Feed on
Posts
Comments

Note: Jane Gardam is WINNER of the Heywood Hill Literary Prize for a lifetime’s contribution to the enjoyment of literature. She is also the only author to have been a two-time WINNER of the Whitbread Award.

“Suppose I had stayed [in rural northeast England]—like my mother. [Imagine] a sort of castaway girl who lived there all her life like Robinson Crusoe. I’d give her a library—her dead grandfather’s vicarage books…I’d give her knowledge of the heart’s affections. And I’d show the power of her childhood landscape, the enfolding murmuring magical marsh so flooded with light sunshine, silvery rain and mist, and the running sea.” – Jane Gardam, Preface, 2011.

In the introduction to this re-publication of Crusoe’s Daughter (1986), author Jane Gardam admits that “This [is] by far the favourite of all my books.”  Brought up in near isolation in the rural north of England, like the main character of this novel, Gardam herself eventually escaped to college in London, but though she joined London’s academic world and had great success as a novelist, she admits “It was the elf-light of childhood that still hung about, the wonder of the marsh…the people still more real to me in the vanished place than most of the people I’ve met since.” Her mother remained in the rural north for her whole life, and Gardam uses her mother’s life as the starting point of this novel, setting it at the turn of the twentieth century on the northeast coast (in or near North Yorkshire and Northumberland, judging from her geographical clues). Though Polly Flint differs in significant ways from her mother, as Gardam explains in the Preface, she admits that when she finished the novel, “I felt I needn’t write any more books. Take it or leave it, Crusoe’s Daughter says everything I have to say.” Fortunately for us, she did write additional highly successful novels, but this one, her favorite, is the most poignant, told with an honesty and affection for her setting that her dryly humorous, more satiric novels lack, however wonderful they are in their own right.

As the novel opens at the beginning of the twentieth century, five-year-old Polly Flint and her father arrive at Oversands, a big yellow house on England’s wild northeast coast, by the river Tyne. Her father, a sailor whose wife died when Polly was an infant, had left her with a series of foster mothers in Wales during her first five years, and his visit with Polly to the home of his wife’s older, unmarried sisters is completely unexpected by those quiet ladies. Shortly after arriving at Oversands, Polly’s father dies, leaving her to be brought up by her Aunts Mary and Frances in a place so isolated that there are virtually no other children. Though she likes her aunts and is particularly fond of her Aunt Frances, she admits that “I would not have known what to do with love if it had been offered.” There is no school she can attend, but she is bright and curious, and she quickly learns to read from her aunts. Through the unpleasant Mrs. Woods, who also lives at Oversands, she also learns French and German. Every day is predictable, however, and the same people come to the house for the same purposes every week.

In her loneliness Polly finds her greatest solace from the books in the library of the house, especially when she discovers Robinson Crusoe, whose twenty-eight-year isolation on an island offers her a way of dealing with her own isolation. Crusoe, an obviously pragmatic man who must deal with each day as it comes, relies on his own ingenuity to solve his problems, just as Polly knows she will have to do. Her first real conflict with the aunts comes when she is twelve, as she firmly rejects being Confirmed in the church, refuses the idea of communion, and criticizes the church’s large wooden crucifix with carved blood dripping from it. Her aunts’ religiosity cannot stand up to Robinson Crusoe’s realism for Polly. “I’m young and I’m empty of life. I just am,” she cries. “I can’t ever forget myself and how I have to be. All the hymn-words spring up and the Collects, Creeds, and Epistles. There doesn’t seem to be anything else.”

Love and death eventually complicate life at Oversands, and in her teens Polly goes to stay with elderly family members, Arthur Thwaite and his sister Celia, who live on the Yorkshire moors, some distance away. Their house, an artists’ retreat, expands her vision of life dramatically, though she is not sure if it is a madhouse, a hospital, or a private asylum. Poets, writers, and musicians, some of them failed, provide a totally different kind of life for Polly, the other extreme from what she has known, leading Polly to tell her Aunt Frances in a letter that “I don’t believe I shall ever fit in anywhere.” A few friendships and one or two romantic crushes give Polly’s life a semblance of normalcy as she matures to her twenties, but as the novel continues to progress up to the 1980s, two world wars, industrialization, and population growth create chaos even in the rural countryside.

Gardam creates real atmosphere here in both time and place, and rural northeast England becomes almost a character of its own, a place filled with wild beauty, harsh weather, and untamed landscapes. The novel’s realism keeps Polly’s story from becoming a romance, however much the reader may empathize with her, and the author’s honest feelings for her characters, many of them based, in part, on her own family members, endow the novel with a poignancy that one does not often find elsewhere in Gardam’s novels. The Robinson Crusoe leitmotif is well integrated, running throughout the novel over the course of more than eighty years, and it firmly connects all aspects of the novel’s long chronology.  A delightful “conversation” between Polly and Crusoe on the nature of fiction, late in the novel, is one of Gardam’s classics. “[Fiction] will have to change,” Polly tells Crusoe. “It’s become quite boring – all about politics or marital discord. The minutiae. You should see the fiction they have thought up about you and Friday.” To which Crusoe replies, “Yes, well, he could be very trying.”  The novel’s final pages, as close to a grand finale as Gardam will probably ever get, will leave a smile on the face of every reader – filled as it is with the dry wit and sense of dramatic irony for which Gardam is so famous, a perfect ending to one of her warmest and most enjoyable novels.

ALSO by Gardam:  GOD ON THE ROCKS, QUEEN OF THE TAMBOURINE,     THE PEOPLE ON PRIVILEGE HILL,      A LONG WAY FROM VERONA     OLD FILTH,      THE MAN WITH THE WOODEN HAT,    LAST FRIENDS,     THE FLIGHTS OF THE MAIDENS

Photos, in order: The author’s photo by Eamonn McCabe appears on http://www.guardian.co.uk

The photo of a yellow house in South Shields, on the Northumberland coast by the river Tyne, is by demonsub and appears on http://www.flickr.com

The untamed moors leading to the ocean are shown on http://www.enjoyengland.com

An old edition of Robinson Crusoe appears on http://imaginactory.com

ARC:  Europa

Note: Published as L’Ogre in France and newly republished in the US by Bitter Lemon Press, this novel was WINNER of the Prix Goncourt in 1973.

“My God, what have I done that You take everything from me?  I’m wrapped up in myself, separated from the others, deprived, guilty, because of Your Law, which I submit to like a humiliated child.  Will the barrier fall?  Will sweetness be given to me, rendered up to me…?”

An author revered as much for the controlled lyricism of his prose as for his uncompromising characterizations, Swiss author Jacques Chessex (1934 – 2009) was the first foreign citizen to win the Prix Goncourt, France’s most prestigious literary award.  In this dramatic novel from 1973, he tells the story of Jean Calmet, a thirty-eight-year-old schoolteacher, whose physician father has just died and with whom he has had a fraught relationship.  The youngest of five children, Jean both loved and feared his father, with good reason, and he is glad that his father has been cremated, rather than buried.  “The doctor would be reduced to ashes.  He could not be allowed any chance of keeping his exasperating, scandalous vigour in the fertile earth,” Jean thinks.  “Make a little heap of ashes of him, ashes at the bottom of an urn.  Like sand. Anonymous, mute dust.”

As the family gathers to choose an urn, Jean meditates on his father’s relationships with the whole family.  His meek mother has lived for fifty years “under the weight of the doctor’s shouts, orders….bent under the tyrant, broken, destroyed.”  His brothers and sisters have gone on to lives of their own and do not return home often, while he, “the Benjamin,” the Biblical youngest and best-loved son, is unmarried and lonely, though no longer living at home.  His job as a teacher provides him with a “refuge from the authority of that father who is bearing down with all his weight on the rest of the world,”  but he has few friends, and though he mentors his students, he is emotionally much like them, still in the thrall of a domineering parent.  He recognizes that “At all costs he must avoid having his father’s urn remain at Les Peuples (at the family home).  It had to be locked up far from here, imprisoned behind a solid iron gate, one that was permanent.”

The Morbier Clock in the dining room is seen as a “tall coffin”

Death soon becomes Jean’s constant companion.  One of his students, Isabelle, is dying of cancer but refuses to give in, insisting on living every minute of her remaining life, sketching, writing poems, and visiting with friends.  By contrast, Jean is obsessing about death, seeing ghosts of his father, and even seeing a porcupine as a symbol of a “wild, happy freedom” which he cannot feel.  He thinks about the fire in the crematorium as a “beautiful purifier,” even as he is dwelling on moments in which his father has yelled at him for being a “cringing, muddleheaded weakling.”   He thinks of the monument to Sire Francois at the Jacquemart Chapel, 1362, one that is covered with snakes and toads.  Thoughts of sex get confused with death, as he remembers seeing his father in a relationship which he should never have seen, and he is unsuccessful in his own relationships.   With no emotional resources to sustain him, even by the age of thirty-eight, he is a completely lost soul, someone ready to become a victim of others, if not himself.

Jacquemart Chapel, 1362, with statue covered with snakes and toads.

When student demonstrations take place at Jean’s school, there is an element of excitement and camaraderie, a shared commitment which gives purpose to the lives of some of his students in ways that Jean himself has never known, and when he takes a group of them on a school trip to Bern, his observations are quite different from theirs. The “Ogre Fountain” and the Bear Pits, regarded as sightseeing destinations for the students, take on ominous symbolic meanings for Jean.  The symbols of a cat, a rat, and a coin add to the heavy sense of his own oppression.

The famed Ogre Fountain in Bern

In an age in which TV, the internet, and social networking are ubiquitous, it is difficult to identify fully with someone who feels as isolated – and, more importantly, as helpless –  as Jean Calmet.  I found myself becoming a bit impatient with this thirty-eight-year-old man who has more in common with his students than with the adult world, and as he becomes more and more obsessed with his own problems and less connected with the outside world (if that is possible, considering his record of inaction), I had a hard time identifying with him in the way that his readers from 1973 must have done.  And when he makes the statement with which I begin this review, “My God, what have I done that You take everything from me?  I’m wrapped up in myself, separated from the others, deprived, guilty, because of Your Law,” it is easy to see that whether he is blaming God or his father, whom he often sees as the same, he is accepting no responsibility for choices he has made on his own.  Though his father is clumsy and crude, he has tried to reach out in his own way to the son he cannot begin to understand, and Jean’s four siblings have managed to escape his father’s complete domination.  One has to wonder how much the author expects us to identify with Jean, who rationalizes that “he had remained in his father’s power, and he had been murdered.”

Bear Pit, Bern, with bears begging for their food, another symbol for Jacques

The glories of nature, lyrically described, add to the depth of this novel, and one would think they would be comforting to Jean, whose aesthetic sensibilities are finely honed.  Unfortunately, any beauty Jean sees seems to vanish as he contemplates death as a destroyer.  His personal neediness overwhelms any sense of perspective that he may have, as his meeting with George Mollendruz shows near the end of the book. When, late in the novel, he sees a dead animal, he observes that “One is not safe being independent in our part of the world. Not safe staying wild and uncompromising in the city,” offering yet another observation about his own inaction (though he himself could hardly be considered “wild and uncompromising”).  Ultimately, I found this novel a fascinating set piece about life in the late 1960s and early 1970s.   Now, forty years after this novel was written, it would be much more difficult to feel as isolated, lonely, and hopeless as Jean Calmet does, and readers now may have more trouble identifying with the main character of this intense psychological novel.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.espaceculturel.ch

One image with which Jean always identifies his father and his home is the Morbier clock, “tall as a coffin,” that dominates the dining room.  From http://duetime.wordpress.com

When Jean has a loss of control, at one point, he imagines the Jacquemart Chapel, 1362, in which the statue of the deceased is covered in snakes and toads.  (That is difficult to see here, but one snake is on the upper arm, and more are on the legs, obvious symbols.)  http://www.lake-geneva-region.ch

The school trip to Bern features a visit to the “Ogre Fountain.”   See   http://www.dicconbewes.com

The Bear Pits of Bern, a tourist attraction, feature bears begging for their food from deep inside their prison.  http://www.gourmantic.comyet another symbol for Jacques’s life.

 

 

Jo Nesbo–PHANTOM

Note: The novels of Jo Nesbo have sold over eleven million copies to date and have won innumerable awards for mystery-writing.

“A murder is a white whale. A missing person is a white whale. If you’ve seen a white whale twice, it’s the same whale.”

In this seventh novel in the Harry Hole series to be translated into English, author Jo Nesbo, with over eleven million thrillers in print, continues to detail Harry’s fight against the symbolic “white whales” of injustice. Here, all Harry’s experience and knowledge as an Oslo policeman are readied for the biggest fight of his life, one to which he willingly makes a complete emotional commitment. Though he has lived in Hong Kong in self-imposed exile for three years, Harry has just learned that Oleg, the son of Rakel, the love of his life, is now jailed on remand in Oslo for the murder of a drug dealer. Harry has always had problems with alcohol, bureaucratic nonsense, and self-control, even during his career with the Oslo Police, and he has battle scars, both visible and invisible, which have made him a cynical man, but he immediately returns to Oslo to review the case, hoping that he can save Oleg, who has always thought of him as “Dad.” Now “clean,” Harry needs to find out more about Oleg’s involvement in this case that he must win.

What follows is the most emotionally involving of all the Harry Hole novels to date, one that readers of the previous novels will want to read but for which I must give a sharp warning: Avoid reading reviews of this novel!   Released in the UK about a year before it was available in the US, the book acquired many spoiler-laden reviews, even by the mainstream press, and a review in one of London’s elite newspapers ruined much of the excitement for me.  Some of these reviews have obviously been written by people who have not read the whole series and do not realize how carefully Nesbo has prepared the reader over time for Harry’s battle with this “white whale,” nor do they understand how readers have slowly built up a reserve of sympathy for Harry, who, despite his personal problems, is motivated by what he knows is right. Readers who have followed the Harry/Rakel/Oleg story from the beginning deserve better from careless reviewers with their spoilers, and those who have not read most of the books to date will want to do so to understand past history before starting this one. Though he continues to provide new visions of life in Oslo here, Nesbo does not give as much background information as many new readers may want or need to appreciate the action surrounding Harry and Oleg, but this is a book that will strike chords with all the diehard Harry Hole fans throughout the world.

Nesbo gets a bit cute (or darkly humorous) with the beginning of the novel, which he tells from the point of view of a rat trying, unsuccessfully, to reach its hungry babies. The reason she cannot reach them is that the body of a wounded young drug addict is blocking her access. The point of view then switches (via change of typeface) to that of the dying young man, Gusto, who is reviewing the circumstances of how he ended up where he is, knowing that he is dying and unable to save himself. Each of the first three parts of the novel begins with the rat and the drug addict, as Nesbo carefully reconstructs the immediate circumstances of his death. Through these sections, the author provides Gusto’s history from Gusto’s own point of view, even as Nesbo is moving backward and forward in time through the other characters in the body of the novel.

Gamblebyen Cemetery, where several scenes take place

(No spoilers.)  Gusto has been friends with Oleg for several years, and both have been associated with a dealer nicknamed “Dubai,” who controls the most addictive new drug ever to have appeared on Oslo’s busy drug scene – “violin,” a synthetic which does not need raw materials from Afghanistan. Dubai is a phantom, a man who stays hidden, unless he is disguised, and he uses surrogates, his own thugs, informers, and corrupt officials to keep his business the most active in Oslo. Only Dubai’s dealers have violin, for which there is the biggest demand in the city, and they distinguish themselves from other drug gangs by wearing Arsenal football shirts, which tip off their customers but not the police. As the demand for violin increases with the instantaneous addictions of all users who ingest this drug, the success of the other gangs fades by attrition, either through violent attacks or arrests. Dubai is in the catbird seat, and when the supply of violin begins to dry up due to a shortage of materials relative to demand, some, including Harry, begin to wonder whether Dubai and his street dealers are being protected by police and politicians.

Vigeland Park monolith, to which Harry runs during a crucial moment.

A complex novel to track as all the relationships among the characters unfold, Phantom provides enough action to keep even the jaded reader actively engaged, with threads related to how airplane pilots can actively participate in the spread of drugs internationally, how dealers exploit their victims, how the drug lords reinforce their power, how police and politicians become corrupted, and the extremes to which drug addicts will go to obtain even one more fix of violin. Harry, as he investigates, is a constantly moving target for the bigshots who have everything to lose if Harry wins, and he treads as carefully as someone like Harry can, always remembering that a misstep can endanger both Oleg and Rakel. Occasionally, the details of the various thread lines become a bit fuzzy and some local slang (not familiar in the US) can occasionally be mystifying, but Nesbo is careful to bring every plot line together in the conclusion. Parts of the story become absurd, even bleakly funny, in retrospect, but Nesbo’s pacing will keep most readers from questioning what is happening – Harry being saved, at one point, by an empty Jim Beam bottle is a classically ironic event, as is his break into an old woman’s house in the middle of a gunfight. Ultimately, Nesbo brings this novel to its conclusion in grand, emotional, and cinematic fashion. Readers who have read the previous Harry Hole novels will not want to miss this one, preferably before the spoilers begin to get more publicity than the novel itself.

Also by Nesbo (in order):   THE REDBREAST,   NEMESIS,    THE DEVIL’S STAR,      THE REDEEMER,     THE SNOWMAN,     THE LEOPARD,     THE BAT,      POLICE,     COCKROACHES (1998),      THE SON (2014),        BLOOD ON SNOW (2015),     MIDNIGHT SUN (2016),     THE THIRST (2017),     KNIFE (2019)

Photos, in order: The author’s photo is from http://www.extendedworldtravel.com

The Arsenal football shirt is depicted here: http://store.nike.com

Several scenes take place at the Gamblebyen Cemetery: http://flickrhivemind.net

The famed Monolith in Vigeland Park, a place Harry runs to, is from this website:  http://www.douglas.stebila.ca

PHANTOM
REVIEW. Mystery, Thriller, Noir, Nordic Noir, Norway, Social and Political Issues
Written by: Jo Nesbo
Published by: Vintage; Reprint edition (April 23, 2013)
Date Published: 04/23/2013
Edition: Harry Hole series, reprint edition
ISBN: 978-0307951151
Available in: Ebook Paperback Hardcover

Daniel Sada–ALMOST NEVER

Note: Daniel Sada was WINNER of Mexico’s National Prize for Arts and Sciences (for Literature) in 2011.* This novel was WINNER of Mexico’s prestigious Herralde Prize in 2008.

“Renata and Mireya: heaven and hell, sanctity and sin, eternal and circumstantial, ruthless struggle and mere toy, but only one really deep intersection, an arid depth, and therein the absurd.”

Much admired by both Roberto Bolano, who said, “Of my generation I most admire Daniel Sada,” and by Carlos Fuentes, who said that Daniel Sada “will be a revelation for world literature,” Mexican author Daniel Sada has now been published in English for the first time by Graywolf Press. Almost Never, “a Rabelaisian tale of lust and longing,” provides a bawdy and mildly satiric look at the whole concept of machismo as it exists in the mid-1940s in Mexico. Sada’s main character, Demetrio Sordo, almost thirty when the novel opens in 1945, grew up in rural Parras in northern Mexico, but he has recently been living near Oaxaca in southern Mexico, working six or seven days a week as an agronomist in charge of a large ranch. Bored by the usual nightly “entertainments” of “dominoes in seedy dives,” dull strolls for a mile or two followed by a cup of coffee, he finally concludes that “sex was the most obvious option.” Taking a taxi to a local brothel, he meets the beautiful brunette Mireya, revealing his personal charm by introducing himself with “Hey, you, come on already, let’s go to bed.”

Demetrio’s increasingly adventuresome relationship with Mireya, explicitly described, becomes more and more obsessive as he hastens to visit her as often as possible over the next few weeks. The visits come to a temporary stop, however, when he receives a letter from his mother in Parras, asking him to come home at Christmas to accompany her to a wedding in Sacramento, even farther away to the north. As Demetrio’s trip will be over eight hundred miles through rural countryside, he will need to spend three days traveling there and three days back, with only one day at the wedding itself. Demetrio has no car or truck, and there are few paved roads. At the wedding in Sacramento, however, he meets and falls instantly in love with the beautiful, virginal Renata Malgarejo, so closely tied to the local culture of virginity that when he uses the pronoun “tu,” in telling her he will write to her from Oaxaca, she is shocked by his “familiarity.” She may allow the use of “tu” next time he visits, she says—on his vacation in August, nine months from then. He may even be allowed to hold her hand.

Upon his return to the Oaxaca area, Demetrio and Mireya resume their relationship, but eventually she demands, “Get me out of this hellhole. I’m sick of being a slave to pleasure. I want to give myself to you, be faithful to you, have a family…I love you.” Demetrio, however, temporizes, saying that he is saving his money for a down payment on a house, that “I’m thinking about buying a palace. You deserve nothing less….” Faced with one woman who will do literally anything for him and who wants to get married right away, and another woman whom he has never even kissed and who plays the ultimate “hard-to-get” role, Demetrio faces a rare set of challenges, determined to get what he wants from both.

In a slangy and breezy tone, the author develops his plot with more and more complications, clearly having fun with his audience at Demetrio’s expense and showing him to be both boorish and selfish, manipulating everyone around him—all of his victims women. At the same time, the author clearly understands Demetrio and is never harsh in his judgment of him. Demetrio is as much a product of his time as Renata and Mireya are, and as the novel’s chronology progresses from 1945 through 1947, with the country’s increasing industrialization, the migration of the rural population to the cities, new opportunities for young men to make money in new kinds of jobs, and improvements in transportation, Demetrio becomes emblematic of a whole generation of young men for whom the sky seems to be the limit. The biggest danger, of course, is that these young men, including Demetrio, are actually inexperienced and naïve to the ways of the outside world, potential victims of other men who are more clever, more powerful, or more worldly, just as the women are victims of the men who have been dominating them socially and sexually for generations.

Sada is a master of language, and though his characters are, of necessity, somewhat caricatured as he pokes fun at them, they are lively and full of personal quirks. Peripheral characters, like Dona Telma, Demetrio’s mother, and Dona Zulema, his aunt (“the treacle tornado”), have stories which give depth to the author’s revelations about life and love, and Renata’s relationship with her domineering mother is an absolute classic. Demetrio’s dreams reveal that he does have a conscience, even when he commits boorish acts to extricate himself from complications he has never expected. His courtship of Renata, an exercise in frustration, has moments of high humor, and his agony at the slow pace of the relationship is matched, at times, by the reader’s own impatience. When Demetrio finally, in rebellion, begins to think of the whore Mireya as an “awesome saint…sexual saint, embossed upon the always-changing great beyond” and refers to her as “most holy Mireya,” the reader understands his state of mind.

The story with all its complications and bawdy language mocks the pretensions of its characters at the same time that it explains and even, in some cases, tries to justify them in terms of the social context of the period. The action is often absurd and the characters’ behavior outrageous. The language and sexual imagery are crude, and some readers will find them at least as vulgar as Demetrio is, something the author, no doubt, intended. Translator Katherine Silver deserves much credit for translating this novel and maintaining its tone, with a only few minor missteps (a character told to “suck it up,” someone referred to as “screwed up”), which seemed jarring for a novel set in the mid-1940s. Daniel Sada, whose novels have been, until now, unknown to the English-speaking world, should become a major “new” Mexican author, receiving the praise he deserves here for works of which we have been ignorant until now.

*Author Daniel Sada died on Nov. 18, 2011, at age 58 after a long illness, just hours after the Government of Mexico granted him the National Prize of Sciences and Arts 2011 (for Literature).

ALSO by Sada:  ONE OUT OF TWO

Photos, in order: The author’s photo is from http://www.tuteve.tv

Parras  appears on this map (with Sacramento to the north) from http://inexplicata.blogspot.com

The church in Sacramento, which Renata attends, appears on http://www.tourbymexico.com

The Mexican pool hall depicted here is probably similar to the one that Demetrio eventually builds:  http://www.justwalkedby.com

“On Wednesday 23rd March 1983 there appeared in the Guardian the following report:
‘An inquest is to be held on the two elderly women whose bodies were found on Monday in the dilapidated North London house they shared with a man who was the brother of one of them and the brother-in-law of the other. Postmortem examinations yesterday revealed that they had both died from natural causes – but that the older woman had been dead for up to a year.’ ”

No one incorporates black, ironic humor into novels about earnest, often batty, elderly people better than the British. Gerard Woodward in A Curious Earth; Jane Gardam, especially in Queen of the Tambourine; Barbara Pym in Quartet in Autumn; and Stephen Benatar in Wish Her Safe at Home all provide ironic and twisted pictures of end of life issues as they affect the main characters and those around them. Benatar pays special attention to characters who are dealing with significant emotional stresses, and his novels are filled with psychological insights and feelings the reader understands, even as his mordant wit draws the characters to the edge, allowing the reader to watch them cross the line into darker and darker worlds of their own.

Sometimes described as “the best British writer that no one has ever heard of,” Benatar, now in his mid-seventies, has his own unusual story. Published by several noted publishing houses in England during the 1980s, Benatar quickly discovered that even though he won awards and his books were nominated for prizes, that his publishers did not promote or sell his books – that if his books were to sell, he had to do it himself. He ended his relationship with mainstream publishers, formed his own company to publish his books, and has been hand selling them, primarily at Waterstone’s in London, on weekends for thirty years since. The New York Review of Books recently republished his 1981 novel, Wish Her Safe at Home, after Edwin Franks, the NYRB managing editor, accidentally ran into the author when the author was returning some unused wine after a book launch and engaged him in conversation. Now When I Was Otherwise, Benatar’s third novel, written in 1983, has also been republished in England this past spring by Capuchin Classics. With a first paragraph as dramatic and ironic as the one quoted above, it is easy to see why Benatar succeeds in selling fifty to a hundred books each weekend.

The three people mentioned in the opening paragraph, including the two dead women, are Dan Stormont, a seventy-six-year-old widower, whose German wife Erika has passed away long ago; his sister Marsha Poynton, age sixty, a divorcee with two sons who live far away; and Daisy Stormont, their sister-in-law, around whom all the action turns, the widow of Henry Stormont, Dan’s brother. Daisy, an active and lively flirt with great appeal to men, at least in her early days, has kept her age secret for her entire life, and most women are convinced that she is at least fifteen years older than she says she is, which would put her in her eighties at the time of her death. In fact, it was her age which made Henry’s mother Florence object to Daisy’s marriage to the naive Henry when he was in his early twenties, since Florence assumed Daisy to be in her late thirties then. Daisy herself claimed to be only two years older than Henry, and she blames Florence’s attitudes for forever tainting Daisy’s relationship with the family.

The novel starts at the end and works its way back to the beginning, jumping back and forth among time frames as the backgrounds and the entire histories of each character are laid bare. Often information about one character is conveyed by another, usually Daisy, from her own point of view, and Benatar is absolutely brilliant at writing dialogue which reveals character, attitudes, and information simultaneously. Daisy has a knack for saying exactly the wrong thing at the wrong time, while seeming to be ingenuous and innocent, and the reader quickly believes that no one could be so insensitive by accident. In short order Daisy alienates everyone, works her wiles on more than one man at a time, turns characters against each other, and causes some to question their own sanity, a problem that only increases when she moves in with Dan and Marsha in their somewhat run-down, “three bedroom, semi-detached” house in Hendon, outside of London.

If Hitchcock were to make a film, Bette Davis would have been a shoo-in to play Daisy, though Daisy shares so many characteristics with Scarlett O’Hara that Vivian Leigh would have been a contender, too. At one point, Daisy wonders aloud if the marriage of Marsha and Andrew will last, and when challenged by Dan’s wife Erika, she says, “ ‘He strikes me as having something more between the eyes than she has; and I’ve often thought that it must be pure hell for a man with any sort of spark in him to be chained to an uninteresting woman. Beauty isn’t everything, you know. Although I daresay it helps,’ she added, looking at Erica reflectively.”

Appalled, the unflappable Erika responds, “Can this be a record? You have insulted me; you have insulted your mother-in-law; you have insulted your sister-in-law. I don’t know whether you’ve insulted Dan – but what is worse – far, far worse – you have actually managed to belittle him in front of me. I would have thought that was impossible. I believe that I should offer my congratulations.”

Page after page of similar dialogue initiated by Daisy reveals Marsha’s marriage and divorce and her later relationships with her sons; Dan’s marriage to Erika; and Daisy’s own marriage, widowhood, and flirtations. The roles each takes within the threesome at the house, the resentments caused by Daisy and exploited by her, and the deliberate hurts she causes in order to get her own way are examined leading up to the demise of the two women. Because everyone will be able to imagine someone acting like Daisy, the book feels true to life, no matter how bizarre Daisy becomes. Always there is a casual wittiness to the scenes which keeps the reader simultaneously amused and horrified by her behavior. Those who enjoy offbeat and darkly humorous novels will find this one a classic, the ending especially memorable.

ALSO by Benatar:  WISH HER SAFE AT HOME

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.firsteditionpress.co.uk

Dan, Marsha, and Daisy might have lived in a “3 BR semi-detached” house similar to this one in Hendon.  http://www.findaproperty.com

In one scene of marvelous double irony, Dan compares Daisy to Florence Nightingale in The White Angel.  She is outraged:  “I take it as very little compliment to be compared to a liar, a bully, a hypocrite, a busybody, an egoist, a betrayer….”  Benatar’s genius for character and dark humor never end.  The poster is from http://en.wikipedia.org

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »