Feed on
Posts
Comments

Virginia Woolf–ORLANDO

“The very fabric of life was magic.”

In her most playful and exuberant novel, Virginia Woolf writes the “historical biography” of Orlando, a young boy of nobility during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I. A wild ride through four centuries, the novel shows Orlando aging, magically, only thirty-six years between 1588 and 1928. Even more magically, he also changes from a man to a woman. As she explores Orlando’s life, Woolf also explores the differing roles of men and women in society during various periods, ultimately concluding that one’s role as a man or woman is determined by society, rather than by birth.

From the Elizabethan period, during which Orlando works as a steward for the queen and also serves as her lover, he progresses to the reign of James I, experiencing a profound love for a Russian princess, Sasha, who is herself exploring the role of a man. When the relationship ends, he retreats, devastated, to his estate, with its 365 rooms and 52 staircases, which he redecorates over the next few years. An interlude in which he is wooed by the Archduchess Harriet/Archduke Harry leads to his ambassadorship to Constantinople, a period spent with the gypsies, and his eventual return to England–as a woman. New experiences and observations await her there.

Throughout the novel, Woolf matches her prose style to the literary style of the period in which Orlando lives, creating always-changing moods and sheer delight for the reader. Some constants continue throughout the four centuries of Orlando’s life. Orlando is always a writer, always recording his thoughts, and always adding to a poem he has begun as a child entitled “The Oak Tree.” He is always returning to his 365-room house whenever he needs to recuperate from his experiences, and some characters repeat through time. (Orlando is betrayed by Nick Greene during the reign of James I, but he is encouraged by Nicholas Greene in the Victorian period.)

Literary historians make much of the fact that Woolf modeled Orlando on Vita Sackville-West, Woolf’s lover, and that this study of gender roles was an early exploration of lesbianism, bisexuality, cross-dressing, and transgender identities. The novel is pure fun to read, however, and though it raises serious and thoughtful questions about sexuality and the ways that it controls our lives, there is no sense that Woolf wrote the novel specifically to make a public statement or prove a point. Her themes of gender and its relation to social expectations, of imagination and its relation to reality, of the importance of history in our lives, and of the unlimited potential of all humans, regardless of their sex, transcend the specific circumstances under which Woolf may have written the book. A playful and delightful novel, which broke new ground with its publication.

Notes: The author’s photo is from http://www.nndb.com/people/825/000031732/

The photo of Vita Sackville-West, the model for Orlando, may be found on http://users.library.fullerton.edu/scox/vitaswbib.htm

Also reviewed here:  TO THE LIGHTHOUSE

“She could be herself, by herself. And that was what now she often felt the need of—to think;  to be silent; to be alone.”

In what many call her most autobiographical novel, Virginia Woolf creates a warm and intimate  portrait of a family which resembles her own–her parents, brothers and sisters–and the friends with whom they enjoy their summer vacation on the Isle of Skye in the Hebrides.  Mrs. Ramsay, the mother of eight children, is the linchpin of the fictional family.  She adores her husband, and though she often feels she fails him, she persists in smoothing his way so that he can work, managing the house and children, and inviting large groups of his students and friends to visit.  Often strict and always right, Mr. Ramsay loves being the center of praise, but rarely praises others, and is often insensitive to the hopes and dreams of his children.

In Part I, Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay, their children, several women and men (including philosophy students), for whom Mrs. Ramsay enjoys acting as a matchmaker, all contribute their thoughts as Virginia Woolf explores some of her favorite themes during the course of one day on the island.  Mrs. Ramsay’s running commentary on her everyday life emphasizes her vision of the role of women and opens the question of whether or not it is possible for women to find a meaningful role in life outside of marriage.  The importance of the thinking life–with peripheral attention paid also to the artistically creative life–reflects the intellectual climate of England in the lead-up to the First World War, and the desire of many thinkers to create a significant intellectual legacy which will survive them.

Part II, a brief bridge, ten years later, focuses on the changes which have taken place.  The war has begun and ended.  Many key characters have died, and Mr. Ramsay, devastated, also fears that all his writing will have been for naught.  In Part Three, what’s left of the family returns to the house on Skye for a visit after a ten-year absence.  Perhaps showing his personal growth and desire to atone for his previous insensitivity to James’s desires, Mr. Ramsay now insists on making the trip to the lighthouse with teenagers James and his younger sister Cam, though James is no longer even interested in going.   James commands the boat, however, and receives unaccustomed praise.  Back on land, Lily Briscoe, a young woman artist for whom Mrs. Ramsay was hoping to be a matchmaker, decides to begin work again on an unfinished portrait of Mrs. Ramsay, and as she works, she also realizes a new kind of freedom for herself.

Taking a modernist approach, Woolf has no primary narrator, instead slipping in and out of the minds of several characters as they think about life and observe life around them.  Her modified stream-of-consciousness allows her to create a vibrant, free-flowing atmosphere which she peoples with unique characters who have revealed their innermost thoughts.  The overall effect is powerful, and Woolf’s often lyrical prose conveys the sights and sounds of life on the island at the same time that it also enlivens the highly philosophical but very personal portrait of family life.  No unifying plot and no unifying voice tie the three sections of the novel together, and many of the early characters play little role in the ending, yet in her hands the novel “works.”   Woolf captures not only the passage of time but also the effects of time on all of her characters as they continue their lives, however changed, following in the footsteps of experimental writers like James Joyce, and taking literary chances which place her work with the best of the twentieth century.

Notes: The author’s photo appears on http://www.laphamsquarterly.org

The Isle of Sky lighthouse is from http://www.travel-destination-pictures.com

ALSO reviewed here:  ORLANDO

NoteThe Old Gringo (1985) was the first American bestseller written by a Mexican author.

“[The Old Gringo said] that to be stood up against a Mexican stone wall and shot to rags was a pretty good way to depart this life.  He used to smile and say: ‘It beats old age, disease, or falling down the cellar stairs.’

Though this novel has all the hallmarks of a recognized classic, it is, surprisingly, only twenty-five years old, a book first translated into English in 1985.  Carlos Fuentes, the author, brought up by his diplomat parents in the US and throughout Latin America, has always been particularly aware of differences in cultures, and in this novel he elaborates on the differences between the US and Mexico, sensing more than most other writers the inherent, conflicting goals of the two countries.  Through the action, set during Mexico’s civil war in 1914, the author shows Mexico determined to be independent in its own right and true to its own history, while the US wants to create outcomes there which coincide with US goals and political agendas here.   For more than forty years, Fuentes has also been fascinated with the story of American author/journalist Ambrose Bierce, who is believed to have vanished in Mexico during that war, and he exploits this long interest by making Bierce the “Old Gringo” of the title.

Bierce, age seventy-one at the time of his disappearance (sometime in 1914), had traveled the world and had already written most of what he felt he had to say.  He had no existing relationship with anyone in his family, and the one place which drew him at the end of his life was Mexico, where the popular revolution was threatening to change the history of Mexico.  Not incidentally, it was also endangering the large tract of land “owned” by William Randolph Hearst, for whom Bierce had worked as a journalist.  Hearst and the owners of other large haciendas had obtained thousands of acres of land through their connections with the Mexican government, at the expense of the campesinos who had been working the same land for generations.  Committed to the rights of the underdog, Bierce, it is believed, went to Mexico to join up with Pancho Villa and his men, who were fighting the federales and the government of President Victoriano Huerta, known as “the Jackal.”  Bierce never returned, his fate unknown.

Carlos Fuentes

Using this broad outline of what is known about Bierce, Fuentes writes a fascinating novel on many different levels.  On the level of plot, it is a story set in 1914 and told by Harriet Winslow, a thirty-one-year-old American from Washington, D.C., who has accepted the job of teacher to the children of the wealthy Miranda family.  When the Miranda hacienda is overrun by rebels, and her employers leave hastily, Harriet is left without a job and without any prospects.  Conveying an almost mystical sense of destiny, Fuentes uses flashbacks to reveal Harriet’s background and that of the Old Gringo, who has just arrived in the lands around Camargo, Chihuahua.  Harriet regards the seventy-one-year-old Gringo as a father figure, understanding that he has come to Mexico to die, while he in turn, “too brave for his own good,” sees her as the final temptation before his death.  Harriet has had a brief but passionate relationship with Tomas Arroyo, the general who has driven out the Miranda family and hanged many of the federales protecting the property.   She is tormented by that relationship—glad to have had the experience of uninhibited sexual passion but furious with Arroyo “for showing her what she could be and then forbidding her to ever be what she might be.

Ambrose Bierce, by Tom Redman

Fuentes clearly admires the Old Gringo for his sense of honor and moral rectitude, but he also shows him to be human, a man grappling with his future, even as he believes that he has no future.  Like many other characters in the novel, including Harriet Winslow and Tomas Arroyo, who have lost their fathers, the Old Gringo has also lost his family.  The sense of each person’s connection to the past through family permeates the novel, just as people and families are connected to their country through the land.  As the characters separately try to make their own lives worth living, they parallel the goals of the rebels who, as hard-working poor, are determined to remember and protect their own past and their relationship to their country’s history.

The novel’s outcome—the Old Gringo’s death—looms over all the action from the outset, which begins with a grim scene in which his body is being exhumed for shipment back to the US, but the novel is not just a story on one level.  It is also a story illustrating the political differences between Mexico and the US, between a country with a long and complex cultural history and one that is not even two hundred years old, and between the poor and helpless victims of economic and political aggression and their exploitation by wealthy autocrats, some of them American, who benefit from their connections to a corrupt Mexican government.  Tomas Arroyo, the illiterate general, has considered himself honor-bound to protect the legal papers proving the ownership of vast land areas by the poor farmers who have worked it for generations, and he and the other rebels are determined to expel and/or kill those who deny these rights, hoping to topple the government in the process.

Pancho Villa

Fuentes spends much time describing  the characters’ philosophical quandaries (some of them repetitious), but he also includes suggestions of Mexican myths, especially myths related to the sun, moon, and stars.  Nature comes to life here, and symbols abound—the desert being the ultimate image of war, with its tough plants protected by thorns, and its animals, such as scorpions and poisonous snakes possessed of natural weapons.  These images contrast with artificial excesses of church décor and, on a smaller scale, with the Miranda hacienda and its elaborate mirrored ballroom, in which many soldiers see their full images for the first time.  The contrasts between real life and its artificial reflections, between the realities of war and the perhaps unrealistic dreams of its participants, and between remembered history and its loss, add significance and thematic richness to the author’s seemingly simple story.  Ultimately, the differences between the two gringos–Bierce and Harriet Winslow–and the Mexicans they meet at this critical time in history provide the fulcrum upon which Fuentes explores the disconnections between the United States and Mexico.  As Bierce himself says, “To be a gringo in Mexico, that is euthanasia.”

Notes: Fuentes’ photo from www.joschwartz.com.

Photo of Bierce is a painting by Tom Redman on the Ambrose Bierce website, showing Bierce in several phases of his life: http://donswaim.com

Photo of Villa from www.old-picture.com

NOTE:  This debut novel by Andrew Miller was, incredibly, the WINNER of the IMPAC Dublin Award, the most valuable award in the literary world; WINNER of the Italy’s Premio Grinzane Cavour for Best Foreign Novel; and WINNER of the James Tait Black Memorial Award for Fiction when it was first released in 1997.  This review was originally posted on Amazon in July, 2000.
Creatively daring, totally unconventional, and successful!

cover ingenious painWhat a thrill to read a novel by a first time author so skilled and so committed to his subject that he can reject all the conventions and still get his surprising book published–receiving rave reviews on two continents in the process!

Miller sets the book in the eighteenth century and begins with a graphic autopsy of the main character. Here he recreates the philosophical and scientific attitudes of the period, attitudes which are alien to our own, and which he will explore as a subtext throughout the book. He summarizes the life of the main character–which he spends the rest of the book recounting–in the first chapter, eliminating any climactic excitement he might have created. His main character is a man with the inability to feel pain, someone with whom the reader cannot possibly identify, and his adventures are weirdly melodramatic, so unusual the reader’s interest lies primarily in their curiosity.

Author-Andrew-Miller-at-h-007Yet the book “works,” and very often thrills. Somehow he does manage to make the reader care about James Dyer and his fate, and he does create excitement in a plot which skips from small town England to the court of Russia. Miller’s masterful and controlled use of description is a primary factor in his ability to further the action of this unusual story and bring the characters and the period alive.  I  was awestruck by Miller’s creative daring–and by his success.

ALSO by Andrew Miller:  OXYGEN,     PURE,     THE CROSSING

Photo:   The author’s photo is from http://www.dailymail.co.uk

« Newer Posts