Feed on
Posts
Comments

“El Bahja [Algiers] is sick…Everywhere, slovenly cops harass their people, except when there’s a riot and immense crowds gather in public places…The fundamentalists are inching ahead, good people are pulling down walls and the young are seeking the terrible darkness of despair in shadowy doorways.”

Set in 1988, twenty-five years after Algeria’s independence from France, the country is still suffering from political instability, corruption, and the residual rivalries and hatreds between those who supported French rule during the war and the FLN and other groups, socialist and otherwise, which fought against French rule. The internecine rivalries and hatreds among a multitude of these local groups, many of which shared the same general goals during the war, have divided families and continued into the next generation with even more bloodshed.  The devastated economy at the end of the war has not been improved, people are living in poverty, religious fundamentalism is growing, the young have no future, and citizens everywhere are casting jaded eyes on those who reek of success—shady businessmen, corrupt politicians, and those who have achieved their wealth at the expense of their fellow citizens.

In this newest installment of the Inspector Llob series, chronologically the “pre-quel” to the series, author Yasmina Khadra turns a spotlight on Algeria’s devastated country and its demoralized citizens.  Khadra, who admitted his real identity in 2001, is, in reality, Mohammed Moulessehoul, an Algerian army officer/writer who escaped censorship by seeking refuge in France in 2000, where he has lived in seclusion ever since.  His main character, Superintendent Llob, is also a writer—an honest police official who does not compromise.  Smart-mouthed, with a cynical sense of humor and an understanding of the  ironies of everyday life, Llob manages to stay afloat in the murky waters of Algerian bureaucracy, supported by Mina, his loving wife.  His assistant, Lieutenant Lino, is completely ineffective as this novel opens.  He has fallen in love with a gorgeous woman, and as a result, he is spending lavishly on his clothes and appearance, going to restaurants he cannot afford, calling in sick when he is at his fittest, and creating disturbances while drunk and disorderly.

Llob wants to help Lino, but even he becomes impatient when Lino’s excesses come to the attention of the powers that be and start to affect Llob’s own job.  In the meantime, SNP (for “sans nom patronymique,” meaning “no family name”), a serial killer, has received a presidential pardon and is about to be released after spending seven years in an asylum and additional years in jail.  Llob is horrified, especially when he hears tapes of SNP declaring:  “I kill to understand. And I’ll go on killing as long as I don’t understand what pushes a human being to excel in the art of lavishing the most excruciating torments on his fellow men.”  Llob cannot stop the release since an influential a member of the Political Bureau, has signed the papers.  The unusual calm which has permeated Algiers for the past several weeks changes.

In Part II, Lino is back at work, temporarily, but when the chauffeur of a wealthy and influential man is shot to death and the gun used matches Lino’s gun, Lino is arrested, sent to a hellish dungeon, and kept incommunicado, even from Llob.  Another murder sends Llob into the hinterlands with journalist/history professor Soria Karadach, a researcher studying events from August 1962, immediately following the end of the war, especially in Sidi Ba, a small town in which a massacre occurred.  There Llob meets with harkis (Muslim Algerians who worked with the French), maquisards (rural guerrillas who worked with the French Resistance), mujahids, and people claiming to be members of the FLN, socialist freedom-fighters.  None of these people trust any of the others to remember “correctly” what happened in the town, but gradually, the past of one of Algeria’s most famous citizens begins to emerge.

Eventually, the events of Sidi Ba and the arrest of Lino converge, and though the details of the plot are extremely complex, the novel is carefully constructed, and the mystery is fully resolved.  Khadra is an accomplished novelist who creates fully-developed characters, endowing them with deeply human failings and giving them a kind of dark humor which allows them to survive the violence and irrationality they face every day in Algiers.   The betrayals of individuals by each other, of citizens by their leaders, of the law by police, of innocent victims by the judicial system–all contribute to the darkest of noir fiction and a vision of Algiers which makes one want to weep for the victims.

Notes: According to Wiki: “In 2004, Newsweek acclaimed [the author] as “one of the rare writers capable of giving a meaning to the violence in Algeria today.”  http://en.wikipedia.org

His photo is from http://penatlas.org

The flag of the FLN (National Liberation Front, a socialist organization) during the Algerian Civil War appears on  http://flagspot.net

Mourning the victims of the continuing Algerian violence:  http://news.bbc.co.uk

“It hadn’t been easy to guess what it was that Mussolini really meant to do…It wasn’t merely an attempt to rid the state and its appendages from the influence of ‘untrustworthy” individuals: what lay in wait for us was the destruction of our way of life, of our very existence, the absolute and indiscriminate destruction of our world.”

In 1967, an unnamed writer begins writing a long letter to an unknown recipient in Italy, a letter he knows will take weeks, if not months to conclude.  The writer’s references to the Six Day War and to the fact that “here most of the people have no past and no one is surprised” quickly establish the letter writer’s home as Israel, but there are no clues about the person being addressed.  Writing from Tel Aviv, the narrator reconstructs that time in his life “before Israel,” when he lived in Rome and where his parents owned the Albergo della Magnolia, an elegant hotel.

In a straightforward, conversational style, the writer describes himself as a shy, serious student whose extracurricular life has always revolved around the Albergo della Magnolia.  In 1929, when he is in his early twenties, he is on duty for New Year’s Eve at the hotel when beautiful, young Sonia Gentile falls and breaks her leg at a party there.  During her recuperation, Sonia receives the writer’s special attention, and it is not long before they are in love.  Sonia has grown up under fascism as the daughter of a wealthy banker who supports Mussolini’s policies and profits from them, and her family is devoutly Catholic.  The speaker, whom we learn is Dino Carpi, has been only a “twice a year Jew,” on Yom Kippur and Passover, and he ignores the then-unimportant cultural differences to pursue his love of Sonia.  His family is comfortable and well respected, and he is anxious to be accepted by her family, even denying his own culture toward that end.

As Dino writes about the ensuing ten years, he moves from the promise of the 1929 New Year through the “funereal year” of 1938, addressing and bringing alive the step by step process by which Mussolini and the fascists appeal to an inherent Italian bias against Jews and bring about their total isolation from Italian life.  The plain, unadorned narrative achieves its power from its simplicity—its seeming logic—and from the naivete of the love-blinded characters, as one ominous fascist declaration after another is glossed over, no one believing that such policies are really as draconian as they may appear.  As polite handshakes give way to salutes, Levi explores the love story of Sonia and Dino, but when in 1938, the government issues the Manifesto of Racist Scientists, in which a “pure Italian race” is lauded—and Jews “do not belong to the Italian race”—the inevitability of the fascist goals are obviously clear.

A census in which every resident must indicate his race, the declaration that Jewish students cannot attend public schools, a new law prohibiting Jews from owning property worth more than a certain amount and forbidding of Jews from running businesses, inevitably change the fabric of the society, but the change is gradual and for most of the characters, all of whom are engaged in active everyday lives, the long-term impact is not fully grasped.  The love of Sonia and Dino is increasingly tested by political forces, and their families begin to exert ever more pressure on their relationship.

Author Lia Levi succeeds in creating enormous sympathy for her protagonists, in part because the threats to their safety occur so gradually, completely caught up, as they are, in their own daily lives.  The conclusion, however, is stunning, powerful despite its inevitability, simply because the protagonists did not expect it or believe it, despite all the warnings.  And though the reader also knows, from history, what the outcome will be, it is impossible not to hope for a different result because the characters deserve better.  The last pages, which resolve any questions the reader may have, are poignant for the feelings they reveal by and about the characters and for the sympathy they inspire in the reader.  Filled with wonderfully observed descriptions, this deliberately simple story is all the more powerful for its clarity and its unambiguous presentation of everyday life in pre-war Italy, a subject which has received little literary attention.

Notes: The author’s photo and an interview by Paola Sergi appear on http://www.belletrista.com

The photo of Benito Mussolini with Adolf Hitler, from the National Archives, appears on http://www.emersonkent.com

A copy of the odious Manifesto of Racist Scientists may be read in Italian and English on http://users.dickinson.edu

“I am going to die and there is a flavor that has been teasing my taste buds and my heart and I simply cannot recall it. I know that this particular flavor is the first and ultimate truth of my entire life, and that it holds the key to a heart that I have silenced.”

Pierre Arthens, a French food critic who regards himself as “the greatest food critic in the world,” has just discovered that he is dying, with only forty-eight hours to live.  A resident of the Rue de Grenelle apartment building which is the center of Barbery’s The Elegance of the Hedgehog, Arthens looks back on his life, trying, in his last hours, to remember the most special flavor of his lifetime, an effort to give his life meaning.  As a critic, he has made and destroyed reputations with his pronouncements, but now, on his deathbed, he is vulnerable, forced against his will to confront what he has regarded as his life and to understand where he really fits into life’s grand scheme.

As a protagonist, Pierre is less than sympathetic.  His children refuse to come to his deathbed, not surprisingly since he does not love them, has never loved them, and feels no remorse on their account.  “The only paternity that I might lay claim to is that of my own oeuvre,” he has decided, believing that children are just “monstrous excrescences of our own selves.”  His son Jean has concluded that “I have never been anything other than the son of a monster.”  His daughter Laura regards him as a “brutal man,” smug, never relaxed, and, more importantly, never at home.  Another son, Clemence, remains outside the narrative, regarded, like his siblings, as an imbecile.  As son Jean observes, “You could have made them gods, your kids…My sorry life has been spent longing ardently for all the love you have withheld,”  Arthens’ wife Anna, a trophy wife, has known from the outset of their long marriage that she is not a priority, but she also knows that he will always return home to her, not to any his many mistresses, and that is enough for her.

Alternating Pierre’s comments about his life with comments by family members and others who have strong feeling about Arthens and his attitudes, author Muriel Barbery recreates in lush and elaborate prose the life of this difficult and unlikable man.  His family background; his youthful vacations in Tangiers, the home of his mother; his vacations with his wife and children in Brittany and Timos, Greece;  his discovery of the incredible taste of fresh tomatoes, while sitting under a linden tree at the home of his coarse Aunt Marthe, a “piece of human scum casting her rotten foul stench onto everything around her”; his experience of a perfect meal of shrimp with rice, prepared by his uncle Jacques Destrieres; a meal of oysters, smoked ham, bread and butter and apple tart in the countryside of France; and his discovery of Scotch whisky at the age of fifteen while visiting his grandfather’s friend, all contribute to the fond memories Arthens has of the gastronomic experiences which have informed his personal and professional life.  No one is sad that he is dying.

A novella, rather than a novel, this often charming look at the life of an impossible man who waxes ecstatic about food, its preparation, and its presentation.  Resembling a fruitcake overfilled with sweetmeats, rather than a traditional narrative, the novel might be described, in Arthens terms, as consisting of “succulent” language enhanced by “intoxicating” and “effulgent” imagery, which is marinated in “astringent,” “full-bodied” cynicism.  By the time Arthens identifies the perfect flavor that he has been trying to remember, the reader feels as if s/he has partaken of a ten-course meal, the dessert to which is somewhat anti-climactic.  The book is uneven and self-conscious, but its wry depiction of the overweening self-importance of food critics and their purple prose makes it fun to read–a fascinating and stylish introduction to some of the ideas which Barbery, six years later, will bring to more controlled fruition in The Elegance of the Hedgehog.

Notes: The author’s photo appears on http://www.washingtonpost.com

Naguib Mahfouz–THE MIRAGE

Note: Naguib Mahfouz was WINNER of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1988.

“My mother and my life were one and the same….Hardly can I think of any aspect of my life without her beautiful, loving face appearing before me.  She stands ever and always behind both my hopes and my sufferings, behind both my love and my hatred….It’s as though she herself was everything I’ve ever loved or hated.”

Naguib Mahfouz is a never-ending source of literary surprises.  In this unusual and often charming novel from 1948, newly translated and republished by the American University of Cairo, Mahfouz writes his only Freudian, psychological study, an analysis of Kamil Ru’ba Laz, a young Egyptian man so dominated by his mother that he is unable to make a single decision or form a single successful relationship with the outside world.   When the novel opens, his mother has just died, and Kamil, in his mid-twenties, is devastated.  Though he believes that “people who write are, generally speaking, people who aren’t alive,” he recognizes that he was not really alive before his mother’s death.  He hopes that writing will allow him “to remember her and to recover her life…[so that] I may be able to repair the thread of my life that’s been broken.”

The first person novel which results is Kamil’s attempt to put his life into some sort of perspective and, perhaps, to find some hope for the future, some understanding of “life’s true wisdom,” a journey which will take him outside himself for the first time in his life.  As Kamil takes the reader through his family history, other dysfunctional relationships within his family are revealed.   Kamil never knows his father, but when Radiya and Medhat, the two older children, are aged ten and nine, their father claims them, in accord with Islamic law, wresting them from their mother and preventing her from seeing them for many years, leaving her with only Kamil, a small child, to love.

His mother nurtures what Kamil later recognizes as an “unwholesome relationship…a kind of affection that destroys.”  He is never out of his mother’s sight and is encouraged to depend on her totally—sleeping in the same room and having no sense of personal privacy.  He grows up isolated, unable to meet other young people or have friends, terrified of the outside world, and excruciatingly shy, completely unable to speak to strangers.  School is a disaster.  Only dreams bring escape.  When he has reached his twenties and has started working as a clerk in the War Ministry, he notes, “I seem to have been destined not to know anything about life’s true wisdom, and I’d never gone beyond the narrow confines of my own soul.”

With a totally egocentric life, and a mother who constantly massages that ego while simultaneously demanding his full attention, Kamil is certainly not a candidate for true love, which he has no way of understanding, but Mahfouz introduces Kamil’s desire for a wife as the turning point of the book.  His search for love, his selection of the woman of his dreams, the complications this potential relationship creates with his mother, the effects of his pathological fears on any long-term relationship, and his complete naivete about sex and what it means to be a husband all reflect the influence of his early childhood on his adult life.  Kamil, in his mid-twenties, is still a child, emotionally, with no idea of how to communicate with the outside world on any level.

Mahfouz has created in Kamil a main character whom it is difficult to like, and now, sixty years after this book was written, it is somewhat difficult even to empathize with him since times have changed so much.  Still, Kamil’s conversational style, his charm, and his easy-going humor about growing up keep the reader completely engaged, hoping for Kamil’s success even when tempted to give up on him as a lost cause. Firmly grounded in the psychological conundrum that Kamil represents, Mahfouz stays true to his subject as he explores the effects of family on character, taking the extreme examples of Kamil and his mother to their limits to evaluate whether or not there is some kernel of individuality which can survive even the most extreme influences in order to preserve one’s essence and allow for growth in new and  contrary directions.

ALSO:  THE DAY THE LEADER WAS KILLED,     KARNAK CAFE,     CAIRO MODERN,     IN THE TIME OF LOVE

Notes: Many other novels by Naguib Mahfouz posted here.  See Authors’ tab at the top of the Home page, if interested.

The author’s photo is from http://en.wikipedia.org


“I used to read a big padded glove-leather edition of Tennyson on lunch break every day when I worked for a mutual fund…and it was as heavy and soft as a catcher’s mitt.  You could thump it with your fist.  Hurl it at me, Alfred Lord, baby.  Smack me with that fastball of ‘low large moon.’ “

The sly humor of the cover, with its luscious plum, sets the tone for this rich, iconoclastic novel about poetry and the writing life.  Paul Chowder, the speaker, has achieved modest success by writing “plums…That’s what I call a poem that doesn’t rhyme…We who write and publish our nonrhyming plums aren’t poets, we’re plummets.”  Chowder has just compiled an anthology of poetry which he hopes will, one day, be used as the comprehensive anthology for college students and as a source of pleasure by all those who savor the music of language.  Choosing the poems for the anthology was, for him, “like [being] that blond bitch-goddess on Project Runway,” and he must now write the forty-page introduction.  His publisher is desperate for it, and Chowder has writer’s block.

Sitting in a shaft of light on the second floor of his barn in southern Maine, searching vainly for inspiration, he regards himself as a “study in failure.”  Roz, the love of his life for the past eight years, has finally had enough of his dithering and has left him;  he is in debt;  his house (inherited from his parents) needs repairs;  he is drowning in a sea of clutter; and he cannot focus on anything long enough to act.  As he thinks about his unwritten introduction, he skitters from perceptive comments about poetry and the creative life to mundane annoyances, juxtaposing unlikely subjects which keep the reader surprised and entertained.  In two successive sentences, for example, he remarks that “You have to suffer to be a human being who can help people understand suffering.  I have a mouse in my kitchen.”   Later, while eating a messy egg salad sandwich, he “wiped some of the night’s kinked mouse droppings from the stovetop…and thought of a poet named Ed Ochester.”

In a voice so “human” he sounds like an alterego for author Nicholson Baker, Chowder demystifies poetry—and plums—making often hilarious comments about the structure of language, the history of poetry, the lives of famous poets, and about his own struggles.  His free-flowing, not-quite-stream-of-consciousness style allows him to connect contemporary culture (and the reader) with the most serious academic subjects:  “At some point,” Chowder says, “you have to set aside snobbery and what you think is culture and recognize that any random episode of “Friends” is probably better, more uplifting for the human spirit, than ninety-nine percent of the poetry or drama or fiction or history ever published.”  He enjoys watching the Dick Van Dyke Show, but he also loves poets W. S. Merwin and Mary Oliver, both of whom have written poems that are explored here.

Not satiric and not anti-academic, so much as “anti-ponderous” and “anti-pompous,” Chowder is a true believer in the importance of good poetry and its ability to connect directly with our essential human nature by conveying unique visions of the world in a unique “music.”   “My life is necessary,” he asserts, “because I sustain the idea of poetry through thick and thin.  That’s my job.”  For him, being a great poet just means that you “wrote one or two great poems.  Or great parts of poems.  That’s all it means.”  Conferences, workshops, and readings are “nonsense…a joke.”

And what makes a good poem, according to Paul Chowder (and, we assume, author Nicholson Baker)?  “Poetry,” he believes, “is [among other things] a controlled refinement of sobbing,” in which rhyme helps in the avoidance of pain by moving the reader along, “like chain-smoking.”   His emphasis on rhyme is ironic, however, since he, himself, has had more success with free verse.  He sees the rhythm of poetry as “a strolling rhythm.  Or a dancing rhythm.”  He illustrates the various meters, and he sets some poems to music, providing the musical notation.  Poetry, in essence, is something that must be felt and heard as music, and the reader must join in its song if it is to be effective.  Chock full of “a-ha” moments, the novel is a treasure trove of information and observation about poetry and poets, told with robust humor.  (On my Favorites List for 2009)

Notes: The author’s photo and an audiostream interview with him appear on http://www.writersvoice.net

Baker wrote this book in his barn in South Berwick, Maine, perhaps one that resembles this Maine barn:  http://www.barnyardvet.com/, a lovely site belonging to Larry Buggia, DVM, who photographs and comments on Maine life.

The LA Times has a long story about Baker and his life:  http://www.latimes.com

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »