Feed on
Posts
Comments

John Boyne–THE ABSOLUTIST

“There were twenty of us in my barracks…twenty boys. And only two came back. One who went mad, and myself. But that doesn’t mean we survived [the war]. I don’t think I did survive it. I may not be buried in a French field but I linger there. My spirit does, anyway…There’s a difference between breathing and being alive.”—Tristan Sadler

Although a major part of The Absolutist centers on the horrors of World War I, Irish author John Boyne has created a novel which goes beyond the typical “war story” and becomes also a study of character and values. This broader scope allows the novel to appeal to a wider audience interested in seeing the effects of war on the main character, Tristan Sadler, throughout the rest of his life. More a popular novel than a “literary” novel in its appeal to the reader, Boyne has carefully constructed the plot with alternating time settings – before, during, and after the war – to take full advantage of the elements of surprise. The author often hints at personal catastrophes or dramatic events in one part of the novel, creating a sense of suspense and foreboding, then reveals these secret events in grand fashion in another part, keeping the pace so lively that it is difficult for the reader to find a place to stop.

The novel begins with Tristan Sadler, now twenty, arriving in Norwich, England, on an undescribed personal mission. The war has been over for nine months, but Tristan still has many issues to resolve, among them nervousness and stress-related trembling, particularly of his right hand and index finger. Though he “hasn’t been well” for the past three years, he leaves London for this meeting in Norwich, only to find upon his late arrival that his room in a lodging house is not ready. To pass the time until the room is cleaned, Tristan walks around the town, reminiscing about his past, and in so doing, sets up some of the themes and symbols that pervade the novel.

Norwich Castle

He circles Norwich Castle, but does not go inside: “Castles such as this, after all, were nothing more than the remains of military bases where soldiers might camp out and wait for the enemy to appear. I did not need to see any more of that.” Though he is an agnostic, he goes inside Norwich Cathedral, “not so much for [the] religious aspect – but for the peace and tranquility it offered within.” Most importantly, on leaving the cathedral, he sees the bust and the grave of Edith Cavell, “our great nurse patriot, who had helped hundreds of British prisoners of war escape from Belgium,” only to be captured in 1915, tried by the Germans, executed by firing squad, and ultimately declared a heroine and a martyr. Tristan feels “a great sense of joy at discovering her grave.”

A butcher shop, similar to the one belonging to Tristan’s father, complete with sawdust on the floor, is a symbol paralleliing the carnage of war.

Flashing back three years, the author then presents Tristan as a seventeen-year-old who has been thrown out of home and family. Having refused to join his father in the family butchery, he lies about his age and volunteers for war. With no one who cares whether he is alive or dead, he trains as a soldier at Aldershot under Sgt. James Clayton, a sadistic leader, totally committed to the war and to the killing. After ten weeks’ training, his group of twenty men is transported to France. Among his few friends in the trenches is Will Bancroft, the son of Rev. Bancroft, vicar of the cathedral in Norwich.

Norwich Cathedral

When Will dies in France, something we know from the opening pages, Tristan writes to Will’s sister Marion, arranging to go to Norfolk to return all the letters she wrote to Will while he was overseas. Once he has arrived, however, Tristan is unsure whether he has done the right thing. Marion is tense and quarrelsome, and wants him to talk with her parents. Tristan, nervous to start with, is terrified. “Why did I come here?,” he asks himself. “What was I thinking? If it was redemption I sought, there was none to be found. If it was understanding, there was no one who could offer it. If it was forgiveness, I deserved none.” More mysteries are suggested at the meeting with the parents.

Bust of Edith Cavell

As the action of the novel moves back and forth between Tristan’s actions in Norfolk in June, 1919, and in France between July and September, 1916, the author creates suspense by having the characters in 1919 refer to events from 1916 which the author has not yet introduced, leaving the reader to wonder what new mysteries underlie Tristan’s visit. Some of these mysteries also revolve upon Tristan’s memories of his own childhood, some of which connect with what happens in France. Two characters in his group in France prove to be conscientious objectors, one of them still waiting for his approval from the army. These characters, who discuss their beliefs with Tristan, are sometimes assigned to be as stretcher-bearers, one of the most dangerous jobs of all, since they are exposed to German bullets the minute they leave the trenches. Many of them die, but they have dared to challenge the “moral absolute” of war and do not fire their guns, preferring the moral absolute of peace. Tristan challenges nothing, hoping only to survive so he can return to real life.

Grave, Edith Cavell, Norwich Cathedral

Though author Boyne provides plot twists galore, the pattern of the plot structure itself becomes a bit predictable after awhile, with constant unexplained references leading to mysteries which are then reconciled to reveal important information. At times, the reader may feel manipulated, his/her feelings held captive by the author until the time arrives to reveal another surprise. Any big questions about character arise from information withheld, rather than, more subtly, from contradictory information which the reader acquires from observing a character’s long-term behavior and then reconciles for him/herself based on the characters’ continuing actions. In fact, the first “surprise” of the novel is one that most readers will guess almost immediately. Tristan’s appearance in the conclusion as an eighty-year-old man, brings his life (and the author’s themes) up to date, as he reviews his decisions and behavior, but it also feels contrived.

The novel propels itself with exciting scenes while also presenting thoughtful contrasts between “absolutists” totally dedicated to a point of view which will allow for no compromise, and those who see compromise as essential to survival. The many thematic symbols (Tristan refusing to work in the family butcher shop but enlisting in the army, Edith Cavell vs. Tristan in ideology, and a conscientious objector vs. Sgt. Clayton) provide reminders of the dangers and difficulties that can arise whenever these issues become questions of morality or theology. Though the novel is very serious, with no humor to leaven it, The Absolutist is riveting, and a fast read.

ALSO by John Boyne: THIS HOUSE IS HAUNTED,     A LADDER TO THE SKY

Photos, in order: The author’s photo by Murdo Macleod is from http://www.guardian.co.uk

Norwich Castle appears here:  http://www.yourvillage.flyer.co.uk

A butcher shop, similar to the one belonging to Tristan’s father, complete with sawdust on the floor, is from http://kindredfootprints.blogspot.com, a symbol which parallels the carnage of war.

Norwich Cathedral is from http://www.art-history-images.com

The bust of Edith Cavell, an absolutist who saved hundreds of soldiers in Belgium and was martyred for her work and beliefs, is on a monument at Norwich Cathedral:   http://www.oldcity.org.uk More information about Edith Cavell appears on this site.

The grave of Edith Cavell at Norwich Cathedral:  http://gallery.nen.gov.uk

ARC:  Other Press

“For [my parents]  it was not enough for me to be intelligent, rational, good, sensitive, creative, and thoughtful with the dreamy vision of an artist. In addition, I also had to be a seer and a fortune-teller, a kind of family oracle. After all, everyone knew that children were closer to nature, to the magical bosom of creation, not having been corrupted yet by lies or poisoned by selfish considerations.”

The child of Ashkenazi Jews who escaped to Jerusalem just before the outbreak of World War II, Amos Klausner (the author’s original name) grew up in a scholarly family which encouraged his precocity. His great uncle Joseph was Chair of Jewish History at Hebrew University of Jerusalem and wrote his magnum opus about Jesus of Nazareth. His father read sixteen or seventeen languages, wrote poetry, and had an enormous library, while his mother spoke four or five languages, could read seven or eight, and told elaborate stories.

Amos grew up a solitary child, encouraged to entertain himself while his parents worked. Always a writer at heart, he believed that “it was not enough for me to be intelligent, rational, good, sensitive, creative…. I was a one-child show…a non-stop performance,” always on display to the relatives, his accomplishments never seeming to be enough.  He had an additional problem, which reached to the heart of who he was: “I was a word-child,” he says, “but I had no one to listen to me.”

In this elaborate, non-linear autobiography, Oz and his family are seen as archetypal immigrants to Jerusalem, people who arrived when the land was still under British rule and who helped create a new homeland, arguing ferociously about the direction the country should take and the leaders who should lead it. The history of Jerusalem combines with the author’s own genealogical records and his memories about his early family life to create a broad picture of the society in which he grew up and in which his writing talent took root.

Detailed, highly descriptive, and filled with introspection about his unusual life, the book shows the tensions within the society and within his family. After his mother’s suicide when he was twelve, he broke with his father, joined a kibbutz, and changed his name at fifteen. His observations about himself in relation to his peers and in relation to the outside world, even at that young age, show his inner turmoil and determination to discover a personal identity.

As the book moves back and forth in time, the author comments about his writing, the people who influenced him, and his “pickpocketing,” his “stealing” of the lives of real people in order to invent stories about them. His observations about Israel, its leaders, its never-ending wars with the Arabs, and his experience as a resident of a kibbutz for more than thirty years broaden the scope and provide insight into one man’s life in this developing country. Obviously a huge achievement for Oz personally, this is also a huge contribution to the understanding of the growth of a Jewish homeland and to an understanding of how Oz became the writer he is. Much more detailed and leisurely than Oz’s novels, this is slow but satisfying reading for those who admire his novels.

Photos, in order:

The author’s photo by Colin McPherson/Corbis appears on www.debezigebij.nl

The author with his parents, Fania and Yehuda Arye Klausner, is from a family website, which also has a photo of the author’s great-uncle Joseph, who plays a significant part in the author’s story: http://www.eilatgordinlevitan.com

The Hulda kibbutz, in which Oz lived as a child and for many years as an adult, is now the site of the Barkan winery, the country’s largest,  moved there in 2004 when the company left its earlier site in Barkan on the West Bank.  http://www.inminds.com

ALSO by Amos Oz:  MY MICHAEL,     PANTHER IN THE BASEMENT,       SOUMCHI,      THE RHYMING LIFE AND DEATH,     SCENES FROM VILLAGE LIFE    JUDAS

“In an age of wicked women, [Idina Sackville] had pushed the boundaries of behavior to extremes.…She danced, stayed out all night, and slept around more noticeably than her fellows. When the sexual scandals of Happy Valley gripped the world’s press, Idina was at the heart of them. When women were…divorcing to marry again, Idina did so – not just once, but several times. As one of her many in-laws told me, ‘It was an age of bolters, but Idina was by far the most celebrated.’ ”

Using documents and photographs that have never before been available, along with private diaries and interviews with some of those who knew Idina Sackville, author Frances Osborne creates a lively, readable, and well researched biography which attempts to understand what aspects of Idina Sackville’s early family life might have helped create a person so flamboyant, sexually adventurous, and hedonistic that she became world famous, just for being who she was. The author has special reason to ponder this subject. When she was thirteen, The Sunday Times (London) began a serialization of James Fox’s White Mischief, a detailed account of Happy Valley and the British aristocrats who had participated in the “mischief” in Kenya. The author and her twelve-year-old sister Kate devoured each installment as it came out. “Was this the secret to being irresistible to men,” she wondered, “to behave as this woman did, while ‘walking barefoot at every available opportunity’ as well as being ‘intelligent, well-read, enlivening company’?” One afternoon, with a twinkle in his eye, her father told his embarrassed wife Davina that it was time for her to come clean. Davina had to admit to her daughters that she was the granddaughter of Idina Sackville, and they themselves were Idina’s great-granddaughters.

Immediately, Frances Osborne could “feel my great-grandmother’s long, manicured fingernails resting on my forearm as I wondered which of her impulses might surface in me.” For over thirty years, Idina Sackville had done exactly what she wanted, when she wanted, and with whom she wanted, becoming famous on three continents for her outrageous sexual exploits, her nudity at parties, the bed-hopping games she invented for house parties, her drinking, and even her occasional experimentation with drugs. Her friends, especially in Kenya’s Happy Valley, equally amoral, participated in several shootings or attempted shootings, the highly publicized murder of one of Idina’s ex-husbands, the subsequent trial for that murder involving another member of Happy Valley, several suicides, and cases of drug addiction, one of them leading to death.

1923 Hispano Suiza, the car Idina brought to Kenya

Beginning with Idina’s earliest background, the author explores the family history. Idina’s father, Gilbert Sackville, the 8th Earl of De La Warr, possessed an eight hundred-year-old title but very little income. Her mother, Muriel Brassey, on the other hand, was the non-aristocratic granddaughter of a man who had been so successful in “trade” that on his death he left “the largest amount for which probate has ever been granted under any one will.”  Their marriage in 1891, pointedly not attended by his parents, made her a countess and gave him an income beyond what he could ever have imagined. They quickly had two daughters, Idina and Avie, and then a son who became the 9th Earl. Then, in 1902, as if to prove that her husband’s parents were right in disapproving of their aristocratic son’s marriage, Muriel shocked society by suing for divorce, almost unheard of, thereby preventing Gilbert from spending any more of her money on mistresses, most recently a cancan dancer, and giving her an opportunity to become independent. She soon built a house for her children, only a few miles away from the house they’d shared, and at least as elegant. Hers, unlike her ex-husband’s, was paid for.

The young Tallulah Bankhead, an Idina protegee

The mores of the times, in which many marriages were marriages of convenience, allowed both husbands and wives to take lovers, often from among their married friends. Married lovers, unlike lovers who were single, did not expect a change in their lover’s status quo, thereby preserving the lover’s family assets – and if a pregnancy resulted, the child could be incorporated into the woman’s already existing family. King Edward VII had set the pattern, with many lovers from among his friends’ wives, and adultery became “one of the ways in which those who did not have to work for a living could fill their afternoons.” As actress Mrs. Patrick Campbell said, “It doesn’t matter what you do in the bedroom as long as you don’t do it in the street and frighten the horses.” Muriel Brassey’s decision to divorce, an obvious breach of established social behavior, and her involvement in socialist causes and the suffrage movement further alienated her from aristocratic society and tainted the futures of her children. Eventually, however, Idina met a young Cavalry officer, David Euan Wallace, as much of a party animal as she was, whom she married and with whom she planned a sumptuous country house “with five wings and sixty-five rooms on the ground and first floors alone.”

Greta Garbo, playing the role of Idina,  with John Gilbert, in A Woman of Affairs

Before long, however, Euan was flagrantly unfaithful, and when World War I intervened and he was in France for much of the time, their bond frayed, despite their two small sons. Eventually, she divorced him to escape to Kenya with someone else, forced to leave the boys, aged four and three, behind, though she indicated to her dying day that she had always loved Euan. Eventually, she would have four more marriages and divorces and would become the “undisputed Queen of Happy Valley” in Kenya, her bed referred to as “the battleground.” Michael Arlen wrote a novel entitled The Green Hat about her, and its film version, A Woman of Affairs starred Greta Garbo. Nancy Mitford wrote three novels in which “the bolter,” the main character was purportedly modeled on Idina. Idina’s five marriages each lasted between four and eight years, but after each one, she “bolted” for someone or someplace new.

The remains of “Clouds,” the house Idina built during her fourth marriage.

A fascinating sociological study of the mores of aristocratic England and a personal study of Idina Sackville, who was both its victim and its most celebrated example, The Bolter will fascinate those interested in this period and in the unstated rules of aristocratic “society.” Most readers will become so involved in the story that they will probably ignore the sometimes awkward descriptions, the simple conclusions, and the possibly incorrect motivations attributed to the characters. The fact that many of these attitudes toward marriage, divorce, and the taking of lovers continues among the British high aristocracy after all these years continues to prove that old habits die slowly indeed.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.standard.co.uk

Idina purchased a 1923 Hispano Suiza car with a stork hood ornament, like this one, and took it with her to the mountains of Kenya. http://www.todaysvintage.com

After her first divorce, Idina moved in with a friend, Olga Lynn (Oggie), a singer and swinger in London.  When Tallulah Bankhead, a 21-year-old American (shown here with feathered headdress), came to London to appear in the show Dancers, they took her in and showed her how to diet off her puppy fat, then taught her about food and wine and “how to be decadent with style.”  http://home.hiwaay.net

Greta Garbo, with John Gilbert, playing the role of  Idina in A Woman of Affairs, based on the book, The Green Hat, by Michael Arlen. http://www.doctormacro.com

The remains of the house “Clouds,” which Idina built during her fourth marriage (to Donald Haldeman), now belongs to a multi-generational Kikuyu family with different family groups living separately in the various wings. http://www.cuboimages.it

The former living room and dining room at Clouds are now used only for storing maize: http://afarmhouseinkenya.com

THE BOLTER
REVIEW. Biography, Idina Sackville. England, Historical, Kenya, Psychological study, Social and Political Issues
Written by: Frances Osborne
Published by: Vintage
ISBN: 978-0307476425
Available in: Ebook Paperback

Note: Elizabeth Jolley was WINNER of both the Age Book of the Year Award and the Western Australian Premier’s Book Award in 1983 for this novel.

“His thoughts were of leaving [the nursing home] and of the place he wanted to go back to. It was his favorite thought and it consoled him. Slowly he allowed himself to think of the small house tucked away on a slope, partly in the shade of a row of pine trees planted by himself…He paused, in his thoughts, at the delicious moment of opening the door. He stretched out his hand…thinking about his rooms on the other side of the door.”—Mr. Scobie, at the nursing home.

Martin Scobie, David Hughes, and Fred Privett, all age eighty-five, have just been admitted to the nursing home of St. Christopher and St. Jude following the bizarre crash of their three ambulances at the intersection in front of the facility. Admitted for their recuperation, they must share a small single room in which the light switch can only be reached by leaning across one of the beds. Some furniture has been removed to accommodate the extra beds, and the wardrobe, blocking a window, is inaccessible because of the third bed. Even if they had a view through that window, however, their accommodations would not be much improved. “Immediately outside the window was a mass of dusty green foliage of the kind which grows outside kitchens and hotel toilets…The leaves, moving in endless trembling toward and away from one another, gave an impression of trying to speak or to listen but always turning away before any tiny message could either be given or heard,” a detail emblematic of all life at this nursing home, which “specializes” in non-communication, not just between staff and patients, but between staff and each other, and among the patients themselves.

As Australian author Elizabeth Jolley develops this relentlessly dark-humored and totally absorbing novel, she also displays enormous talent for developing sensitive character sketches of the elderly patients. All seem to be “nice,” even “sweet,” people, perhaps like our parents or grandparents, and though they may be a bit confused with all the changes in their lives which the nursing home has generated, a reader would need a heart of granite not to share their desires that they return home where they “belong.”  Mr. Hughes, for example, partly paralyzed, “kept wanting to say he was sorry because of all the things which had to be done for him.” Mr. Privett is a bit ditsy and repeats conversations he has had with his pet duck, Hep, whom he believes is “drunk” because she is brooding on a nest with fifteen eggs. He audibly reminds his pet chicken Hildegarde, that she is a “meat bird,” and all he wants is to get back to the poultry shed so he can enjoy a daily smoke with his birds. Mr. Scobie loves his old house and the sounds of the breeze, and as he muses about it, he now wishes he had also explored the hill behind it. A Bible scholar and lover of classical music, Mr. Scobie’s only potential pleasure at the nursing home is through the recordings he has brought with him.

Unfortunately, it appears that the deck is stacked against all of these people and the other residents of the home. Some critics have even suggested that this novel is reminiscent of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Though several of the old-timers do get up in the middle of the night to play raucous, cut-throat card games in Room 3, just down the hall from Mr. Scobie and the others in Room 1, the games are not fraught with the kind of horror one sees in Cuckoo’s Nest. Lt. Col. Price, the brother of Matron Hyacinth Price, always loses “big” at those card games, but there seem to be few penalties for losing. The home and the staff, however insensitive they may be, are far from being psychopaths like Nurse Ratched. Though the Matron herself does demand total allegiance, and is unsympathetic and clearly determined to get each of the patients to put all his/her money into the home’s accounts (to make life “easier” for them), she is neither as intelligent nor as evil as Nurse Ratched.

The patients are obviously never going to get back home, something the reader knows from the beginning, yet one cannot help but hope, as various characters take off on their own to try to find their way home, that one or two of them will succeed. Even if Matron Price does not get their property, however, they still lose – their heirs are already in charge. It is only a question of waiting for the narrative to develop to find out what the younger generation plans to do with the beloved “homes” of their hospitalized relatives.

As time passes, and the local choir ladies and little children come to the home to sing Christmas carols, the patients reveal what an ordeal this kind of visit is for them. As they “[feel] with old hands along the unfamiliar wall” to the gathering place for the concert, they each think of home and their own deceased relatives, the lovely family celebrations, and good times, but as their memories come flooding back and become all-important to them, the patients, unfortunately, have no one to share these with. Each lives in his own world, and the nursing home itself increases the sense of impersonality and dehumanization by not allowing anyone to use first names in address or conversation. Mr. Scobie does not even enjoy his music anymore, and as he remembers the images which used to be inspired by the music, he also remembers that in his younger, healthier days, he had thought that he “would preserve images of rapture somewhere inside him for those times ahead when he would need to be comforted.” But now, here at St. Christopher and St. Jude, where he needs to be comforted, “there’s no dignity…the only memories existing for him were the sad and painful. He could not recall anything from those treasures he once thought he was putting away safely for later.”

Elizabeth Jolley’s descriptions and her lively and psychologically revealing scenes are both ironic and often very funny, despite their dark edges and the novel’s pervading sadness. An undercurrent of sexuality runs through the novel, and ever so slowly, as she lets her characters hark back to events in their pasts, the sympathetic reader is jolted by sudden recognitions, suggesting some of the reasons these “nice,” “sweet” characters may be in the nursing home. The suggestions remain suggestions, however, with alternative explanations for behavior still possible, and as some characters pass away, the transience of life, and even more importantly, the transience of their memories raise inescapable questions for the reader regarding his/her own life. Jolley is a world class author, capable of creating serious questions and developing the biggest of the world’s themes within small settings and scenes, and I can hardly wait to read the next book being released, MISS PEABODY’S INHERITANCE. Persea Books has announced its intention to release in the US all of Elizabeth Jolley’s works, and I will be first in line! She is a new Favorite!

ALSO by Jolley:  MISS PEABODY’S INHERITANCE and FOXYBABY

Photos, in order: The author’s photo shows Elizabeth Jolley upon receiving honorary doctorate from Curtin University of Technology in Australia.   http://john.curtin.edu.au

The photo of the elderly man at the window, by Mihai Molceanu, is from http://www.medievaltours.com

The recently demolished house, similar to that faced by one of the characters here, is from http://www.silverspringscommunity.com

An old man walks along the railroad tracks, as did one of the men here.  Photo by Christopher Elwell: http://fineartamerica.com

Patients gamble in the facility at night. From http://www.emuleday.com

ARC: Persea Books

Elizabeth Taylor–ANGEL

“Kindly raise your coruscating beard from those iridescent pages of shimmering tosh and permit your mordant thoughts to dwell for one mordant moment on us perishing in the coruscating workhouse, which is where we shall, without a doubt, find ourselves, among the so-called denizens of deep-fraught penury if we [publish] such brilliant balderdash.”—Willie Brace to his partner Theo Gilbright on publishing Angel’s first novel.

Those who have loved author Elizabeth Taylor’s Mrs. Palfrey at the Claremont (published in 1971 as a novel and released in 2005 as a film starring Dame Joan Plowright) will undoubtedly be fascinated also by Angel (published in 1957 as a novel and released as a film in 2007).  Angel, less subtle in its black humor and obvious satire, will strike chords among all writers and lovers of writing who have ever, in their wildest imaginations, fantasized about producing a blockbuster novel, or even a moderately successful one.  Taylor (1912 – 1975) lived her own life in relative obscurity, admired and praised by a small group of literati, including Barbara Pym, Ivy Compton-Burnett, and Robert Liddell, but she is now being republished by New York Review Books, and contemporary lovers of clever writing will now rejoice in her unique vision of what it takes to be a successful author of popular novels and her insights into why popular fame often fades.

In 1900, Angel Deverell, fifteen, lives with her mother above the family grocery store in Norley.  Emotionally, however, she lives on a completely different plane, imagining a life in which she is elegant, successful, admired by all, and, of course, wealthy beyond her most fervent dreams.  Her mother and her aunt have made enormous sacrifices so that she can attend a private school and get the kind of education which might allow her to live a different sort of life from theirs.  Angel has always believed that she is destined for greatness, however, and she has little appreciation of the family’s sacrifices, feeling in the core of her being that her success is predestined,  inevitable, and deserved.

Angel’s Aunt Lottie has worked as a maid at Paradise House for years, and Angel lives as a child of the Paradise House elite in her imagination.  She even shares a name with Angelica, the daughter of Lottie’s “Madam,” at Paradise House, only a month of two older than she.  When Angel, on the way home from school one day, tells two schoolmates that her mother will one day inherit Paradise House – that she was disinherited because she married “beneath herself” – the story is circulated, and her mother and aunt are outraged.  “I would rather have seen you dead at my feet than let you bring this disgrace on me,” her mother tells her.”

Portrait by George Frederick Watts, which Angel donates to a local art society in an effort to be accepted.

Angel solves the humiliation problem by announcing that she will never return again to school.  Instead she will finish writing a romantic novel,  The Lady Urania, set at “Haven Castle,” on which she works almost around the clock, and she is sure it will be a success. When she goes to the library and sees the name of a publisher of a popular novel, she sends the manuscript off, then travels alone to London to talk with them. The publisher’s wife has read the book and found it hilariously entertaining, but he wants some changes:  he wants Angel to give the Duchess of Devonshire a fictional name; he wants a change in a men’s card game in which the winner of a wager will get to “lie with” Urania; and he demands that she change the graphic nature of the childbirth scene.  Angel risks all and says “No,” and eventually the publisher, seeing the potential sales for the novel, accedes to her demands.  The book is a huge popular success.

The Return of Persephone, by Frederic Leighton, the inspiration for a "Greek" character in another novel.

Writing a bestseller a year for the next five or six years,  Angel  continues her story with its ups and downs for forty more years, as her personal life and her literary life experience dramatic changes.  Always front and center in her focus – after herself, of course – is Paradise House, the epitome of elegant living for Angel from the beginning of her life.

Written in the middle of Taylor’s career, Angel often feels like the kind of romantic melodrama that Angel herself writes, and lovers of serious literary fiction may find it hard to get used to that style, at least at the beginning .  Eventually, it becomes clear that the author is suggesting Angel’s own style to give added irony and satire to her depiction of this character whose egocentrism knows no bounds.  Focusing always on just one thing, her own happiness, Angel is not only one-sided but completely indifferent to the rest of the world.  She feels no shame in relentlessly using others for her own ends, leading one character to remark, “I think that the secret of your power over people [as a novelist] is that you communicate with yourself, not with your readers.”  She “travels” through her imagination to classical Greece and Venice, always interested in a romantic story and caring little for historical accuracy.

Such an egocentric focus can be somewhat wearing on the reader, since it allows for very little character development.  Though we come to know Angel extremely well, she remains one-sided and shallow, unconcerned with the everyday niceties that make social life successful – a not even slightly likable character who does not change significantly and whose success one cares about primarily because it moves the plot.  Even through two world wars, Angel’s focus is on Angel and not on the outside world.  “I would not lift a finger to help the war in any way,” she announces, declaring her pacifism as an excuse.   As her fortunes change over more than forty years, Angel remains resolute, and it is in her resolve that she becomes more than just a satiric main character and becomes almost admirable.  Similar in style and focus to authors Barbara Pym, Penelope LivelyAlice Thomas Ellis (Amazon link), and Jane Gardam, Elizabeth Taylor, a generation older than they, may finally be getting the literary attention she deserves. New York Review Books has already published another Taylor novel, A Game of Hide and Seek, and a complete collection of her short stories was released by Virago in June.

ALSO by Elizabeth Taylor:  MRS. PALFREY AT THE CLAREMONT,     A GAME OF HIDE AND SEEK, A VIEW OF THE HARBOUR

VIDEO: ANGEL was made into a film by Francois Ozon in 2007. I have not seen it, but the trailer suggests that Angel is a more complex character here than she is in the novel.  The trailer is here:

Photos, in order: The author’s photo is from http://www.littlebrown.co.uk\

When Angel becomes successful, she donates a painting by George Frederick Watts to the local art society in an effort to be accepted.  She is surprised to hear that at least one person she had hoped to impress was shocked by her lack of taste.  Seehttp://www.all-art.org

Angel’s decision to set a novel in Greece is accomplished quickly – by changing the name of the main character from Emmelina to Persephone, keeping the plot the same, and imagining “dazzling marble and diaphanous draperies” in the style of Frederick Lord Leighton, her favorite artist.  “The Return of Persephone” by Leighton is found on http://ihategracefulpeople.blogspot.com

When the master of Paradise House dies, the house falls into disrepair and risks being vandalized or set afire as has happened with this old country house:http://www.geograph.org.uk. Copyright by Texas Radio and The Big Beat

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »