads of fun to read, this mystery is surprisingly modern in its complex structure, with a unique and charming hero in Charlie Chan.

Notes: Though only six Charlie Chan novels were written, many popular “Charlie Chan” films were made starring this wonderful character.

“Whatever happens in a house, robbery or murder, it doesn’t matter, you must have your breakfast.”

From the outset, Wilkie Collins’s 1868 “sensation novel” keeps the reader entertained and engaged as a priceless yellow diamond, stolen from a Hindu religious statue of the Moon God in India in 1799, works its black magic and controls the action. Rachel Verinder, heir of Colonel John Herncastle, who murdered to obtain the jewel during the battle of Seringapatam, inherits this possibly cursed treasure on her eighteenth birthday in 1848, only to have it vanish before she can put it into the bank.

Drawing on sensational details–three Indian “jugglers” who approach the house to perform a juggling act, the disappearance of the jewel from an Indian cabinet during the night, the certainty that the theft was an inside job, a housemaid with a criminal past, and a paint smudge on night clothing–Collins creates a haunting atmosphere and builds suspense.

Telling the story is Gabriel Betteredge, the house steward, a man who has been asked to set down his recollections by Franklin Blake, who was present in the house at the time of the jewel’s disappearance, and who is in love with Rachel Verinder. Betteredge is a delightful story-teller, providing details, humor, and suggestions about what happened with a conscientiousness that makes him a reliable narrator. As the story becomes more involved and the characters take on lives of their own, other narrators take up the story where Betteredge leaves off and provide new information.

The second narrator, Miss Drusilla Clack, Rachel Verinder’s cousin, is a “poor relation” who is also a religious fanatic, and her commentary and her behavior provide some of the funniest moments in Victorian literature. Collins’s use of humor, in fact, is one of the ways in which he surpasses his friend, Charles Dickens, in keeping an audience entertained. Franklin Blake, rejected by Rachel, provides additional commentary about the events, as do a doctor and his assistant, a local police sergeant and his investigator, the family lawyer, and a traveler to India.

The use of multiple points of view is one of the great advances Collins makes in the history of the novel. The fact that this is widely regarded as the first of the great mystery novels (though not dependent on a single detective) is another plus.

Overall, the novel is surprisingly modern in its ability to appeal to a wide audience. Collins is adept at manipulating his readership and in keeping suspense high. His characters are often engaging and frequently humorous, and in its ability to deal with social issues of the day, the novel provides pertinent commentary about colonialism, religious fanaticism, and class issues. Collins never forgets, however, that he is writing to entertain, and in this he succeeds admirably.

Notes: A Masterpiece Theater production of this novel is available.

Also reviewed here:  THE WOMAN IN WHITE

“Make ’em laugh, make ’em weep, make ’em wait, and make ’em come back.”

This advice for writing serial romances, alternately attributed to Wilkie Collins, Charles Dickens, and Charles Reade, is epitomized in this 1860 novel by Collins, a story of thwarted love, a marriage of obligation, claims on inheritance, the victimization of women, and, most of all, engaging mystery. Collins, often credited as the father of the mystery genre, creates a fast-paced story of Victorian England, revealing much about Victorian society and its values–the role of women, the laws governing marriage and inheritance, the social institutions of the day, the contrasting attitudes toward the aristocracy and the lower classes, and even the level of medical care and the treatment of psychological illness.

When drawing master Walter Hartright is on his way to teach Marian Halcombe and Laura Fairlie at Limmeridge House, in Cumberland, England, he meets a “woman in white,” a young woman who knows Limmeridge House well because she was mentored by Mrs. Fairlie, Laura Fairlie’s deceased mother. The “woman in white” is Anne Catherick, who looks just like Laura, but who is an escapee from a nearby mental asylum. Upon his arrival at Limmeridge House, Walter immediately falls in love with the beautiful Laura, but she has made a deathbed pledge to her father to marry to Sir Percival Glyde, someone Anne Catherick despises and blames for her own incarceration. Throughout the novel, Anne visits various characters to offer help in combating Sir Percival and his cohorts.

The story unfolds through documents held by a variety of characters, each of whom tells the story from his/her own point of view. The reader develops sympathy for the innocent and beautiful Laura, respect for her homely but bright half-sister, Marian Halcombe, sadness for Walter Hartright, and hatred for Sir Percival and his friend, the Italian count Fosco, with whom Sir Percival is in business. Sir Percival and the count need financing, and it is Laura’s inheritance that is at stake. A series of consecutive disasters, along with arguments, revelations of abuse, the fear of exposure, and the contemplation of murder by Sir Percival and Count Fosco, draws the reader irrevocably into the action.

The characters are sympathetically drawn, with Collins showing an early awareness of the influence of psychology on behavior. The descriptions of nature, presented realistically and in minute detail, build suspense, as Collins creates parallels between nature and the details of plot. As is usually the case with romances, chance plays a huge role in the unfolding action, creating cliff-hanging suspense which contributes to the excitement–and pure fun–of this seductive novel. The conclusion, involving a subplot unrelated to the primary action, resolves issues conveniently. The almost-forgotten author of twenty-five novels, Collins was one of the most successful authors of Victorian mysteries, and he is gaining new attention as a result of reprints of this novel and The Moonstone.

Notes: A Masterpiece Theatre production of this novel (last photo)  is available.

Also reviewed here:  THE MOONSTONE

Joseph Conrad–NOSTROMO

“Costaguana will always be run by butchers and tyrants.”

Often regarded as Conrad’s masterwork, Nostromo, written in 1904, is also Conrad’s darkest novel, filled with betrayals at all levels and offering little hope for man’s redemption. A novel of huge scope and political intrigue, it is also a novel in which no character actually wins. All must accept the ironies which fate has dealt them.

Setting the novel in the imaginary South American country of Costaguana, the story centers around a silver mine in the mountains outside of the capital, Sulaco, vividly depicting its allure and the price each character pays for its success.

When Charles Gould, returns from England to claim and reopen the rich silver mine he has inherited from his father, he has good intentions– to provide jobs for the peasants and contribute to the economy of the town at the same time that he also profits. Soon, however, he becomes obsessed with wealth and power, and as the political climate gets hotter, he must pay off government officials, bandits, the church, and various armed revolutionaries to be able to work.

Each of these groups is vividly depicted as working for its own ends and not for the good of the people, and with their goals focused on the real world, these characters have no self-awareness, nor do they develop it during the novel.

In contrast to these “unrealized” humans, Conrad presents several characters who develop some self-awareness through their experiences. Nostromo, a local legend, is a man of principle who has always kept his word. Martin Decoud, a newspaper man, is a nihilist who has editorialized against the revolution, though he has yet to test himself. Dr. Monygham, captured during a past revolution, broke under torture, and is now seeking absolution by fighting against this revolution. And the good and long-suffering wife of Charles Gould, Dona Emilia, who has lost her husband to his silver mine, now devotes her life to helping others.

When Nostromo agrees to protect a load of silver from revolutionaries by taking it out to sea, he takes Decoud with him, leaving him on an island with the silver when they almost sink. Decoud’s reaction to his isolation, and Nostromo’s reaction to the treasure that is suddenly “his,” provide a dark commentary on idealism and human nature.

In the conclusion, which includes a love story that feels tacked on, Conrad’s darkest self is revealed, offering little hope of change and even less hope for man’s redemption. Rich in atmosphere, vibrant in description, filled with characters representing all walks of life and philosophy, and set in a country where revolution is a way of life, the novel is full of dark portents and bleak political outcomes.

Notes: A very good BBC production of this novel is available.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »