Feed on
Posts
Comments

Note: This novel is WINNER of the Costa Award for First Novel for 2011.

“We are sick of the failed promises. Sick of sickness. Sick of our environment filled with pollution and our rivers filled with oil spills. Sick of guns. Sick of no electricity. Sick of our government putting billions of pounds in their own pockets. We are sick of the oil companies giving these men money, knowing it will not go to the people.”

Twelve-year-old Blessing and her fourteen-year-old brother Ezekiel find their comfortable lives in suburban Lagos dramatically changed when their parents suddenly separate and they must follow their mother to her native village, a tiny community near Warri in the Niger Delta. There they find life completely different—no electricity, no generator, no air conditioning, no refrigerator, no running water or flush toilets, no separate bedrooms, and a school system that uses harsh corporal punishment for the most minor of infractions. Living in a small house with their grandparents, while their mother takes the only job she can get at a bar at the nearby oil company compound, Blessing and Ezekiel quickly learn what it is like having almost no money while living in an area with some of the richest oil deposits in the world. The profits from this incredible resource are unavailable to ordinary Nigerians who live on top of these deposits, yet it is these local residents who must cope with the fatal pollution of the Niger Delta–the largest wetland area in the world.

A close-up view of the lives of an Ijaw family in a small village, which peacefully supports both Christian and Muslim religions, the novel is more personal and descriptive than it is plot-based. Very little actually “happens” during the first hundred pages, as author Christie Watson, who lived in Nigeria for several years, creates a family which is remarkably real, living a life which rings true in the smallest of details. Ezekiel becomes very close to his grandfather, a Muslim preacher (newly converted from Christianity) who has created an outdoor mosque behind their house, and they are observant (except for Grandfather’s alcohol consumption). The children’s grandmother and mother both turn over their earnings to the grandfather, who is always on the verge of “getting a job as a petroleum engineer” at the oil company, though never succeeding, spending his time at The Executive Club instead, drinking brandy and talking about all his big plans. When they repeatedly run out of money for the barest necessities and Blessing and Ezekiel have to drop out of school, they wonder where the money comes from that grandfather Alhaji uses to buy brandy. The fact that all the women in the family have full-time jobs, none of them high-paying, while Alhaji apparently does not work at all, makes the issues that much more emotional. The women who are employed are already trying to support themselves and the family, plus a chauffeur, his four wives, and his seventeen children, all of whom live with them.

Blessing, who never is able to return to school after her initial experience there, becomes her grandmother’s assistant, delivering babies—and she and Grandmother, both together and separately, handle even the most complex obstetrical emergencies with confidence—and no anesthetics. This work allows the author to integrate an important subplot about the mutilation of young girls, often when they are infants, a problem which affects to up to eighty percent of the girls in very rural, very closed tribal communities. (The percentage in the larger, more open communities has been dropping steadily but is still an issue.) These young girls, who may be only thirteen or fourteen when they have their first babies, have a very high rate of complications as a result of their mutilations, with deaths to the mothers and babies not uncommon. Blessing is horrified by this discovery.

As Ezekiel, an asthmatic who also has peanut allergies, becomes thinner and thinner, unable to eat meat, which is always fried in peanut oil to counteract the spoilage due to lack of refrigeration, the characters in the family become more and more sympathetic. Olive oil or vegetable oil is extremely expensive, and their mother, on probation in her new job, has no way to “borrow” it from the bar. Blessing saves her vegetables for him so he won’t starve. The air pollution makes Ezekiel’s breathing problems even worse. These are exacerbated further by Alhaji who believes that Marmite is a cure-all, even when Ezekiel has run out of emergency injections for his allergic reactions and inhalers for his asthma. Timi, the mother, is helpless to change this.

As the lives of the Kentabe family unfold, the reader observes how they try to cope with rivers so polluted they cannot use the water, air that no one should have to breathe, trees and crops that will no longer grow in the soil, jobs that are given to foreigners and those with close ties to the government, poverty due to corruption of government officials, and the greed of the oil companies, most of them run by Americans. This pollution of the land, rivers, and air has continued unabated for over fifty years. As it continues to get worse, we see here, young Nigerians are organizing to seize “their heritage”–the oil under their land. Violence has become endemic. Blessing and Ezekiel are warned not to go near the river when the Sibeye Boys (young thugs), with their guns, are out on patrol, or beyond certain areas of the forest, where heavily armed rebels may be hanging out, planning attacks on pipelines and on those who work for oil companies. Explosions, deaths, and kidnappings for ransom have become common.

Though the novel starts slowly, with its emphasis on developing character and setting, it becomes, eventually, a series of interconnected episodes which illustrate the problems of the country, as Blessing, Ezekiel, and their mother Timi try to find happiness in their new life. When Timi, the mother, finds a new suitor, Ezekiel becomes an angry teenager and acts out in ways that no one has ever seen before, precipitating a crisis.

The author’s style is simple, straightforward, and easy to digest, with much of the action being conveyed through dialogue. The author gives the reader everything s/he needs in order to imagine what is happening, rather than requiring a reader to “stretch” or fill in blanks. While this may sacrifice suspense and make the novel unusually episodic, the totally engaging characters are well drawn and keep the interest high. A book that deserves its place on CNN’s list of “Twelve Novels to Keep You Entertained All Summer.”

Photos, in order: The author’s photo is from http://www.otherpress.com

Like Blessing and her family, two boys are drawing water from the polluted river:

Armed young men, some still boys, in a gunboat along the river:   http://www.thedailymaverick.co.za

An oil fire threatens a small village nearby:  http://sherpas2.blogs.sapo.pt

The Tiny Sunbird, similar to a hummingbird, was photographed by Nik Borrow:   http://www.birdquest-tours.com

“If the revolution is over, and in a sense it is, it’s because the dead of Africa, their mouths full of earth, cannot protest…and we, the survivors, are still so doubtful of our own existence that, given our inability to move, we fear that our gestures lack flesh and our words sound, that we are as dead as they are.”

In this high-temperature fever dream of a novel, written originally in 1979 and newly translated, the images often seize and explode with powerful emotion.  Author Antonio Lobo Antunes describes the life of a newly graduated Lisbon physician who has been sent to Angola from 1971 – 1973, during Portugal’s war to preserve its colonies, along with its traumatic aftermath.  As the novel begins, six years have passed since the speaker has returned to Lisbon from Angola, but the young physician still cannot come to grips with all he saw and felt there. Furious by the betrayal of the Portuguese government, consisting of the ultra-right wing Estado Novo led for many years by Antonio de Oliveira Salazar (or “the Castrato, as the speaker calls him), the speaker accuses that government of responsibility for all the Angolan and Portuguese dead and for the living, but lost, souls who had to fight a war which they, as soldiers on the ground, could see made no sense at all. At one point he explodes in rage: “Standing at the door of the operating room, with the barracks dogs sniffing at my clothes, greedy for the blood of my wounded comrades,” he cries, “I hated the people who were lying to us and oppressing us and humiliating and killing us in Angola, [those] serious, dignified gentlemen in Lisbon stabbing those of us in Angola in the back, the politicians, magistrates, policemen, informers, and bishops…”

After bedding a woman he has just met, he is suddenly impelled to tell her about his experiences in Angola, and, once started, he cannot stop. “I am a tender soul,” he says, “very tender, even before I’ve had my sixth neat Jim Beam or my eighth Drambuie.” As his life in Angola unfolds in this long monologue, he is constantly aware of how much he has changed and how much he has lost. “Perhaps,” he says, “the war has helped to make me the person I am today whom I deep down reject: a melancholic bachelor whom no one phones and from whom no one expects a call, who coughs occasionally just to feel as if he has company.”

The intensity of the feelings and images throughout this book belie the usual objectivity of a novelist. Like his speaker, the author, too, was a young physician when he was sent to perform military service in Angola from 1971 – 1973, and though this is considered a novel, it is obviously extremely autobiographical. At one point the speaker even calls the lover to whom he is telling his story, six years later, “Maria Jose,” the name of the author’s former wife, by whom he had two daughters.

The rich, thick descriptions of the countryside and its activity are so life-like that the reader sometimes feels like squinting—images almost too intense to process. In one fairly typical paragraph, in which he describes his arrival in Luanda, the speaker notes that “the water resembled murky sun lotion smeared onto old, grubby skin veined with rotting cables.” Thick with vegetation and insects, the harbor also features “whores, worn out by heartless men from Lisbon…like dying whales stranded on a final beach.” The paragraph continues: Black men sitting along the pier are “watching with timeless absorption, simultaneously acute and blind, [as] you see in photographs showing the closed, inward-turned eyes of John Coltrane as he played his bittersweet, drunken-angel music on the saxophone.” And, he concludes, “I’ve always been in favor of erecting in some suitable square in Portugal a monument to spit, a spitting bust, a spitting marshal…a spitting equestrian statue…something that would provide, in the future, a perfect definition of the perfect Portuguese male; someone who spits and boasts about his sexual prowess.”

The speaker’s personal, emotional reactions are even more vivid. Receiving the news that his wife has given birth to a daughter, he cynically imagines that back in Lisbon, “the patriots of the National Union Party are thinking of us as they buy black, see-through underwear for their secretaries …businessmen are thinking of us as they manufacture modestly priced armaments, the Government is thinking of us as it awards miserable little pensions to the widows of soldiers, and we, wretched ingrates, the target of so much love, either leave our barbed-wire compounds to be killed, out of sheer perversity, by a mine or in an ambush or we negligently leave behind us fatherless children who will be taught to point at our photo next to the television, in family rooms we have never known…”

Then, in an anguished cry, he asks, “What have they done to my people, what have they done to us, sitting here waiting in this landlocked place, imprisoned by three rows of barbed wire in a land that doesn’t belong to us, dying of malaria and bullets…fighting an invisible enemy, fighting the endless days that never pass..fighting the dark nights as thick and opaque as a mourning veil that I draw over my head in order to sleep, just as when I was a child, I used the edge of my sheet to protect myself from the phosphorous blue eyes of my ghosts.”

The novel contains remarkably little battle action, stressing instead the effects of war and setting on one sensitive young physician who is still traumatized six years after he has returned home. The density of these descriptions becomes so overwhelming, at times, that the reader becomes almost immune to them—and that is the supremely ironic parallel to the speaker’s discoveries on his return. The reader becomes the equivalent of the speaker’s friends, family, and countrymen who simply cannot process all that the speaker has to say or the misery that so affects his life.  A mere six years after his return, he sees that for everyone around him, “Everything is real apart from the war, which never existed: there were never any colonies, no Fascism, no Salazar, no Tarrafal prison camp…the calendars of this country stopped moving so long ago that we’ve forgotten all about them…”

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on  http://www.tintafresca.net

The map of Angola is from http://www.swimmikeswim.com

The army uniform of Portugal during the war in Angola is seen on  http://www.scribd.com

The photo of Antonio Oliveira Salazar, who founded and led Estado Novo for many years, is found here:  http://guinevereuniversidade.blogspot.com


“I still don’t know what made me climb the stairs to Alice Singer’s 57th Street gallery.  It was June 1997, New York City…I was hot and tired and I wandered past dozens of unremarkable drawings and sketches…before I was held and shocked by something I had never expected to see.  It was a drawing, 12” x 8”, in ink, mixed media and collage: Bridge no. 122.  I did not need a printed label beside it to know it was by Nat Tate.”

In this newly reprinted book from 1998, William Boyd details the life and work of Nat Tate, an artist whose work became highly sought-after in the 1950s.  One of the Abstract Expressionists in New York City during that decade, he could usually be found at his studio in the heart of the art district, at galleries, in conversation with Gore Vidal, Frank O’Hara or Peggy Guggenheim, or drinking with Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning, and others at the Cedar Tavern on University Place.  He traveled to Europe in 1959 and visited Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, who became his idol.  Every one of his paintings sold almost immediately, most of them before the scheduled gallery openings even took place.  His most famous work consisted of over two hundred pen-and-ink drawings of the Brooklyn Bridge, in honor of his favorite poet Hart Crane’s “The Bridge” cycle, and he had started a new series, also honoring Crane, called “White Buildings.”

Then, unexpectedly, in January, 1960, at age thirty-one, he gathered together as many of his works as he could find and burned them.  At noon, four days later, he had a pleasant cup of coffee with Frank O’Hara and Todd Heuber.  At five o’clock that afternoon, midway between the Statue of Liberty and the Jersey shore, he jumped off the back of the Staten Island Ferry and committed suicide.  Hart Crane, too, had jumped off a ship in the Gulf of Mexico at age thirty-four.  Neither body was ever found.

“The Portrait of K”

This small book memorializing Nat Tate is William Boyd’s homage to this forgotten artist. Looking very much like a fine art monograph about Nat Tate, the book boasts thick semi-gloss paper, wide margins, understated design, a great deal of white space, and many photographs of Nat Tate from childhood to his death, and his friends, family, and associates.  At a party to celebrate the publication of this memorial to Tate on April 1, 1998, several hundred artists, dealers, writers, and the glitterati of the New York art world gathered to hear publisher David Bowie read passages from the book.  Another party was scheduled for the book’s London release a week later.

Then word leaked out:  Nat Tate never existed.  The book was a fiction created by Boyd, David Bowie, Gore Vidal, Picasso’s biographer John Richardson, and David Lister, a journalist from the Independent in London.  Lister could not wait to post his scoop, jumped the gun, and the whole plan unraveled.

“Bridge No. 122”

As Boyd explains in an article he wrote for Harper’s Bazaar in April, 2011,  “It wasn’t planned this way. Nat Tate was created out of a desire to experiment–to see if something entirely fictitious could experience a life in the world as something wholly credible, real, and true. I wanted to launch the book out into the public arena and see what would happen, to see who bought the story wholesale and who was suspicious. I wondered how long it would take for us to be rumbled. A month? Six months? A year or so?”

At the time, he explains, “I was on the editorial board of an art magazine called Modern Painters, as was David Bowie, which is how we met. With the editor’s cooperation, I came up with the idea of creating an imaginary painter. However, his life would be tricked out with absolute authenticity: photographs, reminiscences, examples of surviving artwork.”   They didn’t, apparently, figure on the importance of a journalist’s need for a scoop, and the plan fizzled.

Detail of the portrait of Frank O’Hara by Alice Neel

Since the original publication in 1998, Boyd says, “The phenomenon has never stopped. There have been three TV documentaries about Tate. The biography has been translated into French and German and will be republished in the U.K. and the U.S. this month (May, 2011). In the 2010 TV dramatization of my novel Any Human Heart, Tate is played by the actor Theo Cross. And, even more bizarrely, the first authenticated Tate drawing to go on the open market is about to be auctioned in London.”  Since Boyd himself always wanted to be an artist and has a collection of his own work in his own house, we can only hope that he feels happy with the Nat Tate work that will be sold.

Boyd says now that he “feel(s) a bit like a Dr. Frankenstein confronting his benign monster–not fearful but baffled, amused, and full of affection. Tate seems to have taken on a life of his own that has less and less to do with me. And once an artwork by this wholly fictional painter is bought for hard cash at auction, I suppose further that the whole hoax will have come full circle. Fiction and reality will have melded inexorably. Tate doesn’t need me anymore; he’s on his own. Nat lives!”

“Unnumbered Bridge,”

This is a fascinating turn of events, and I confess that as I was reading this book, knowing in advance that Nat Tate never existed, I really found myself wishing he had existed.  I wanted him to be a posthumous success.  I could think of many wonderful artists, people I know and love, whose work is every bit as good as that of much more famous artists, but who never made the publicity connection, or the connection to the right New York gallery, or who were not able to “play the game” to be famous and successful.  It is for those people that I wanted Nat Tate to be remembered.  Perhaps he will take on a new life.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo by Andrew Crowley is from http://www.telegraph.co.uk

The Portrait of K,” by Nat Tate, along with a great article by William Boyd about how he came to write this book appears here:  http://www.harpersbazaar.com

Bridge No. 122″ by Nat Tate is also from http://www.harpersbazaar.com

The detail of the portrait of Frank O’Hara by Alice Neel, in the National Portrait Gallery, appears on:  http://www.english.illinois.edu

“Unnumbered Bridge,” by Nat Tate is from http://www.harpersbazaar.com I have found this drawing haunting.  If you squint at the bottom center of the picture (to the left of the white sticker), you will see a man’s face.  The artist might have used this photo of Tate from the cover of the book as his inspiration.

ALSO by Boyd, reviewed here:    WAITING FOR SUNRISE,     ANY HUMAN HEART,        SWEET CARESS,        LOVE IS BLIND ,      TRIO      Also, RESTLESS (Amazon review)

“I wasn’t a complete sucker, [and Joe] didn’t scare me…He would never be able to tarnish my reputation, my standing in the business world…even if he were a lawyer.  And so what if he believed he knew what I’d done, once, twice, a few times before—the pathetic accusations…But he wouldn’t catch me, nobody would.”

Described on Amazon and elsewhere as a satire and as “the first credit crunch novel,” something that, frankly, would never have lured me into reading it, Get Me Out of Here is much more like an adult version of Patrick McCabe’s novel of psychological horror, The Butcher Boy, than it is a broad picture of the London business community at large.  The book focuses almost exclusively on Matt Freeman, a thirty-three year-old Londoner who is trying to run his financial business.  An overly-driven yuppie with all the stereotypical hang-ups about appearances, brand names, personal connections, and the toys of success, Matt, a first person narrator, conveys every thought that enters his mind, every twisted bit of false logic, every sensation, every hope for the future, and every self-deluded justification for the crimes he commits—and he commits a lot of them.  We know his personal friends, all his lovers, and his neighborhood–he is individualized, not the generic stick figure one usually sees in satires. The focus here is on the small, not the broad and universal – the life of one young man whose problems are so extreme that he cannot be considered “typical,” even among psychopaths.

Though Matt is an emotional mess, his problems started well before the country’s current economic problems and its “credit crunch,” and we never know exactly when or why.  He is single, having had several intense relationships, one of which, with Fran, almost led to the altar, but he is totally ego-driven, unable to share or participate in any relationship as an adult.  As his current girlfriend says at the beginning of the novel, “With you it’s always me, me, me.  ‘Oh, I’m so busy, you wouldn’t understand.  Poor me.  It’s not my fault but his fault of her fault or the weather’s fault’…You’re nothing but a leech.”  With brilliant irony and mordant wit, which becomes ever more obvious as the novel progresses, Matt announces to the reader that “I wasn’t going to inform her that, actually, leeches had numerous beneficial uses, especially when it came to bloodletting.”

Within the first forty pages, Matt Freeman has already committed a murder.  But “it’s not his fault.”  It’s the victim’s own fault.  She wouldn’t have ended up dead at all, he tells us, if it hadn’t been for the “cheap, man-made material” in the neck of the shirt she was wearing.  “Another branded ripoff.  She should have stuck to John Smedley [designer knitwear], like me.”  Addicted to recognizable labels, Matt believes that they are essential to maintaining the appearance of success in London’s financial world.  We never find out much about what he did, exactly, before he started his own business, nor do we know, even, whether this business is, or ever was, real, but he tells friends that he is working on a big business deal with North Korea, talks about all his travels all over the world, and indicates that he is also working on deals with Iran and Kuwait.  He frets, fusses, and fumes his way through his life, sharing every piece of trivia.  Slowly, the reader realizes that he is also having some financial problems, though typically, he never admits this.

Author Henry Sutton is clearly having fun as he creates this character and then lets him wreak havoc on those around him.  Matt Freeman (the name, alone, is ironic) is so wild and, literally, crazy, that readers will be reading about his actions with horror at the same time that they are chuckling because he is so twisted.  His ego is so sensitive, and his need to be important is so great, that he misreads even ordinary comments, taking everything as a personal insult, and, unfortunately, often feeling the need for serious redress.  As Matt’s already limited hold on reality crumbles further, he becomes ever more imaginative in finding ways to stay ahead of the pack (including the police).  The body count rises and keeps rising, as does the reader’s involvement and appreciation of the author’s cleverness.

In addition to creating a compelling character in Matt Freeman, Sutton also includes unique descriptions of such arcane subjects as Matt’s personal “television free zone,” the smells of Kentucky Fried Chicken vs. Burger King when eaten by passengers on the Tube (“KFC was a notch or two above Burger King when it came to pungency.”), and the dental hygiene of the North Koreans.  (“For some reason I couldn’t imagine the North Koreans flossing their teeth with any regularity or passion.”)  He often tells the story obliquely, creating “ah-ha” moments for the reader who has suddenly figured out what has happened by reading into Matt’s comments and realizing what he does NOT say.  And he also tantalizes the reader by leaving much unresolved at the end.  After all, Matt, the narrator, does not know what will happen, either.

Sutton does, occasionally, draw parallels to world-wide economic situations during the novel, but Matt Freeman is so out of touch with the reality of his own actions that it is difficult to see any way in which these domestic or international crises affect him directly.  In one wonderful parallel, full of irony, Matt muses, “Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, North Korea, all still out of control in their various ways, and with no one from the so-called international community able to do very much, despite all the…good intentions…No one ever acts in time, or with enough intelligence. Or force.”  He does make reference, occasionally, to current financial conditions, but as he has blamed everything and everyone imaginable for his problems, these accusations become paranoid “throwaways.”   As the novel draws to a close and his problems reach their peak, Matt has a sudden “insight.”   “My time was coming,” he says, “Oh yes.  Finally I’d be able to realize my full potential, unchecked, unhampered by outdated institutions and shallow convictions….[because] I was..the one with the imagination, the vision, the energy.”

Photos related to the action: The author’s photo is from  http://blogs.mirror.co.uk

Matt Freeman’s prized possession is a vintage 1952  Jaeger LeCoultre watch:  http://www.portero.com

He is planning to upgrade his camera to a new, state-of-the-art Leica digital, with 10 megapixels:  http://www.amazon.com

Former girlfriend Jeanette once invited him to take a vacation with her to a villa in Marbella, Spain.   http://www.dmproperties.com

He is appalled by the unfashionable grey felt shoes with zippers, worn by his brother, who lives in Norway.   Photo by Ivan Gulei:   http://m.123rf.com

“It’s no longer any use begging for our rights by appealing to the regime, because it will not listen.  But if a million Egyptians went out to the streets in protest or announced a general strike, if that happened, even once, the regime would immediately heed the people’s demands.  Change, as far as it goes, is possible and imminent, but there is a price we have to pay for it.”—Alaa Al Aswany, in an article published by the opposition press in Egypt, a year before the revolution.

Alaa Al Aswany made his literary mark in 2002 when he wrote The Yacoubian Building, a novel set in one apartment building in central Cairo which illustrates virtually all the pressures within Egypt.  It was “the best-selling novel in the Middle East for two years and the inspiration for the biggest budget movie ever produced in Egypt,” according to National Geographic.  Now Al Aswany may become even more famous for a series of articles he wrote for the Egyptian opposition press from 2005 to the present. Always a promoter of human rights, which he believed were being trampled under the thirty-year rule of Hosni Mubarak, who also appeared to be preparing the country for a handover of power to his son Gamal, the author was a vocal supporter of those who began to challenge Mubarak publicly.

In a series of regular articles and columns that he wrote for an Egyptian audience, beginning in 2005, Al Aswany uses his literary power and popularity to try to reach all elements of Egyptian society, examining some of the issues which have separated Egyptians from each other, in an effort to show the importance of cooperation for the larger purpose of bringing about democracy in a country which has known only despotism, poverty, and corruption for decades.  This book, published by the American University in Cairo Press, is a collection of these articles, concentrated primarily between the summer of 2009 and October, 2010.  Explaining complex issues in language which all can understand, Al Aswany works toward a new beginning in Egypt.  Few who read these articles now will doubt their impact on the populace, leading eventually to the demonstrations in Tahrir Square and the far-reaching revolution which took place between January 25, 2011 and February 11, 2011.

Tahrir Square

At the beginning of the book, Al Aswany ponders why Egypt has not had a revolution, despite the fact that “the level of corruption in government circles was unprecedented in the history of Egypt.” Among the many reasons he gives is the fact that repression was so all-pervasive that the populace, over two or three generations, had learned to submit to it.  Though he regards this as cowardice, he understands the forces at work, and also recognizes that no organized system has existed to provide a way for the masses to rebel.  Everyone has to work, if they are lucky enough to have jobs, and all have stayed alive by seeking individual solutions to the economic and personal crises they have faced.  Many talented and educated people have left the country because they cannot get jobs if they do not know people in government who will hire them, and Egyptians have traditionally looked for compromises to avoid confrontation.  The poor starve.  More recently, Saudi oil money, with the blessing of the Mubarak regime, has led to the promotion of Wahhabi Islam within Egypt, a very conservative and fundamental interpretation of Islam which requires obeying the ruler (no matter how corrupt he may be).

Hosni Mubarak and son Gamal

Many of the local television stations, owned by Saudis,  continually feature uneducated “Islamic” preachers who represent “the worst of Islam” and appeal specifically to the poor, uneducated, and often illiterate in an effort to sway them to the extremely conservative Wahhabi point of view.  As the author points out, these uneducated preachers earn huge salaries, while the dedicated Islamic preachers that he knew when he was growing up often had no money, ministering to the poor without recompense.  Wahhabi wives and daughters are required to wear the niqab, as they do in Saudi Arabia.  As recently as the 1970s, however, Egyptian women were treated as real human beings, not as sex objects, despite the fact that they wore modern clothing that revealed their arms and legs.  Ironically, sexual harassment was much less common then than in the present.  A recent ruling in Wahhabist Saudi Arabia has gone so far as to say that women with particularly beautiful eyes are a distraction that leads to men’s sexual excitement, and some groups have responded by now requiring women to wear niqabs that reveal only one eye. (See photo in photo credits.)  For Mubarak, the more women who were taken out of the equation as human beings, the more secure the regime could feel.

Mohamed ElBaradei on his return to Egypt

Comprehensive examples of the Mubarak regime’s many long-standing economic and social abuses, too numerous to mention here, are cited in these articles, which cover just about every issue in Egyptian life, including religion.  Of particular significance to the author is the fact that President Mubarak has not defended Egypt even when Egyptians have been detained and flogged in Saudi Arabia.  Nor has he defended them when they have been tortured in Kuwait.  Or when Egyptian soldiers were killed by Israelis on the Egyptian border. Or when Egyptians were attacked by Algerians during a World Cup soccer match.  Young Egyptian men were detained while trying to greet Nobel Peace Prize winner Mohamed ElBaradei when he returned home from Austria, where he has been living.  ElBaradei represented such a threat to the Mubarak government—and the succession of Gamal to the presidency—that he was escorted out of the airport via another gate to avoid the enthusiastic crowd that had gathered.

On January 25, 2011, when a call went out on the internet to demonstrate in Tahrir Square, about 200 – 300 people were expected.  Over a million showed up.  The revolution began.  The author was there giving speeches for eighteen straight days, returning home only briefly during that time, because, he says over and over again, “Democracy is the solution.”  An eye-opening and important book for everyone who cares about justice.

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on  http://www.buecher.at

Tahrir Square during the revolution is from:  http://en.wikipedia.org

Hosni and Gamal Mubarak at the World Economic Forum in 2009:   http://www.georgeweyman.com

Mohamed ElBaradei, Nobel Prize Peace Prize winner in 2005, is the former head of the International Atomic Energy Commission.  Often thought to be a possible successor to President Mubarak, he prefers to remain in private life.  Here he returns to Egypt from his home in Vienna on January, 27, 2011, two days after the Tahrir Square demonstration began.  http://kiaoragaza.wordpress.com

Mubarak’s exit as President was announced by his hand-picked vice president, Omar Suleiman, in a terse, one-sentence statement:  ‘My fellow citizens,’ Suleiman said. ‘President Mubarak has decided to waive the office of president.’  The celebration is seen here: http://www.rferl.org

The one-eyed niqab, advocated by some Wahhabists may be seen here:  http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com

Also by Al Aswany:  THE YACOUBIAN BUILDING

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »