Feed on
Posts
Comments

“Onwards and outwards the news of Barry’s death spread, radiating, halo-like, from those who had been at the hospital. Onwards and outwards as far as Yarvil, reaching those who knew Barry only by sight or reputation or by name….In places, Barry himself was lost behind the nature of his ending, and he became no more than an eruption of vomit and piss, a twitching pile of catastrophe.”

This passage from the opening of J. K. Rowling’s latest novel provides a hint of the style changes to come in this, her first “novel for adults.” Focusing on life in the very small community of Pagford, perhaps similar to the small communities Rowling herself grew up in as a child in Gloucestershire, Rowling emphasizes the pettiness, the rivalries, the back-biting, and the cruelties of “ordinary” life as people try to cope with the messiness of existence as it unfolds. There is no magic here to offer any hope of change, no wizard to sweep down and offer aid, either to the characters or to the reader, and as the action progresses, with its focus on the unpleasant and often violent aspects of many lives, the reader is forced to examine the elements of chance which can devastate everything that one might dream of.

Barry Fairbrother, a banker in his early forties, dies of an undiagnosed aneurism at the outset of the novel, a victim of a genetic defect. He leaves behind a wife and four children– and creates a “casual vacancy” on the Parish Council, which governs the community. Sixteen Council members deal with a variety of community issues, one of the most pressing being the proposal to separate an area of Pagford called the Fields from the rest of this picturesque community and make it the responsibility of Yarvil, the more industrialized community which is its neighbor. A second issue involves the closure of a drug rehab facility located near the Fields, from which most of its clients are drawn. These clients are a financial and social burden for Pagford, since they vandalize bus stations, streetlights, footpaths, and public seating, all of which must be maintained by Pagford. The Field residents in their barely habitable low-cost housing are also viewed as belonging to a completely different social class – lower economic level, less education, less sense of social responsibility, and somehow less worthy of the efforts by Pagford’s citizens.

These two external issues are as divisive within the community as one would expect such issues to be. The head of the Parish Council, Howard Mollison, has long been a rival of the deceased Barry Fairbrother. Mollison, the owner of a delicatessen and restaurant, wants to split off the Fields and close the rehabilitation center, while Fairbrother sees opportunities for change and hope. The likely votes on these issues will be very close. As a result Mollison is hoping to fill the vacancy on the council with a hand-picked candidate who will support his own point of view.

Rowling introduces over thirty characters in the first fifty pages of the book, providing enough brief but specific descriptions for each character to participate in the plot which quickly unfolds on several levels of simultaneous conflict. Husbands and wives fight, spouses fight with their lovers, children and parents fight, teenagers fight with each other (sometimes resorting to bullying on the internet), teenagers fight with teachers, and two children fight simply for survival. The issues relating to the “casual vacancy” on the Council create even more conflict.

As the action develops, several people already on the council are hounded to resign after the anonymous “Ghost of Barry Fairbrother” begins to post incriminating messages on the Council’s website. Racial prejudices surface, as do prejudices based on class.

The style which was so effective for Rowling when she was writing Harry Potter is less effective in this “adult” novel. Here she creates characters who are memorable for some aspects of their characters without being unique, while on the level of plot, the conflicts and crises, based on real life, are already familiar to devoted readers of contemporary fiction and, I regret to say, feel trite. At five hundred pages, this novel gave Rowling many opportunities to introduce broad themes and to develop them with sophistication and attention to universal values. Instead, she gives us a long novel which is sometimes exciting on the limited level of plot, but which remains on that limited level, never soaring into broader realms of wider scope. What starts in Pagford stays in Pagford, unfortunately.

For those old enough to remember the excitement which accompanied Peyton Place when Grace Metalious published it in 1956, this novel bears some similarities. Peyton Place, however, was new and exciting over fifty years ago, and its focus on the hidden, the secret, the mysterious, and the sexy felt refreshingly original and astonishingly real. This novel, while sometimes exciting in individual scenes, felt artificial to me, as if the author had a list of characteristics that she thought would work for an adult novel. The characters here sometimes feel like paper dolls, limited by their rather stereotyped depictions, while their sheer numbers prevent the author from developing subtleties that make them come alive. A few characters are exceptions, but part of the reason these are exceptional is that their stories are so sad and so pathetic that the reader is hoping for their success, despite their limitations as characters. The conclusion, which feels powerful and moving to some readers, felt contrived to me. I do not think of myself as a cynic, but I had expected the plot to contain these twists, based on the direction the novel was taking over its five-hundred-page duration, with no miracles, no twists leading to happy surprises. Ultimately, I agreed with the harsh conclusion of Tessa, the guidance counselor, who tells one of her students here: “You think reality is up for negotiation, that we think it’s whatever you say it is. You must accept that we are as real as you are; you must accept that you are not God.”

Photos, in order: The author’s photo (Reuters) appears on http://www.csmonitor.com

Yate, the Gloucestershire town where Rowling was born, features this central shopping center: http://www.yourlocalweb.co.uk

Tutshill, the Gloucestershire town where Rowling lived from age nine, is shown on http://www.panoramio.com

One of the unusual characteristics of Pagford is its ruin of an Abbey on the top of a hill.  Hailes Abbey, shown here, is also in Gloucestershire and may have served as the inspiration for this detail.  http://www.panoramio.com

According to the British press, Rowling has rejected the rural culture in which she grew up and which is seen in this novel.  A story about this may be accessed here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/

St. Peter:  ‘Tell us what [resurrection] was like.’

Lazarus:  ‘Let me speak with Jesus…Please, we have some catching up to do.”

St. Peter:  ‘Do you want to thank him?”

Lazarus:  ‘I don’t know.  What counts as good behaviour after a resurrection?’ ”

In this startling and ingenious “biography” of Lazarus, told with a light, often humorous touch, Richard Beard defies the limits of biography by mixing known elements from the Gospel of John (and from historical research) with elements from his own imagination. Often “proving” his theories about the relationship of Lazarus and Jesus by drawing on the equally fertile imaginations of many other novelists and artists who have also explored the story of Lazarus, Beard then adds additional elements of fantasy, where necessary, to flesh out the story and make his points. The result is a unique look at the life of Lazarus – and of Jesus – which will surprise and delight readers who have a flexible view of scripture and a sense of perspective, if not humor. I hasten to add here that Beard is not writing a satire or a farce, and he is especially careful in his presentation to avoid any sense of disrespect toward the religious context of his story – he is simply offering some alternatives to a contemporary reader while giving new meaning to the term “fictionalized biography” as he depicts Lazarus.

The Lazarus and Jesus we see in this biographical novel are products of their times, friends from childhood who were so close that people found them difficult to tell apart. Born at the same time in Bethlehem, Lazarus believes that the appearance of a bright star at his birth augurs his own future success, and, in fact, he has now become a successful trader of sheep in Bethany, having captured the market for sacrificial lambs at the local synagogue. Jesus and his family have moved frequently, and though each knows what the other has been doing, the two boys, now thirty-two-year-old men, have not seen each other for thirteen years.

Through Lazarus’s eyes, the story of their shared childhood unfolds in flashbacks, including the escape their families made together after Joseph, father of Jesus, was told by an angel that soldiers were about to massacre all the male children in the city. Joseph and his family brought along Lazarus and his family when they escaped to Egypt – and only they escaped. “That’s what friends are for,” Joseph explains. The boys also suffer a childhood tragedy together, and it is clear that Jesus, even then, had an idea of his later mission in life. Now an adult drawing large crowds throughout the country, Jesus has become a tangible threat to the Romans and to several different branches of Judaism who are losing their congregations to Jesus, but when Lazarus’s future father-in-law questions him about Jesus and their friendship, Lazarus downplays his importance – “He was a small boy with scabs on his knees. Like the rest of us. He couldn’t even swim.”

The new action of the novel begins a year before the crucifixion of Jesus, and the reader quickly becomes involved as Jesus begins to perform miracles – turning water into wine at the Wedding of Cana, healing a sick boy while he is twenty miles away, healing a paralyzed man so he can walk, and feeding five thousand people with a few fish and loaves of bread. With the first miracle, however, Lazarus becomes mysteriously ill, and as successive miracles occur, his illnesses become more serious, more devastating, and more painful.  Jesus continues to make miracles. He walks on water, heals a blind man, and begins to practice resurrections.

The events leading to the obvious historical climax take place in the space of a little over a week, beginning with the death of Lazarus, then moving to his resurrection by Jesus four days later, the crucifixion of Jesus four days after that, and the resurrection of Jesus on the third day after the crucifixion. The novel is organized in unusual fashion around the seven miracles and their aftermaths, the chapters numbered backward from seven until the climax, then forward after that, focusing on the aftereffects of these miracles. Those who have been the recipients of miracles, and especially those who have been resurrected, have another chance at life, of course, though what they do with their new lives becomes a question for them. The political and religious conflicts of the era come to a head with the deaths of Lazarus and Jesus. The authorities representing both Rome and the factions of Judaism must come to grips with the results, their power challenged by these dramatic events in ways never even imagined before this. What happens to both Jesus and Lazarus physically in the aftermath of resurrection raises interesting questions for historians and theologians and stimulates Beard’s fertile imagination here.

A whole panoply of other authors helps author Beard to make his case for the “realism” of his depiction of Lazarus and his relationship with Jesus. Jose Saramago in The Gospel According to Jesus Christ (1991), Karel Kapek in Lazarus (1949), Nikos Kazantzakis in The Last Temptation (1961), Robert Graves in King Jesus (1946), Par Lagerqvist in Barabbas (1950), and Norman Mailer in The Gospel According to the Son (1997) are among the many authors who “testify” to the truth of Beard’s assumptions about Lazarus and Jesus. Art works by Juan de Flandes, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Limbourg Brothers in their Tres Riches Heures of the Duc de Berry (1412 – 1414) provide additional “insights” into the death of Lazarus, while works by Fra Angelico (1520), Andrea del Castagno (1447) and Leonardo da Vinci depict Jesus’s Last Supper and the Crucifixion.

The characters feel “real,” at least in modern terms, as they deal with surreal events, but the novel is more philosophical and more wildly imaginative than most biographies, especially in its use of other novels and art work as “primary sources.” The novel fills in the gaps between the earlier gospels and the Gospel of John, the only gospel to mention Lazarus, while also encouraging the reader to think in new directions. Unusual in its selection of subject, development of character, and depiction of imagined motivations, this novel is sure to intrigue those willing and able to “go with the flow” of this unique, miracle-based fictional biography.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo is from http://www.uea.ac.uk

The Tomb of Lazarus in Bethany has two levels, as described in the novel: http://198.62.75.4/www1/ofm/sbf/escurs/Ger/14escursEn.html

The Raising of Lazarus by Juan de Flandes (1510 – 1518) is from http://commons.wikimedia.org

The Antonia Fortress, where Lazarus was held for a few days, is shown in a model.  The original fortress was destroyed in 70 A.D.   http://commons.wikimedia.org

The Church of St. Lazarus in Larnica, Cyprus, contains a “tomb of St. Lazarus” and may confirm the final extent of his wanderings in the eastern Mediterranean.http://www.allposters.com

ARC: Europa

Note: This book is WINNER of the Man Booker Prize for 2012 and WINNER of the Costa Award for 2012.

“The order goes to the Tower, ‘Bring up the bodies.’  Deliver, that is, the accused men…to Westminster Hall for trial…It is 12 May [1536], a Friday.  They are brought in by armed guards through a fulminating crowd shouting the odds [on whether] they live or die…The [crowd] does not understand the law…There is only one penalty for high treason: for a man, to be hanged, cut down alive and eviscerated, or for a woman, to be burned.”

In her previous novel, Wolf Hall, author Hilary Mantel, recreates the dramatic story of Sir Thomas More’s trial and execution in July, 1535, during the reign of  King Henry VIII.  As she opens this novel, a continuation of that story, set just three months later, More’s downfall is still fresh in the minds of everyone at Henry’s court.  Thomas Cromwell, who prosecuted More on behalf of the king, is now Henry’s chief minister, firmly ensconced in the power structure of the Tudor Court.  He will have plenty of work to do over the next seven or eight months.  Katherine of Aragon, Henry’s queen of twenty years, is now living in her own court with her daughter Mary, her marriage to Henry having been annulled in 1533, while Henry was living with Anne Boleyn.  Henry is now married to Anne, a calculating but beautiful woman who has never been shy about using her wiles to get what she wants, but he has now wearied of her. Though Anne has given birth to Elizabeth, she has been unable to bear him a son, and with the marriage less exciting than it once was, Henry has convinced himself that she never will bear him the heir he wants.  Assigning Cromwell to find a way to free him from his new queen, Henry begins to pursue the plain and modest Jane Seymour, whose virginal ways stand in sharp contrast to those of Anne.

The personal, political, and religious conflicts among the families and courtiers of Katherine, who is Catholic; the ambitious family and friends of Anne Boleyn, who, are, of necessity, a part of the Church of England; and eventually the family of Jane Seymour create myriad complications for Henry and his ministers, especially Thomas Cromwell.  Everyone at court must take care that the internecine rivalries remain in check, and Cromwell, especially, must constantly watch his back.

Young Henry VIII

As complex as Henry’s personal life may be, his political relationships with France, Spain, and the Holy Roman Empire are also perpetually changing.  War is always threatening, none of the countries trust each other, and secret negotiations regarding marriages of state, the exchange of envoys, and the creation of secret alliances are always under way.  The annulment of Henry’s marriage to Katherine, done over the objections of the papacy, and the “certification” of his new marriage to Anne Boleyn have led to a complete break with the papacy. Henry is now the head of his own Church of England, though his theology remains virtually unchanged, and he, Cromwell, and the priests in England are constantly wrangling about the practical issues of their church vs. the papacy.  Of particular importance is Henry’s decision to seize monasteries, starting with the smaller ones, with all the assets and lands going to Henry to pay for his court and his wars.

Katherine of Aragon

Author Hilary Mantel focuses the novel on Cromwell, who must deal with the members of all the various factions of the court and all the international intrigue.  An error could be fatal to him.  She vividly recreates the complex maneuvering on all levels as Henry becomes impatient to be freed of Anne.  As Cromwell comes up with a plan which will satisfy Henry, the characters and the period come vibrantly to life, despite the intricacies of genealogy and the political complexity.  The devious plot to entrap Anne and those who support her (since her family and her courtiers can never be trusted to simply change their allegiances to Henry once she is out of favor) unfolds with a kind of panache and care for realistic details that are rarely seen in fiction – a scheme so clever and full of malice that it sometimes feels like a secret memoir from the period.

Queen Anne Boleyn

From the initial interrogation of one of Anne’s terrified ladies-in-waiting, who is willing to say what Cromwell wants to hear in exchange for the cancellation of her embarrassing debts, to the insinuation of Anne’s crimes by numerous other (jealous) ladies-in-waiting who simply dislike her, Cromwell develops a case against Anne.  As the characters talk at cross purposes, the clever dialogue becomes filled with dramatic irony.  When questioned, several lords who have been lured into the web, have no choice but to say what they are expected to say – either with or without torture, guilty or innocent.  As Thomas Wriothesley, “Call-Me-Risley,” an officer of state, remarks to Cromwell while they are discussing the list of those who will go on trial, “I see [now].  It is not so much, who is guilty, as whose guilt is of service to you. I admire you, sir.  You are deft in these matters, and without false compunction.”

Jane Seymour

The lively dialogue in these strong dramatic scenes conveys information as well as the characters’ feelings.  At the same time, it also inspires feelings within the reader – anger, sympathy, resentment, or even pity for these characters, all of whom are pawns.  Cromwell’s questioning of people reveals their fright, their resentment of Cromwell, their jealousy of Anne, or their attraction to Anne.  The degree to which the women, especially, are the lowliest pawns of all in the great game of court politics is obvious, and the extent to which other courtiers are limited in their choice of actions becomes especially clear as the grand plot against Anne Boleyn is revealed.

The Tower of London

As the action moves inexorably to the novel’s climax with arrests, trials, and gruesome executions, the reader understands just how all this came about, marveling at Mantel’s ability to make the reader feel not only like a witness to history but like a participant in it. When Anne ultimately faces trial, the reader that all this horror has happened in the mere seven months (and four hundred pages) since the novel opened. Though I am not generally a fan of historical fiction from this period, I have become a huge fan of Hilary Mantel, her writing so effective on so grand a scale that it is difficult to imagine how any other novel could surpass this one for the major literary prizes of the year.

Note: In her Author’s Note at the end of the book, Mantel describes Cromwell as “sleek, plump, and densely inaccessible, like a choice plum in a Christmas pie; but I hope to continue my efforts to dig him out,” good news for Mantel’s fans who are hoping for a continuation of Cromwell’s story.

ALSO by Hilary Mantel, WOLF HALL        and       THE ASSASSINATION OF MARGARET THATCHER

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on
http://www.bbc.co.uk

Henry VIII, Portrait by Joos van Cleve, from  http://tudorhistory.org

Katherine of Aragon, photo from Getty Images: http://www.guardian.co.uk

Queen Anne Boleyn:  from   http://www.fanpop.com

Jane Seymour: from http://www.anne-boleyn.com

The Tower of London: from http://www.copyright-free-pictures.org.uk

Note: This novel was SHORTLISTED for the UK’s Orange Prize for 2012.

“When Tinu drew a room, he drew it empty. He drew it as it was but somehow what you saw was not the room but its emptiness. With a door you saw the opening. When he drew a pitchfork left leaning against the barn wall you saw its abandonment….If the rooms were real [however], the people were not. They were only symbols of people. They had no smiles.”

In this sensitive novel about an unusual and touching friendship, author Georgina Harding tells the story of life in a rural community in Romania beginning in the 1930s and extending through World War II and the Communist Occupation. As the novel opens, a sick and starving man has just arrived by train in Iasi, a place with which he is completely unfamiliar. He is looking for a woman, but he does not know where or how to find her. Knowing no one there, he spends the night on a park bench. In the morning he sees a nurse dressed in white walking past him, and, thinking she is an angel, he follows her to a hospital where he collapses at the entrance. The man is Augustin, known as Tinu, and he is looking for Safta, a childhood friend whom he has not seen since they were separated by the war and Communist Occupation.

Years ago, they both lived at Poiana, a large country estate some distance from Iasi, the nearest city. The novel’s narrative moves back and forth in time, changing perspectives as the author alternates the action between Tinu and Safta during their years together at Poiana, and the present, when they are adults in Iasu. Tinu, is the son of the estate’s cook, and Safta, the daughter of the estate’s owners, yet they form a unique and lasting bond. With exquisite care, the author recreates the world of childhood as Tinu and Safta experience and understand it, never resorting to easy sentimentality as she tells their stories.

Tinu is both deaf and mute, and he is either uninterested or unable to learn sign language. He can write a few words, but does not seem able connect them with what they represent in the outside world. His only form of communication is through haunting drawings which he makes with soot and spit on found materials – paper, boxes, wrappings, pieces of cloth – and these drawings reflect an unusually selective view of the world. “Did he not care about people?” his mother wonders in his childhood. “He [makes] horses better than humans…and cows and chickens.” Safta, with the innocence of childhood, sees how dramatically different his world is from her own, but she also understands intuitively the way he thinks and the conclusions he draws about life. From his infancy, he would “[watch] her dancing movements as if she was some flickering, endlessly absorbing film running before his eyes…the little girl a tiny dark silent actress,” not completely real. Though she tries to teach him to write, she is a child, too, easily distracted by the natural excitements of her own childhood, and she has other friends with whom to spend time, especially as she develops into adolescence and is courted by a summer visitor. “Tinu had a way that let you forget him,” she notes, years later. “Even when he stood right in front of you there was no insistence to his presence.”


As the past unfolds, the simple, sensitively depicted scenes from childhood send out ripples that include the individual members of Safta’s family, the servants and Tinu’s family, visitors, villagers, and their children, and broaden naturally to encompass bigger, more complex observations about life and the novel’s themes of identity and connection. The author unifies the novel from beginning to end with perfect details, carefully connecting even the earliest scenes from the lives of Tinu and Safta with their perceptions as they grow, effectively shifting the focus back and forth between them at Poiana. She then puts everything into perspective through the later events in which Tinu is now a patient at the hospital where Safta works as a nurse. She has recognized Tinu at the hospital, and she brings him paper and drawing materials, “talking” to him daily, in hopes of unlocking and understanding the world into which he has retreated. Many scenes stir the reader’s emotions without being sentimental or maudlin, and the author’s respect for these characters (and her audience) is obvious.

Basic questions about how we know and understand each other, how we perceive the world, and how we communicate with it echo throughout the novel, and the outbreak of war and the eventual Occupation put these themes into stark perspective. As the adult Safta observes, “We’re all so many people, aren’t we, nowadays?…There are the people we are inside, then the people we used to be, then there are the people other people think we are.”

An intriguing story underlies the writing of this novel. According to Bloomsbury, Georgina Harding’s publisher, she had visited Romania years ago and had always wanted to contrast the horror of its modern history with the beauty of its landscape. To write as an “outsider,” however, is usually disastrous for a novelist who wants make characters and setting come alive. When Harding discovered by chance the artwork of American artist James Castle, a deaf mute from Garden Valley, Idaho, she realized that “his sooty drawings” on found materials resembled the scenes she remembered from Romania. By using Castle as the model for the main character here, the author was able to set the book in Romania, which she has visited but of which she is not a resident, and depict it through his eyes. Since he is self-isolated, this cancels the need of the author to tell about Romania from the “inside” and allows her to create a fascinating character-based novel of people in crisis.

1939 Lagonda

Though the novel is often breath-taking and profoundly moving, the elegant language sometimes gets in the way of natural-sounding dialogue. The character of Andrei, to whom Safta is drawn during her adolescent years, is thin, and the ending, though consistent in some ways with Tinu’s attitudes and limited ability to express feelings, is implausible. These seem like minor complaints about a superb book that I loved reading, however. Through this book, I have discovered a new (to me) author of startling, original talent, and second, through her, I have found the work of James Castle, the unusual “outsider artist” on whom she has based the character of Tinu. On my list of Favorites for 2012.

ALSO by Harding:  THE GUN ROOM

Photos, in order: The author’s photo by Murdo Macleod appears on http://www.guardian.co.uk

James Castle’s depiction of farm buildings may be found on http://www.brooklynrail.org/auction/james-castle The author based her depiction of Tinu on this American artist from Idaho (1899 – 1997).  This drawing is on a piece of  lined notebook paper.

James Castle’s free-standing people lack faces, as do Tinu’s.  This photo appears on http://gapersblock.com/ac/2009/10/

Safta and her mother take Tinu to visit a monastery, and he is inspired by the colorful frescos and mosaics.    The Putna Monastery may be seen on http://www.bestourism.com

Andrei, to whom Safta is drawn as a teenager, is remembered by Tinu primarily for his car, a Lagonda convertible, seen here:
http://www.conceptcarz.com

ARC: from Bloomsbury USA

“Why was the Bay of Djibouti so attractive to the Europeans?  And what was Djibouti originally?  A handful of little magical islands over which history rose and swirled like a hurricane for centuries?  A handful of little islands like beauty spots on the neck of a beautiful woman rich in legends and rumours?”

In one of the most stimulating novels I have read in months, Djibouti author Abdourahman A. Waberi, now living in France, explores issues of crucial contemporary importance while examining the history of religious extremism and how young people are drawn to it.  He does this within the context of an intriguing, often poetic, novel which contains mysteries, a spy narrative, secret identities, a writer speaking from the grave,  and a mystical, real-time connection between two characters who never meet during the narrative.   I was glued to the pages of this short novel, and I am still thinking of all the mysteries the author raises here as he takes the reader in new directions, offering no easy answers.

In the opening chapter, Djibril, a Djibouti native now living in Montreal and working for a North American security company, returns on assignment to his former country after being away for eleven years:  “I am on assignment in the land of my birth, the land that would not or could not keep me…The past interests me less than the future and my time is precious….In the world I [now] come from, time doesn’t stretch out before you into the mist.  Time is money.”  Djibril (“Call me Djib.”) has arrived on a one-week mission to evaluate whether Djibouti is secure, the political situation stable, and the terrorists under control. His employer, Adorno Location Scouting, has been contracted to investigate on behalf of a client which wants to do some development there, but they need someone like Djibril with insights into the country itself for the security analysis.  Despite being away from Djibouti for more than a decade, however, Djibril is not anonymous – he is tracked by unidentified men from the instant he sets foot on the soil.

Chapters about Djibril alternate with narratives by a mysterious prisoner, confined to a tiny cell on a desert island with only a blind old man for company.  This prisoner has become a scribe for the old man, his Venerable Master, recording his thoughts on scraps of paper which blow under the door of their cell.  The prisoner seems to have supernatural knowledge about Djibril, his arrival, and of the fact that he is being followed, and he is decidedly hostile towards him.

Goubet al-Kharat (the Devil’s Cauldron), with the Devil’s Isles in the background.  Photo from: http://epousesemia.canalblog.com

As Djibril details the country’s social conditions in his notebook, he comments on the intrusion of foreigners into the country and their damaging effects, not just on Djibouti but throughout the Third World:  “Today sovereign states are losing ground, becoming denationalized in the big picture of globalization.  They see whole chunks of their sovereignty crumble away, given over to conglomerates.” In Djibouti, Dubai has built a huge industrial park, and the Saudis want to build an eighteen-mile long bridge over the strait at the entrance to the Red Sea, between Djibouti and Yemen.  A new city, The City of Light, built by foreigners, will arise near this bridge, with a twin city built on the other side of the bridge in Yemen.  The US has long had a command center near the entrance to the Red Sea, and Italy and France have been fighting for influence in Djibouti for generations.  The country, the author says, is the “greatest powder keg in the world after Afghanistan and Iraq.”

Ardoukoba, the volcanic zone at the end of the Gulf of Tadjoura. Photo by George Kourounis.

According to the prisoner, the development of terror cells, promoted and taught by a charismatic zealot, has appealed to many of the youth, who feel they no longer have a place in their country, which is now being governed by leaders with connections to foreigners.  “Inspired by Satan, [their leaders] opted for the worst of all tactics.  With a great deal of money, they were able to hire impious soldiers and sign pacts with foreign powers that are nothing more than the military branch of the Vatican or Israel.”  As a result of the zealot’s efforts, “Fresh recruits came pouring in…including battalions of mature men who had seen the light.”  The revolution he envisions will start from the Horn, branch out into Africa, and ultimately arise in the Urals, and spread to the “petromonarchies” of the Gulf.

As Djibril investigates, without much in the way of results, he remembers his past, his loving relationship with his grandfather, his difficulties with his mother, and his problems with his twin brother.  He enjoys the memories of his best friend and soul brother, David, a Jewish boy.  The prisoner, however, has harsher memories, and is clearly influenced by the intensity of the blind prophet and his own devotion to him and to Allah.  As he is recording his Venerable Master’s words, however, he is suddenly overcome by a mystical experience:  the paper on which he has been recording the Master begins to look as if it has other words, not his own, written there in tiny script, a “palimpsest.”  When he breathes on the paper, the script becomes clear, and it is foreign, associated with someone named Walter Benjamin, a German-Jewish philosopher, critic, and writer.  Benjamin was forced to flee Germany and then France during the Nazi takeover, ultimately escaping toward Spain in the hope of reaching Portugal, just as Djibril has fled to France from Djibouti.  Long passages from this “Book of Ben,” continue to raise ideas in conflict with much that the prisoner has learned.

The drama ratchets up when Djibril makes contact with someone who can provide him with information he needs, leading to a climactic final scene.  Throughout, Djibril’s seemingly casual, comfortable attitudes draw in the reader, in contrast to those of the prisoner, who is distant and driven.  Still, there were times in which I wondered (wrongly) whether the prisoner even existed and whether he might be an alterego for Djibril, since they seemed to share something on a psychic level.  Parts of the “Book of Ben” are at times obscure, and a coherent picture of Walter Benjamin’s ideas does not fully emerge, but this does not limit their interest or their effects on the reader, including the prisoner.  The author deliberately leaves questions unanswered while creating many ironies in his conclusion, and I suspect that I will be thinking of this unsettling, evocative, and memorable novel for weeks to come.

Also by Waberi:  TRANSIT

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on
http://word.world-citizenship.org

The Devil’s Cauldron is located at the end of the Gulf of Tadjoura, an inlet from the Gulf of Aden.  Djibril visits this area on his second day in Djibouti.  Photo from http://epousesemia.canalblog.com

Ardoukouba is in the mountains not far from the Gulf of Tadjoura, a volcanic area where “the Gulf comes to die.”  This photo by George Kourounis is from  http://www.stormchaser.ca

The Selected Writings of Walter Benjamin are published by Harvard University Press.

The map of Djibouti and surrounding countries shows Djibouti and Yemen straddling the entrance to the Red Sea. http://www.gettingaround.net

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »