Feed on
Posts
Comments

Captivating story of discoveries and losses.

The search for dinosaur fossils amid sandstorms and desert heat is anything but dry in this lively story of the excavation in January, 2000, of a site in the western Egyptian desert, partially excavated by Ernst Stromer in 1911, but untouched since then. Nothdurft, a professional writer, working in concert with Josh Smith, the young paleontologist who was the team leader of the January, 2000, dig, tells the stories of both the 1911 and the 2000 excavations, along with the fossil discoveries made by each group.

Stromer, a German aristocrat and meticulous paleontologist, found the fossils of four unique, 95-million-year-old dinosaurs in Bahariya in 1911, spent twenty years analyzing them, and then supervised the fossils’ installation at the Bavarian State College of Paleontology and Historical Geology in Munich. In April, 1944, everything was lost in the allied bombing of Munich. The story of Stromer’s efforts, now almost forgotten, alternates with that of Smith and his group of young Ph.D’s from the University of Pennsylvania, who hope to find additional fossils in the same area in January, 2000.

Financed by a Los Angeles film company making a documentary, the crew ultimately unearths a 80 – 100 ton new dinosaur species, discovering in the process that at least two other equally gigantic dinosaur species shared space with this titan. How this desert area could support three such huge species becomes the question for the geologists on the trip, a mystery which Nothdurft imbues with immediacy and great excitement as they examine the confusing strata for clues.

Nothdurft excels in characterizing the paleontologists and geologists so that the reader can easily imagine participating in the dig along with them. His narrative is fast-paced and full of memorable detail–depictions of Bahariya, with its 130-degree heat and its scorpions, the excitement of the young researchers as they uncover new fossils, and their puzzlement at the paradoxes which unfold. With likeable researchers, and photos and drawings which make their discoveries come alive, this is a wonderful introduction to the challenges of on-site research, the scientific methods of the crew, and the respect with which they regard the past. Ultimately, even the almost-forgotten Ernst Stromer shares in their discoveries.

Notes: No photos of authors Nothdurft or Smith seem to be available.

The photo of Ernst Stromer comes from http://spinosauridae.fr.gd

One of the few surviving fossils of Stromer’s Spinosaurus appears in this photo:

http://www.dailykos.com

Orhan Pamuk–SNOW

Notes: Orhan Pamuk was WINNER of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2006.

“I am proud of the part of me that isn’t European. I’m proud of the things in me that the Europeans find childish, cruel, and primitive. If the Europeans are beautiful, I want to be ugly; if they’re intelligent, I prefer to be stupid; if they’re modern let me stay pure.”

The rich story-telling tradition of the Middle East enlivens Turkish author Orhan Pamuk’s novel about the residents of Kars, a town in the remote northeast corner of Turkey, as Kerim Alakusoglu, known as Ka, returns after many years to investigate a spate of suicides by young women forbidden to wear headscarves in school. Arriving during a blizzard, he feels as if it is “snowing at the end of the world,” and when the city is closed to all traffic for three days, “The desolation and remoteness…hit him with such force that he felt God inside him.”

Though Kars, which comes from the Turkish word for “snow,” was once a crossroads for trading between Turkey, Soviet Georgia, Armenia, and Iran, all of which are within a few miles of the town, it is now “the poorest and most overlooked corner of Turkey.” All the conflicting political and religious tensions of the country are seen here, its residents representing a melting pot of historical influences—socialism and communism, atheism, political secularism, ethnic nationalism (especially the Kurds), and the most rapidly growing movement, Islamist fundamentalism.

Ka has lived in Frankfurt for the past twelve years and has returned to Turkey only briefly for his mother’s funeral. A poet who has been unable to write anything for the past four years, he learns that Ipek, the woman he has always loved, is now single again and living in Kars. Traveling there ostensibly to interview the families of the “headscarf girls,” he secretly hopes to reconnect with Ipek and make her his wife. As Ka becomes reacquainted with Ipek, he also meets people from the most influential groups in Ka. Ipek’s father, Turgut Bey, is an old communist and atheist, now running the decrepit Snow Palace Hotel, and her sister, the lover of an Islamist militant named Blue, is one of the leaders of the headscarf girls. Ipek’s ex-husband, formerly non-religious, is now running for mayor as an Islamist. Ka’s bodyguards/government investigators tail him everywhere, and the army/police force is a constant presence, but this atmosphere, remarkably, inspires Ka’s creativity, and for the first time in years, he is able to write poetry.

As Ka investigates the girls’ suicides, he is most astonished by their “desperate speed.” Girls and women go about their ordinary lives, and suddenly, without warning, kill themselves. While some officials blame western media for publicizing the suicides, therefore encouraging more girls to kill themselves, the Department of Religious Affairs has plastered the city with “Suicide is Blasphemy” posters, and local Islamists have railed against it. Still the suicides continue, a local official informing Ka that “If unhappiness were a genuine reason for suicide, half the women of Turkey would be killing themselves.”

Other life and death issues come to the fore when Ka witnesses the coffee shop shooting of the Director of Education, the man who has, on orders from the government, banned the “headscarf girls” from the school campus. The assailant is a young member of the Freedom Fighters for Islamic Justice, and Ka soon meets and comes to know others associated with the movement and the leader responsible for it. The Director has been wearing a tape-recorder, and the reasoned dialogue with which he attempts to communicate with his assailant, and the assailant’s sane, but completely irrational, responses are stunning to a western reader.

Soon afterward, a military coup begins at the National Theater, which is packed to hear Ka read a poem and to see a traveling theatrical troupe perform a modern version of the “headscarf girls” story within the framework of an ancient play. Soldiers burst into the theater, shoot randomly into the audience, which thinks the shots are part of the show, kill a number of people, then round up “dangerous” citizens. Over the next two days, many others are sought, arrested, tortured, and killed, including some of the people Ka has interviewed and visited. Ultimately, as the three-day blizzard ends and Ka readies to leave Kars, Ipek must choose whether to go with him to Frankfurt or to stay in Kars with her family, a decision that is by no means clear-cut.

Different characters here find many different answers and just as many explanations for the underlying problems. As author Pamuk presents their various points of view, the reader finds the novel exploring broad philosophical and intellectual issues almost never tackled in western fiction, in addition to more specific issues related to poverty, modernization, technology, religious doubt, and freedom. The plot is exciting enough to keep a reader who is interested in politics, religion, and philosophy fully and enthusiastically occupied, but readers hoping primarily for an exciting story will find the pace slow as Pamuk explores his themes. The characters are intriguing, but they are more representative of types than individuals.

Many-leveled, beautifully wrought, and complex in its themes, this is a novel which thoughtful western readers will want to explore, a haunting novel rich with insights which should not be ignored. Packed with ironies, black humor, and enough symbols to keep a symbol-hunter busy for days, the novel draws attention to rapidly rising fundamentalist movements and some of the reasons they seek our destruction.

Notes:  Also reviewed here:  Pamuk’s  THE MUSEUM OF INNOCENCE

The author’s photo is from http://www.fullissue.com

Issues of the “headscarf girls” have affected numerous European countries in recent years:  http://www.loonwatch.com

The map of Turkey is from http://www.rooms-europe.de/images/mturkey.gif.  Kars is in the extreme northeast corner, beside the label for Armenia.

“I had admired his talent. After a while, I admired nothing else [about him]. Finally, I began to wonder about his talent.”

What began as a mentoring relationship between established Trinidadian novelist V. S. Naipaul and Paul Theroux, a young American writer working on his first novel, went on to endure as a “friendship” for thirty years as both writers traveled the world but remained in touch. They met when Theroux was a young ex-Peace Corp worker teaching in Uganda at the university in Makerere in 1966, and Naipaul, nine years his senior, became “writer-in-residence” there, though Naipaul hated teaching and mocked the writing of his students and the Makerere faculty. He did, however, recognize Theroux’s talent, and he did help and encourage him to get his novel published. Theroux, in turn, was an astute reader of Naipaul’s work, and both benefited from the relationship, at least at first.

From 1967 – 1977, Theroux published ten successful novels and short story collections, all of which Theroux describes in this book, and all were praised, at least privately, by Naipaul. Somewhat less attention is paid to the almost equal number of works published by Naipaul, some of which Theroux read and helped proofread. A crusty, critical, and often cruel man, full of contradictions, Naipaul was a difficult “friend,” and when he decided that he did not like someone, there was no turning back, no forgiveness for human failings. Theroux managed to navigate that minefield of hostility for thirty years.

In fact, shortly before the first of Naipaul’s novels was published in the United States, Theroux (in 1972) wrote an introductory biography and critical assessment of Naipaul’s work, full of praise for Naipaul, and helped to create an audience for Naipaul’s work in the United States. After this somewhat effusive work was published, however, Theroux refused further interviews or commentary about Naipaul, insisting that “I will never [again] write about Naipaul. He is my friend.” That declaration is belied by the publication of this book, the last twenty-percent of which is an uninterrupted excoriation of Naipaul and his second wife at the end of the friendship with Theroux. Here Theroux shows that he is at least as unforgiving as Naipaul, with a mean streak of his own.

In time Theroux would become a literary star with over forty novels and books of non-fiction. Naipaul, a painstaking, often philosophical writer, eventually won the Nobel Prize in 2001, and was knighted. Though this book is fascinating for its picture of the mentoring process and of a friendship which managed to survive despite the pettiness and frequent mean-spiritedness of Naipaul, it is also a portrait of Theroux, who published this book as his own enduring form of payback.

ALSO by Theroux,  THE LAST TRAIN TO ZONA VERDE (2013), about his journey from Capetown up the west coast of Africa     and     DARK STAR SAFARI, about his 2002 trip from Egypt to South Africa.

Notes: The author’s photo appears on his Facebook page.

A 1986 photo of V. S. Naipaul with Paul Theroux appears on http://www.telegraph.co.uk/

“The prospect of introducing salmon to the wadis of the Hadramawt seems to me, quite frankly, risible….  The project is not only totally absurd and scientifically nonsensical, but if we allow our name to be involved, no one in the fisheries world will ever take us seriously again.”

One of the most delightful and original satires I’ve read in ages, this debut novel pokes fun at just about every aspect of British society, from government spin-meisters and crass politicians to marriages of convenience, TV interview programs, consumerism, and the belief that many of the world’s problems would be solved if only other people were “more like us.”  What makes this satire particularly refreshing is that the author writes it with a smile on his face, obviously preferring to prick balloons with his witty needling, rather than wield a rapier in a slashing attack.

The absurdity begins on the first page, with a startling letter from an estate agent to Dr. Alfred Jones, a fisheries scientist whose crowning achievement to date is an esoteric paper entitled “The Effects of Increased Water Acidity on the Caddis Fly Larva.”  The agent, Harriet Chetwode-Talbot, has a client “with access to very substantial funds” who wants to sponsor a project to introduce Scottish salmon and the sport of salmon fishing into the wadis of the Yemen during the yearly rains.

Mild-mannered and unimaginative Alfred Jones ignores this letter, finding the whole idea ludicrous, until the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and eventually the prime minister, Jay Vent, exert the kind of pressure that makes refusal impossible.  The PM’s office favors this effort for its “environmental message,” the new links it will forge to a Middle Eastern country, the technological “improvements” it will bring to an Islamic state, and not incidentally, the huge, positive news story that just may push stories of Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia off the front page.

Through letters, e-mails, memos, diary entries, newspaper articles, records of the House of Commons, interviews, and even intercepted al-Qaeda e-mail traffic, the story of Alfred’s efforts to create a suitable environment for salmon in the mountains of western Yemen unfolds.  Gradually, Alfred becomes intrigued with the research possibilities of the project, and his contact with His Excellency Sheikh Muhammad ibn Zaidi bani Tihama, an avid salmon-fisherman who lives part of the year on a Scottish estate, introduces him to private jets, opportunities to travel, and a life that is more intriguing than anything he has experienced to date.

Alfred is married to Mary, a highly paid financial executive who works around the clock at her job in Geneva, where she expects to remain for two years.  They have just celebrated their twentieth anniversary, for which Alfred has given Mary a subscription to The Economist, and she has given him a new electric toothbrush.  Obviously, Alfred and Mary lack imagination, though neither of them seems to notice—until Alfred starts to open himself to the wider world with his new assignment.  Soon Alfred begins to resent Mary’s high-handed demands and her selfishness—and he finds Harriet Chetwode-Talbot, with whom he is constantly working, especially attractive.

Within a framework that includes the salmon project in the Yemen, Alfred’s love life (or lack of it), and the sheikh’s broad vision of a more peaceful world achieved through fishing, the author manages to poke fun at every aspect of modern life. Government officials, of course, take credit for all Alfred’s work, when it is going well, but deny responsibility when there are problems.  The foreign office believes that the Middle Eastern poor hate the British because they do not have the material benefits of western life.  The government’s communications expert proposes a “Voice of Britain” TV channel and a quiz show called “Prizes for the People,” in which some poor Iraqi whose house has been bombed can win a dishwasher.  Not even the “Bereavement Management Center,” which the army has set up to help families of servicemen, escapes the author’s attention and black humor.

As Alfred learns to “believe in belief,” thanks to the sheikh, his world expands, and when the prime minister insists on accompanying Alfred and the sheikh to the Yemen for the first release of ten thousand young salmon into the wadi, the scene is set for a grand finale.  Filled with timely observations which emphasize life’s absurdities, a cast of characters who are constantly entertaining (though some are loathsome), and a unique and well-developed story line, this novel breaks new ground.  There are not many satires that can be called “charming,” and there may be even fewer novels about salmon fishing that will completely captivate those of us who have never climbed into a set of waders.  (On my list of Favorites for 2007)

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.jennybrownassociates.com

The photo of the wadis of the Hadramawt shows the dry riverbed and tributaries of the Hadramawt Plateau:  http://www.vias.org

Salmon fishing in Ireland, demonstrated by premier salmon fly-fishing instructor in Ireland: http://www.ireland-salmon-fishing.net

“You have in one valley a village and you have in another valley another village and the people don’t even speak the same language. This makes it easy for the Arabs to give rewards to one tribe if they will join with the government. Yes, I’m sorry to report that many Nubans have been bribed to fight against their own people….Tribalism is the problem here, in all Sudan, in all of Africa. Who brought the first African slaves to the slave ships? Other Africans.”

Setting his massive, almost 700-page novel in Sudan and neighboring Kenya, Philip Caputo details the extraordinary efforts of non-government organizations (NGOs) from around the world to bring aid into “no-go” zones, those zones declared so dangerous that the UN will not enter. Many of these agencies ferry aid through the use of bush pilots and small airlines from Kenya, which fly into Sudan and land on hidden, usually make-shift, landing strips, often dodging small-arms fire and enemy aircraft when they try to return home. The Muslim government of Sudan, located to the north in Khartoum, has long been at war with the oil-rich, largely Christian south, and atrocities occur on a regular basis—the abduction of children for children’s armies, the rape and enslavement of women, the maiming and mutilation of the healthy, the cutting off of food and water, and the theft of medical supplies to prevent disease. Lacking weapons and ammunition, the rebel Sudanese People’s Liberation Army (SPLA) is no match for the heavily supplied army from Khartoum.

Caputo’s large cast of characters consists of the people who participate in the relief of Nuba, an oil-rich area in Sudan—Christian evangelists who bring aid and, through their missionaries, wish to convert the inhabitants; the International People’s Aid group, a humanitarian group from Canada, run by a former Catholic priest and supported by Kenyan philanthropists; German Emergency Doctors, which operates an understaffed and undersupplied local hospital; the mercenary pilots of small airlines which service the area and compete for business; and the shady owners of some of these airlines—along with members of the SPLA; a local Arab warlord allied with the Khartoum government; and members of the international press, most notably CNN.

Caputo’s intentions are to publicize the horror of this Sudanese civil war within a comprehensive novel, which also depicts the local population and the effects of the well-meaning aid workers upon its society. But he also wants to show that “In Sudan the choice is never between the right thing and the wrong thing but between what is necessary and what isn’t…In Sudan the necessary thing IS the right thing,” an ethical conundrum which gives the lie to absolute, conventional values. Planes flying aid are sometimes used to smuggle weapons; the desire to save lives on a massive scale sometimes involves the sacrifice of lives on a small scale.

The action is generated by characters who fly for Knight Air out of Kenya—Fitzhugh Martin, a mixed race Kenyan; Douglas Braithwaite, an American entrepreneur and pilot; and Wesley Dare, a Texas mercenary—along with their lovers, an Anglo-Kenyan philanthropist and a female Canadian pilot. A young female evangelical from Iowa, working in Sudan, becomes part of a third love story when she is attracted to a member of the SPLA.

The novel does not have a single focus. Instead, the author chooses a three-part focus—on the real atrocities of war and the real corruption of the Sudanese (and, not incidentally, the Kenyan) government; on the real, marginal lives, and the real tribal and religious conflicts of Sudanese people; and on the fictional lives, backgrounds, and relationships of the characters who drive the action of this novel. The lack of a single focus and the attempt to broaden the scope to include everyone who has a stake in Sudan leads to a very long, and “loose” novel. The fictional struggles and love stories of the aid workers and western do-gooders who wish to be a part of the solution in Sudan are given as much emphasis as the cultural and religious battles waged by the very real Sudanese.

Almost seven hundred pages long–with many of these pages devoted to providing detailed background information about the fictional characters (and even their parents)–the novel attempts to explain why they came to Africa, what they hope to accomplish, and what motivates them. The characters are people of action and impulse, however, not of thought and contemplation, and it is their actions, not their thinking, which drive the novel. Judicious editing of fictional backgrounds, especially at the beginning, could have shortened the novel significantly, tightened it thematically, and improved it dramatically.

The three love stories draw in the reader and keep the interest high, but they do dilute the impact of the war and atrocities in Sudan.

Caputo has a dark vision of man’s inner nature. When even a high-minded evangelical makes expedient decisions with horrifying results, and when intense love sputters out, then what is left? Caputo does not provide those answers, nor does the structure of the novel. In a conclusion dependent upon coincidence and melodrama, the reader is left with the idea that in this complex conflict between good and evil, the best one can hope for is a toss-up.

Notes: I must confess that when I tried to find photos to illustrate this review, the photos I found were so searing and so heart-rending, that I couldn’t find many that I could even post here.  If you want to know exactly what is happening in the southern Sudan, just go to Google or Yahoo and enter “south Sudan images.”  Be aware that what you will see represents the worst of starvation, especially as it affects children.

The author’s photo appears on his RandomHouse author page:  http://www.randomhouse.com

The poorly equipped Sudanese People’s Liberation Army tries to fight well-equipped forces from Khartoum, sometimes using boy soldiers:  http://www.dw-world.de

The map of Sudan is from http://www.ndlcms.org/

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »