Feed on
Posts
Comments

Benjamin Black–VENGEANCE

“There was something about [Quirke] that [Sylvia] felt she could trust. It was not that he seemed particularly warm or sympathetic. Quite the opposite, in fact. She felt he was the kind of man she could speak to precisely because of a certain coolness, a certain stoniness, she detected in him….indifference.”

Fans of the previous four novels in the Quirke series by “Benjamin Black,” the pen name of Booker Prize-winning author John Banville, will celebrate the publication of this sixth novel of the Dublin-based series, set in the 1950s. Continuing all the main characters from previous novels, Black spends little time rehashing the sometimes sordid history of their relationships. Instead, he picks up where he left off with A Death in Summer, with few references to the characters’ backgrounds from previous novels.

Quirke, a Dublin physician at the Hospital of the Holy Family, is still running the pathology lab, and he has finally resolved an old wound by reuniting with his wary daughter Phoebe Griffin. Brought up as the child of Quirke’s stepbrother Malachy and never informed until recently as to her real parentage, Phoebe is somewhat leery of Quirke, not really knowing how to treat him or what he expects. Quirke, a long-time friend of Police Detective Inspector Hackett, is still available for private consultations with him, especially when the real reasons for a death may be in dispute, and he has no objections to accompanying Hackett on investigations or calls to bereaved families when they involve conversations with Dublin’ elite. Quirke is well known and has been part of that social group, whereas Hackett is more comfortable with his buddies at the pub.

Both Hackett and Quirke become involved with an investigation at the beginning of this novel when Victor Delahaye, the main partner in Delahaye and Clancy, an old company with a flourishing automobile repair business, invites the young son of his partner Jack Clancy to accompany him on a sail. Young Davy Clancy hates sailing, and has no idea why Jack, whom he does not know well, makes such an issue of having him as the only passenger. This trip does not make Davy like sailing any better. When he and Delahaye are far from land, Delahaye pulls out a gun and kills himself. Davy, terrified by the death, the blood, and the horror of having witnessed such a ghastly scene, inexplicably throws the gun overboard, then has to wait with the exsanguinating body until he is rescued by a passing boat. Quirke, upon examining the body, confirms that the bullet had to have been self-inflicted, and he accompanies Inspector Hackett when he interviews the not-so-bereaved family.

Slievemore Bay

The bay from the side of Slievemore, the place where Victor Delahaye and Davy Clancy went for a sail.

The remainder of the novel involves the search to discover why Victor Delahaye committed suicide, but a major complication arises (as it always does), when yet another death occurs at sea, this one far more complicated.

Black’s style has always been to keep things simple throughout and to write clear, concise prose, and no reader will have trouble keeping track of the characters, their motivations, and how their actions evolve from within. At his most incisive, Black has always placed those characters firmly within the 1950s milieu of Dublin society, allowing the action to turn on personalities and their predicaments. Here he develops insights into the Delahaye family, which includes Mona, Victor’s much younger, acquisitive wife; Victor’s handsome and amoral identical twins, Jonas and James, and Victor’s unmarried sister Marguerite (Maggie), conveying their values or lack of them. The Clancy family, smaller, consists of Jack’s benighted wife Sylvia and their timid son Davy, who seems unable to perform an assertive act. All the men in both families have lovers, adding to the turmoil, and the Delahaye twins are also friends with David Sinclair, Quirke’s assistant, who happens to be Quirke’s daughter Phoebe’s lover.

Vengeance by Benjamin Black, Mainie Jellett Painting

Mainie Jellett (1897 – 1944) was the first Irish artist to paint in the abstract style. One of her paintings adorned the Delahaye living room.

While these characters are being introduced, Quirke himself is also dealing with issues. His long-time problems with alcohol continue, though he seems to be gaining better control over them, and his love life is a constantly changing melodrama. He is anxious to restart a previously failed relationship with a woman he now believes he loves.

Those new to the series may become completely absorbed in the mystery and its revelations about characters, but those who have read the entire series so far (and I’ve read them all) may wonder, sadly, if the series has played itself out. The new characters are static and verge on stereotypes, and Quirke fails to grow or develop in new ways. The expected twists in the story do come with the kind of suddenness one expects of such mysteries, but they are simple twists, uncomplicated, and many readers may figure out some of the “surprises” – and the ending – before they occur. Vengeance can often be complex, and it is certainly a major motivating factor here, but the sometimes elegant simplicity which Black has made a trademark in the earlier novels, becomes merely simplistic here.

Also reviewed here:  A DEATH IN SUMMER,    THE BLACK-EYED BLONDE,     CHRISTINE FALLS,       THE SILVER SWAN,     EVEN THE DEAD (Quirke)

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.benjaminblackbooks.com/aboutauthor.htm

A view of the bay from the side of Slievemore, where Delahaye was Commodore of the Yacht Club and where he took Davy Clancy on his sailboat:  http://www.docbrown.info

Mainie Jellett (1897 – 1944) was Ireland’s first abstract artist.  According to http://www.askaboutireland.ie, which was also the source of this photo, Her work was influenced by French Cubism and she spent some time in Paris , with fellow abstract painter Evie Hone, learning from French artists Andre Lhote and Albert Gleizes.”

ARC: H. Holt

Note: This book was WINNER of the Costa Award for Biography in 2011.  It was also WINNER of the Ondaatje Prize.

“I know that my family were Jewish, of course, and I know they were staggeringly rich, but I really don’t want to get into the sepia saga business, writing up some elegiac Mitteleuropa narrative of loss…It could write itself, this kind of story. A few stitched-together wistful anecdotes…a bit of wandering around somewhere photogenic…some clippings from Google about ballrooms in the Belle Epoque.  It would come out as nostalgic. And thin.  I’m not entitled to nostalgia about that lost wealth and glamour…and I am not interested in thin.”—Prologue, Edmund De Waal, fifth generation of Ephrussis, here.

With this candid Prologue, author Edmund De Waal attempts to dispel any misgivings a reader might have about reading this book, which is the story of five generations of an impossibly wealthy family, their collection of art, their enormous houses, and especially their collection of over two hundred, antique Japanese netsuke, tiny sculptures which were originally used as fasteners for the purses that Japanese men wore around their waists. The book could easily have become the “sepia saga” the author has disdained in the Prologue. He offers even more caveats, too, emphasizing that this is not going to be a melancholy book, though the family lost virtually everything during World War II.  “Melancholy,” he says,  “is a sort of default vagueness, a get-out clause, a smothering lack of focus,” and he wants to convey, in discussing the collection of netsuke which he has inherited, that they are not only real and tactile, they are “small, tough explosion[s] of exactitude.  [They] deserve this sort of exactitude in return.”

His decision to write this “exacting” book comes when he realizes “that I can either anecdotalise [the netsuke story] for the rest of my life…or go and find out what it means.”   He has heard himself at dinner “entertaining” guests with the story, and he is embarrassed by his own behavior:  “[The story] isn’t just getting smoother, it is getting thinner,” he observes.  “I must sort it out now or it will disappear.”  Giving up his work as a highly recognized, world-class potter for several months (which eventually grows to be almost two years of intermittent research), he determines to discover his family history and the history of his netsuke.

DeWaalHotelEphrussiParis-300x259

The Ephrussi house in Paris

In Paris, he finds the family’s mansion on Rue Monceau, which in 1871 was lined with elaborate houses built by newly rich families.  His family, the Ephrussis, had “owned” the grain market in Odessa, becoming one of the greatest grain exporters in the world, and their house is a grand one.  He begins with the tale of twenty-one-year-old Charles Ephrussi, who arrives in Paris just as the house is being finished, then goes to Italy for a year of study, where he begins the first of his art collections and writes a “vanity book” about Albrecht Durer. Returning to Paris, where he has no interest in the family grain hare_amber_eyes-group2-300x291business, he writes art commentary for the Gazette, which he eventually buys.  The author does not hide the fact that Charles, as a character, does not much appeal to him at this stage – he thinks him “ridiculously affluent, very self-directed, and much, much too rich for his own good,” a feeling the reader shares.  Charles is, however, active among artists and writers, including poet Jules Lafourgue; Proust, for whom he was a model for Swann;  Renoir, who presents him in black coat and hat in the background of the “Luncheon of the Boating Party”; Monet who may also have used him in the same costume in the center of “Les Bains de la Grenouillere”; Degas, from whom he bought several paintings; and Manet, from whom he bought a painting of a bundle of asparagus. Eventually, he acquires forty major impressionist paintings displayed three deep on the walls of the newly built house.  Always in the forefront, he is one of the first to absorb a new spirit sweeping the art world with the opening of Meiji Japan – “japonisme,” with its “air of eroticized possibility.”  Eventually, he acquires thirty-three black lacquer boxes, an assortment of Japanese erotica kept in vitrines, and an incredible, two hundred sixty-four hand carved netsuke, which were already antiques when he bought them.  These netsuke, the author emphasizes, “were the first things that have any connection to every day life.”

The man in the back with the black top hat is identified as Charles Ephrussi.

The man in the back with the black top hat is identified as Charles Ephrussi.

By the 1880s, however, the new Jewish “aristocracy” in France, like Charles Ephrussi, are being blamed for the collapse of a large Catholic bank and a decline in the general economy.  Though they are praised for their patronage of the arts, the Jews are loathed as upstarts.  The Dreyfuss Affair from 1894 – 1906, further stokes the anti-Semitic fires in Paris, and Renoir, Cezanne, and Degas (the most virulent anti-Semite of them all), from whom Charles, an active patron, has bought many paintings, all distance themselves from him.  Charles’s artistic tastes have also changed, and he is now collecting eighteenth century French paintings.  When Viktor, Charles’s youngest cousin, gets married, Charles seizes the opportunity to ship the vitrine and its two hundred sixty-four netsuke to Vienna as his wedding gift.

Charles Ephrussi is also identified as the man in the center left, looking at the boats.

Charles Ephrussi is also identified as the man in the center left, looking at the boats in this painting by Monet.

The Vienna house “makes the Paris house of the Ephrussi look demure,” the author notes, and Vienna is even more overtly anti-Semitic than Paris.  The vitrine of netsuke is displayed in Viktor’s wife’s dressing room, and the family’s four children play with them as toys when they visit her room.   The influx of hungry immigrants after the break-up of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, combines with the resentment of the Jews, and anti-Semitism increases even more. In 1922, the novel The City Without Jews, by Hugo Bettauer is already debating the “final solution” for the Jews, and as Hitler begins his rise to power, Viktor’s four children go in many different directions – to Mexico, England, and the US.  None of the family treasures and none of the fortune survives the Anschluss.  In 1946, Viktor’s son Iggie goes to Japan – with the netsuke.  How he was able to acquire them from looted Austria, is another amazing story revealed here.  He remains there for the rest of his life, then bequeaths the netsuke to the author.  They remain in their vitrine in the author’s studio, the doors always unlocked so that the De Waal children can take them out, play with them, and even carry them in a pocket for luck, if they want to.

The Palais Ephrussi in Vienna is now the Vienna Casino.

The Palais Ephrussi in Vienna is now the Vienna Casino.

Considering the esoteric subject matter, the hypnotic charm of this biography comes as a complete surprise.  Though I had expected the book to be good, I had no idea how quickly and how thoroughly it would engage and ultimately captivate my interest. Through this sensitive author/artist, the reader shares the quest for information, delights in the discovery of new aspects of his family history, and thrills at his ability to connect not only with his ancestors but with the netsuke themselves.  Ultimately, he connects, too, with the reader, who cannot help but feel privileged to have been a part of this author’s journey of discovery.  My Favorite Non-fiction Book of 2012.

Note: A wonderful video interview with the author and a display of his netsuke show clearly the feelings which infuse the author’s search during this incredible book.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.bbc.co.uk, along with a fascinating interview.

The Ephrussi house in Paris: from http://was-stalin-a-rothschild.blogspot.com

The Hare with Amber Eyes and some of the other netsuke: from http://blogs.getty.edu

Renoir’s “Luncheon of the Boating Party,” with Charles Ephrussi identified in background in black top hat:  from http://en.wikipedia.org

Monet’s “Les Bains de la Grenouillereis a painting that Charles Ephrussi owned.  Some have suggested that he is the black-dressed figure in the center left.  From http://tokyojinja.com/ This site has some wonderful commentary on the Ephrussi family and its paintings.

The Palais Ephrussi, Vienna, designed by Theophil von Hansen now a casino: http://artandhockey.blogspot.com/

THE HARE WITH AMBER EYES
Review. Art. Biography, Japan, Netsuke, Literary. Austria, Book Club Suggestions, England, France, Historical, Non-fiction, Social and Political Issues, Ukraine
Written by: Edmund De Waal
Published by: Picador
Date Published: 10/27/2015
Edition: Reprint
ISBN: 978-0312569372
Available in: Ebook Paperback Hardcover

“Invent a good cover story…and whatever you do, don’t screw it up. Otherwise, there’s a very good chance you’re going to start World War Three.”

Daniel Silva, who was a journalist for years before he became a novelist, has always taken care to create plots that relate directly to political and historical realities. The involvement of the papacy in the Holocaust and their efforts to hide it, the indoctrination and training of an American terrorist in Yemen, the actions of a Russian oligarch and lethal arms dealer, and the attempts of a former obersturmfuhrer, now living in Vienna, to wipe out all traces of the Holocaust have all been subjects of his thrillers. This novel, however, comes closest to dealing with immediate issues of world politics, illustrating clearly and unambiguously some of Israel’s most pressing difficulties with its Arab neighbors and confirming our worst fears for the future of the Middle East. In doing so, Silva goes way beyond the facts that we all understand from the media, elucidating the complexities and the commitments of both the Arabs and the Jews to preserving “their own” land and especially Jerusalem.

Gabriel Allon, Silva’s hero for twelve of his fifteen novels, now sixty, is a former artist whose early work for Israeli intelligence included being the instrument of vengeance against the assassins of Israeli athletes at the Olympics. None of the assassins escaped his wrath. Unfortunately, other assignments on behalf of Mossad, almost equally bloody, led also to the killing of his beloved young son, Dani, an event so traumatic for his wife that she has been hospitalized and unable to function emotionally ever since.  Allon, his heart broken, no longer has the inspiration to paint and now works as an art restorer, often for the Vatican. There, he recently saved the life of the Pope during an al-Qaeda attack on St. Peter’s Square which killed many others. Though he has officially retired from Mossad, he has often answered the call to serve on special assignments, staying in touch with the men with whom he has risked his life for over thirty years.

In this novel, Allon is restoring “The Deposition of Christ,” widely regarded as Caravaggio’s finest painting.  When the body of a female curator in the antiquities department is found beneath the Michelangelo-designed dome of the basilica one night, Msgr. Luigi Donati, described as “a clerical Rasputin” and “the true power behind the papal throne,” brings Allon to the site of the death.  Claudia Andreatti appears to have committed suicide by jumping from the walkway around the base of the dome, the highest dome in the world. Both men conclude that this death was probably murder, something they intend to keep quiet. Claudia had been investigating the provenance of the Egyptian and Etruscan artifacts stored at the Vatican, and she may have uncovered evidence of a major plot to bring stolen antiquities from Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt into Rome, with the money from their sales being laundered through Vatican accounts to benefit unknown outside sources.

While Claudia’s death is being quietly investigated, Allon learns from Shimon Pazner at the Israeli Embassy that Hezbollah, aided by Iran, may be planning a major attack on an unknown Israeli site somewhere in Europe. When Allon follows up on this by going to Israel to talk with Intelligence, he also learns that the Palestinians in Jerusalem have been systematically excavating beneath Temple Mount, trying to find and destroy any evidence that the Jews once had a temple on the site, built much earlier than the mosque that is currently there. The militant Palestinians already deny the Holocaust, and if they can prevent evidence from being discovered about the early temple on the site, they believe they can inspire Muslims around the Middle East to attack and eliminate Israel from the land they claim exclusively as their own.

Eventually, these two plots coincide, but not before Silva has explored the complexities of the financial dealings at the Vatican; the hidden world of the antiquities market and its financing; the personal alliances within the Vatican and within Rome itself; and the financial and cultural interconnections among the Palestinians, Hezbollah, and Iran, especially as they relate to the future of Israel.   As the violence which always seems to accompany Gabriel Allon continues, no compromise among the various adversaries seems possible, making the reader even more aware of the increasing tensions of the area and the unlikelihood that any solution, other than war, will be the result.

Silva spends time, at the end of the book, discussing the situation regarding Egypt, with its ninety million people and its current non-functioning, but militantly anti-Israeli government, giving detailed information about the anarchic Sinai peninsula and the immediate threat it represents to Israel.  He also describes President Clinton’s meetings in 2000 with both Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat at which he negotiated the terms of a peace agreement in which a Palestinian state would be created in the Gaza strip.  The Palestinians would also gain ninety-six percent of the West Bank. “The Temple Mount plateau, sacred to the three Abrahamic faiths, would [be] included in the Palestinian state, while the Western Wall and the Jewish Quarter of the Old City would remain under Israeli control.” Ehud Barak accepted the terms, but, in a surprising turn of events, Arafat did not. “President Clinton was remarkably candid about his feelings toward the man whose ‘colossal mistake’ had denied him a historic foreign policy achievement.  ‘I am a failure,’ he told Arafat during a bitter telephone conversation. ‘And you have made me one.’ ”

Silva concludes:

“At some point soon, Middle East watchers agree, there is likely to be another eruption of violence, a third intifada. Bombs will explode, bullets will fly, and children on both sides of the long and bloody contest over the twice-promised land will die. And…it would have ended more than a decade ago if Yasser Arafat had only found the courage to speak a single word: ‘Yes.’ ”

This novel makes many of the issues involved in this problem far more vivid than they have ever been before in fiction, at least for me, and those who are interested in the future of the Middle East will not want to miss this thriller, one of Silva’s best.

ALSO reviewed here:  Silva’s THE CONFESSOR,     THE ENGLISH GIRL,     and      THE HEIST

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.readersdigest.com.au

“The Deposition from the Cross” by Caravaggio (1602 – 1603) is the painting on which Gabriel Allon is doing some restoration. http://en.wikipedia.org

The Dome of St. Peter’s, designed by Michelangelo, is shown on http://en.wikipedia.org

The al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock, pictured here, are further described on http://www.atlastours.net

 

“Death was waiting in the house like a bailiff.”

Alice Thomas Ellis (real name: Anna Haycraft) belonged to that brilliant group of twentieth century British women who entertained and enlightened the world with their writing in the 1970s and 1980s.  This group, which also included Beryl Bainbridge, Penelope Lively, Muriel Spark, Jane Gardam, Elizabeth Taylor, and Barbara Pym, wrote darkly humorous, frequently satiric, and psychologically astute novels about women and families facing crises, but Ellis’s novels, sometimes set in Wales, have an extra dimension.  Her novels often have spiritual overtones, not in the sense of her religious commitment, though she was a devout Catholic, but in the sense of connection to folk traditions and even, sometimes, to magic.

Ellis’s debut novel, The Sin Eater (1977), pays homage to the Welsh tradition of the “sin eater,” someone from the rural countryside who would come to the household of a recently deceased person and enact a short ritual in which s/he would “eat” the sins of the deceased so that the recently departed could safely pass on to a happy afterlife. In this novel, the Anglo-Welsh patriarch of an old family is dying in Llanelys, and his children and their spouses gather at the estate to await the end. Rose, the Irish wife of the oldest son Henry, is the sensible mother of twins who has worked to restore the estate and its gardens, make it a home, and, through her cooking, provide a sense of family warmth.

In sardonic contrast to her is Angela, the oh-so-upperclass wife of the second son Michael, who looks down on Rose and everyone else not of the family’s “class” and breeding. Arriving sometime later is the only daughter, Ermyn, young, schoolgirlish, and disturbed. Severely repressed and often ignored, she looks for answers in exotic religious expression, and like the sin eater of Welsh legend, believes she can take upon herself the sins of the Captain and the family.

Ellis wields language like a rapier, skewering family members for their caste-conscious concern with their “blood,” and showing with mordant humor their deliberate separation from the community. The family is changing, if Rose, daughter of an Irish veterinarian, is any indication, just as Llanelys, now a tourist destination, has changed.

But though the family may deserve to be satirized for its meaningless rituals, the local population is not exempt from Ellis’s dissection either. Phyllis, the caretaker for the Captain, saves the best of the family’s food to feed her obese grandson, and he steals liquor and makes lewd, sexual overtures to Rose and Ermyn. Other townspeople mock the family and even break windows.

Delicious turns of phrase and lively dialogue make the narrative sparkle. The hands of Rose’s small twins are described as “so delicate and fine they felt like broken toothpicks in little silk bags,” while the sea is “smooth and wrinkle-free, like the face of a saint or a psychopath.” References to old Welsh legends connect the family with the past and offer dire portents of the future.

.

Another Ellis novel, one of my all-time favorites,  is PILLARS OF GOLD:

“Barbs went around asking to be murdered.”

Here Alice Thomas Ellis pokes gentle fun at contemporary working-class society, populating her novel with adults who are pot-smoking ex-hippies, kids who cut school in order to drink and play at being more grownup than their parents, and various friends, including a gypsy who peddles hot merchandise, her unfaithful Turkish lover, and Barbs, a self-conscious and obnoxious do-gooder – who also turns out to be a missing person. Taking pot-shots at the advertising business, the press, psychiatrists, school systems, nuts-and-granola nutritionists, marriage, parent/child conflicts, and the tendency of people to avoid getting involved – Ellis crafts a hilarious tale based on the discovery in a nearby canal of a body which matches the description of the missing neighbor Barbs.

No one is saying who the victim is, and the police, in fact, do not even know that Barbs is missing. Her neighbors have not reported her absence for fear of being wrong–“We do not want to make idiots of ourselves.” As days pass and Barbs remains missing, each of the neighbors comes up with reasons for believing that her absence is temporary and that she will return. It is not until the teenage children of the main characters decide to have a dinner party in Barbs’s empty house, discovering many clues in the process, that the matter of her absence gains critical importance.

Revealing most of her information about character through their actions and unusually clever dialogue, Ellis presents a series of intimate dramatic scenes, usually between two characters whose conversations and reactions to each other’s comments show the author’s psychological insights – parents and children miscommunicate, married couples avoid issues, friends tell each other what they want to hear. Not a word is wasted in this very sly and beautifully detailed story filled with irony.

Note: If you have not yet have discovered the clever novels of Alice Thomas Ellis, one of my favorite (and, unfortunately, almost forgotten) authors,  these two books would be good places to start.  She’s too good a writer to let  fall through the cracks.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo, as seen in the SIN EATER review, appears on http://www.listal.com. The additional author photo, shown in the PILLARS OF GOLD review, is by Mark Gerson/Camera Press in
http://www.nytimes.com.

The Llanerchaeron Garden in Wales, perhaps similar to the garden which Rose restored in The Sin Eater, appears on http://www.gardenvisit.com. Photo by Pete Duxon.

“ ‘Suppose’ was one of Harry Chapman’s most-used words, to the irritation at times of his friends and relatives. He liked to suppose where others stated, secure in their certainties. He favoured suppositions, those delicate stepping stones towards truth.’ ”

Seventy-year-old Harry Chapman has just been admitted to a hospital for diagnosis and treatment of an illness from which he has been suffering alone at home. Confined to bed for the foreseeable future, Harry, a writer, cannot help sharing his thoughts and “suppositions” with the reader and sometimes the hospital staff, recreating conversations and bringing family members, friends, and literary characters to life. But Harry does not stop there. Books, poems, plays, and paintings are also a vivid part of his on-going reality, and some of Harry’s favorite literary characters and his most admired fellow writers cross the borders of reality and fiction to work their way into his memories of real people and real events. His attention constantly jumps around, but it is through these seemingly random memories, stories, favorite poems, and observations about life that author Paul Bailey succeeds in bringing Harry to life and creating a “real” person for the reader.

When he first meets his doctor, Harry remarks that the doctor “reminds him” of someone, finally deciding that the doctor looks like the self-portrait by Filippino Lippi in the fresco at the Brancacci Chapel of Santa Maria del Carmine in Florence. When the doctor gives him an injection, Harry begins “chatting” with Bartleby, the Scrivener, in Herman Melville’s novel of the same name. When a priest visits him at his bedside, Harry indicates that he has his own spiritual resources, then conjures up George Herbert, John Donne, and Marcus Aurelius, among others, and “serenades” one of the nurses with Shakespeare’s Sonnet 18, “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day…” Other poems follow for other nurses and other occasions.

Among Harry’s recollections, however, are gloomy memories of his dour and hurtful mother Alice, “the perpetual dampener of every prideful feeling, her bottomless bucket of ice-cold water perpetually at hand.” Though he also remembers his father’s last day alive, during which his father sees the ghosts of his mates in the trenches of war, it is his mother whose constant presence so upsets him. “It was because he was here – trapped, and dependent upon nurses and doctors – that his restless mind was taken up with old slights, old scores, old barriers to his once longed-for liberty,” he explains to the reader. And as he asks Dr. Pereira to cure him, he is surprised to be answered by Pip, whom he asks whether he ever married Estella in Great Expectations. He recalls visiting the cemetery in Calcutta where one of Dickens’s sons was buried; remembers Henry IV, Part I, in which he once acted; calls up Jack Hawkins to act as his own lookout, instead of Long John Silver’s; and remembers the friend who introduced him to Babar and Celeste, at whose elephant wedding he imagines Fred Astaire dancing with Celeste (whom Astaire compliments, saying that she has “a finer feel for the music, for the rhythm, than Ginger Rogers”).

As thoughts of Virginia Woolf, Malcolm Lowry, and many other authors drift through Harry’s befogged consciousness, he is also meeting new (real) people on the ward and revealing more private information about his own life – his friends, his enemies, and his lovers. Harry becomes increasingly lifelike for the reader as he awaits the arrival of his closest friend, Graham Weaver, due to arrive soon from Sri Lanka.

Though Harry can be a literary showoff, the reader comes to understand that the books he has read are part of who he is, and as he has shown with his poems to the nurses, the world of literature is the best way he knows to communicate with the outside world. As an author, “[Harry] read voraciously, then judiciously, and found his writing voice by rejecting the voices of those he was tempted to impersonate,” and he used to become frustrated by what he considered the inadequate literary backgrounds of his students. As he tells “Shakespeare’s ship-boy, Jack,” “You cannot write well unless you have read well. If you read trash, God help you, trash will be the result of your labours, if labours they are.”

Ultimately, he tells his students, “No one [can] possibly teach another person to write imaginatively. If you have no powers of observation and no insight into character and no flair for language, you cannot expect to be taught them.”

The play on words of the title, with the reminders of George Chapman’s ground-breaking translations of the Iliad (1598) and Odyssey (1616) and of romantic poet John Keats’s “On First Looking Into Chapman’s Homer” (1816), establish the fact that Harry Chapman’s stay in the hospital is his own odyssey, and though his memories do not seem to have one-to-one parallels with the voyage of Odysseus, they are as varied, traumatic, and even, sometimes, as captivating for him as those of Odysseus in his twenty years of wandering. Because Harry is bed-ridden for the entire duration of the novel and is not fully lucid during his stay, the reader must filter and process his reminiscences in order to understand and participate in his life.

Chapman’s Odyssey is a delightful and involving treasure trove for English majors and lovers of the classics, but it may be frustrating for those who do not share these interests or background. The dry humor and irony which accompany the limited (mostly intellectual) “action” of the novel depend fully upon the connections to literature; to the children’s books of the past, like Treasure Island; to famous paintings; to actors and entertainers from fifty years ago; and in one case, to Wimbledon stars of the past. Harry’s need to be loved is almost palpable, and as the reader shares his memories and envisions him-/herself in circumstances similar to Harry’s, the novel takes on a poignancy which cuts through all the intellectual posing to Harry’s inner core. Ultimately, author Paul Bailey has created a novel in which Harry becomes an everyman on an odyssey, one in which he seeks answers to life’s most basic questions of what life means and whether the journey has been worthwhile.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.guardian.co.uk

The portrait of Filippino Lippi from the Brancacci Chapel of the Santa Maria del Carmine is seen on http://www.paradoxplace.com

Fred Astaire is featured on http://psicologitaliani.wordpress.com/

Queen Celeste (from Babar) is on http://www.fanpop.com

The cover of  Chapman’s Odyssey is featured on http://press.princeton.edu

ARC:  Bloomsbury USA

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »