Feed on
Posts
Comments

“I’ve told you before and I’ll tell you again: Justice ought to be a bottom-line proposition…It’s misguided when we worship musty old words in a text at the expense of innocent people’s suffering. Thomas Jefferson and Learned Hand and hearsay rules ought to come into play if we don’t know the truth or if it’s a close call…We should be concerned with how the soup tastes and not so damn worried about the particulars of the chef’s hat.”

In this absorbing fictionalization of a real murder case from 1984, author Martin Clark, a Virginia circuit court judge, explores the increasingly fraught predicament of a rural Virginia Commonwealth’s attorney, Mason Hunt, who makes the only decision that makes sense to him as a naïve young man. He must then live with that decision and re-examine its consequences for the next twenty years.

In the opening pages, Mason is still a law student when he accompanies his 27-year-old brother Gates to a party at the trailer belonging to Gates’s girlfriend. Despite their age difference, Mason and Gates have forged a close bond, built on Gates’s protection of Mason from their sadistic father. Gates, at 6’ 5” tall, has never hesitated to go toe to toe against his father, who is, for him, the symbol of a hostile outside world. By the time his father has abandoned the family, however, Gates is so filled with rage and so damaged that he believes the world owes him, big-time, for the abuse he has suffered. At twenty-seven, Gates is still living at home with his mother, lacking ambition, unable to hold a job, and finding escape in drugs and alcohol.

Mason, on the other hand, has taken advantage of his opportunities, winning scholarships which have allowed him to attend law school, but he has never forgotten that it is Gates who has made much of his success possible. At the party that fateful night, Gates argues with Wayne Thompson, who has had a brief relationship with Denise, Gates’s girlfriend, but it is not until Gates, drunk and high on drugs, leaves the party with Mason much later that the issue escalates into a confrontation and violence and Gates shoots Wayne Thompson, leaving him dead beside the road. There are no witnesses—except Mason, who moves instinctively to protect his older brother from self-destruction. The two escape into the night, with Mason crafting an alibi for himself and Gates by stopping at various places, making phone calls, getting rid of the murder weapon, and then acting as if nothing has happened.

Examined in detail, Mason’s decisions that night, impaired by his unaccustomed drinking, become the crux of the increasingly complicated novel which ensues. Years pass in which the case remains unsolved, and Mason goes on to become a lawyer and eventually a Commonwealth’s attorney, while Gates ends up in prison on another matter. Inevitably, however, Mason must pay for his mistakes, and justice must be served.

Clark tells a lively tale which moves along so speedily that I read the first hundred pages one night when I had intended to read only the first chapter, and then stayed up till well past midnight the following night to read the remaining two hundred fifty pages, unable to put the book down. His characters, often quirky, leap off the page in their realism, and the reader identifies with them and their problems, even though they may deserve the consequences which await them. By inserting carefully observed details of natural behavior into his scenes, Clark creates “real” people who actually behave like real people. Nothing is simple, we see, and no decision is ever made in a vacuum or can remain in one.

The real murder case at the heart of his novel occurred in Stuart, Virginia, the small, rural community where author Martin Clark lives. Situated on the Virginia border, about twenty miles north of Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Stuart is so vibrantly described here that it becomes the equivalent of a character. The author’s affection for Stuart and appreciation of its way of life, removed from the hurly-burly mainstream, shines through, despite all the economic problems inherent in any remote, rural location. Stuart “makes sense,” as Clark depicts it, and the novel’s characters, their way of life, and their values are natural outgrowths of life there.

As in his two previous novels, The Many Aspects of Mobile Home Living and Plain Heathen Mischief, Clark examines justice as a relative term, complicated by each character’s understanding of right and wrong, innocence and guilt, theological sin and salvation, and real-life success and failure, all of which affect their values and beliefs about what is “right.” The author explores the consequences that result when someone commits a short term wrong in order to achieve what he believes is a long-term right, sharing this exploration with the reader, along with the far-reaching consequences.  (On my Favorites List for 2008)

ALSO by Martin Clark:  THE SUBSTITUTION ORDER,  and  PLAIN HEATHEN MISCHIEF (posted on another website in 2004)

Notes: The author’s photo appears on http://www.randomhouse.com

The Patrick County Courthouse in Stuart, Virginia, appears on http://en.wikipedia.org/

“If someone threatens [Salander] with a gun, she’ll get a bigger gun.”

Continuing the story of Lisbeth Salander which he began in The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, Swedish author Stieg Larsson creates a fascinating character study of a young woman with a terrible past, a young woman who also suffers from a form of autism. Salander, having worked with Mikael Blomqvist in the preceding novel, in which she used her formidable skills as a computer hacker to help him solve a major mystery, is on her own for most of this one. For reasons Blomqvist does not understand, she has refused to have anything at all to do with him, though they had had a relationship in the previous novel, and seemed to care greatly for each other.

Salander has just recently returned from her travels around the world–using her substantial financial resources. Her hacking skills have allowed her to acquire an enormous bank account, and only Blomqvist is aware of how she has done it. She is fearful of the future–as she should be, considering her terrible past–and she is doing whatever she can to live a secret life in a luxury apartment that no one else knows about.

A mistress of disguise, the people in her building have no idea what she really looks like or who she really is. Gradually, the reader becomes familiar with her background, her family, the reasons for her institutionalization as a young teenager, and the horrifying abuse she faced at the hands of her legal guardian, a lawyer supposed to protect her. A woman who believes devoutly in an eye for an eye, she has exacted her revenge upon him in ways he does not dare share with anyone else.

Blomqvist, in the meantime, has continued with his work running Millenium magazine, which has been working on an article about the sex trade, its connection with the drug trade, and the high-ranking police and political officials who are involved in it. The two people who have been doing the investigative reporting for Millenium plan to name names in their expose. They are murdered before they can conclude their work.

Three different investigations into the murders begin, and all center on Salander, whose fingerprints are found on the murder weapon. She, in self-defense, uses her computer skills, once again, to read e-mails and the contents of Blomqvist’s and others’ computers to stay ahead of the investigators who are seeking her for murder.

Larsson does a terrific job developing sympathy (and even admiration) for Salander, a woman whose violent behavior sometimes makes her hard to distinguish from the sadistic criminals who are pursuing her, and readers who enjoyed the previous novel will enjoy this one, too, as she becomes a more complete character.

The action moves very quickly, despite the book’s length, and the author’s gradual revelations about Salander’s background add to the suspense and make her actions impossible to predict.

Though Salander disappears from the action for significant periods of time, Larsson keeps the tension high by involving the people around her in high drama. Unfortunately, he relies very heavily on coincidence to resolve the action as the novel heads toward its conclusion, and the final revelations strain credulity to the breaking point. Still, the book is fun to read, especially for fans of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

Notes: The author’s photo by Per Jarl/Expo/SCANPIX/PA appears here: http://www.guardian.co.uk

Also reviewed here:  By Stieg Larsson:    THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO  and   THE GIRL WHO KICKED THE HORNET’S NEST.

By David Lagercrantz:  THE GIRL IN THE SPIDER’S WEB,     THE GIRL WHO TAKES AN EYE FOR AN EYE,    THE GIRL WHO LIVED TWICE

The Swedish films made from these books are also reviewed here:  THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO (FILM),      THE GIRL WHO PLAYED WITH FIRE (FILM),      THE GIRL WHO KICKED THE HORNET’S NEST (FILM)

 

“I’m a guest here, not an inmate.”

When Mrs. Palfrey, a genteel, elderly widow, arrives with her possessions at the formerly elegant Claremont Hotel in London, she expects “something quite different.” Planning to stay at least a month, possibly permanently, she prefers her independence in this aging London hotel to living in Scotland near her daughter, who prefers to ignore her. A variety of elderly eccentrics call the Claremont home, and though the residents put up a good front, their loneliness and boredom are obvious–no one visits them, they rarely leave the hotel, and nothing in their lives changes very much.

When she falls while walking one day, Mrs. Palfrey is rescued by Ludovic Meyer, a struggling young writer. Because of his kindness and her pleasure in his attention, she invites him to dinner, where the residents assume he is her grandson Desmond. Ludo/Desmond is everything that the other residents of the hotel long for–he genuinely cares for Mrs. Palfrey, he listens to her, and he recognizes her value. Having never known a normal family life, Ludo needs Mrs. Palfrey as much as she needs him, and she happily becomes his much-appreciated “grandmother.”

As the two develop a close relationship, Mrs. Palfrey teaches Ludo by example about love and its pleasures, and he, having failed in past relationships, begins to understand what love means, blossoming under her attention. As Mrs. Palfrey reminisces, he takes notes for a story he plans to write about her life and her experiences at the Claremont, where the informal motto is “We Aren’t Allowed to Die Here.” As time passes and life becomes more complicated for both of them, their relationship is tested.

Filled with eccentric characters who respond to aging in different ways, this 1975 novel shows a feisty Mrs. Palfrey challenging convention by reveling in her relationship with Ludo. With an unerring eye for the telling detail and the perfectly revealing comment, the author brings universal themes to vibrant life–the passage of time, the aging process, the compromises we make, and our continuing need to be accepted. The author never resorts to caricature as she makes her wry observations, respecting her characters even when presenting them in sometimes bleakly humorous scenes. In this unforgettable comic masterpiece, old age is shown as a stage in life, one in which rewards and happiness are more important than the inevitable conclusion.  (On my Favorites List for 2008.)

Credits: The author’s photo appears on http://www.librarything.com through the courtesy of the New York Public Library.

Just as wonderful a film as it is a novel, the award-winning film stars Dame Joan Plowright and newcomer Rupert Friend.  The photo by Jerome Prebois comes from the film.  http://123nonstop.com/

ALSO by Elizabeth Taylor:  A GAME OF HIDE AND SEEK,

A VIEW OF THE HARBOUR, ANGEL



MRS. PALFREY AT THE CLAREMONT
REVIEW. Classic Novel, England, Film connection, Humor, Satire, Absurdity, Literary, VIDEO TRAILER.
Written by: Elizabeth Taylor
Published by: Virago UK
Date Published: 04/01/2006
Edition: Reprint
ISBN: 978-1844083213
Available in: Ebook Paperback Hardcover

“Madame Michel has the elegance of the hedgehog: on the outside, she’s covered in quills, a real fortress, but my gut feeling is that on the inside, she has the same simple refinement as the hedgehog: a deceptively indolent little creature, fiercely solitary—and terribly elegant.”

With sales of over half a million copies in Europe, this clever novel, newly released in the United States, may make Muriel Barbery as much of a literary phenomenon here as she is there, despite the novel’s unusual philosophical focus. The first narrator, Renee Michel, is a fifty-four-year-old woman who has been working for twenty-seven years as concierge of a small Parisian apartment building. Describing herself as a “proletarian autodidact,” she explains that she grew up poor and had to quit school at age twelve to work in the fields, but throughout her life she has been studying philosophy secretly, insatiable in her quest for knowledge about who she is and how she fits into the grand scheme of life.

Renee is grateful for her job as concierge, but she finds it prudent to keep her rich intellectual life hidden from the residents. Because she has no other future, she maintains the façade of the perfect concierge, someone who lives in a completely different world from them. She hides her books and even buys two TVs, keeping them turned on so that the residents will regard her as a typical, TV-watching employee.

Alternating with Renee’s thoughts about her life and the books she has been reading, are the musings of Paloma Josse, the twelve-year-old daughter of wealthy parents whose father is Minister of the Republic and whose mother, with a PhD in education, has an active professional life. Like Renee, Paloma pretends to be just average, carefully constructing her own façade so that she can fit in at school, though she has the intellectual level of a senior in college. With an older sister who torments her, Paloma is a child who has fallen through the cracks, ignored by her parents and within the school society in which she must pretend every day to be just average, a terrible strain. She has decided that on her thirteenth birthday, she will take the only path open to her: she will commit suicide, burning down her house at the same time.

She has, however, given herself an “out.” She believes that beauty can elevate humans, and she is seeking “whatever is beautiful enough to give life meaning…If I find something, then I may rethink my options: if I find a body with beautiful movement or, failing that, a beautiful idea for the mind, well then maybe I’ll think that life is worth living.”

As the lives of Renee and Paloma unfold and sometimes overlap, the rough parallels in their lives become obvious, not just in their isolation and in their need to hide their talents but in the motifs that the author establishes. Nature and its concern with moments of perfect beauty, life, and death pervade the novel. In one hilariously ironic variation of this theme, Neptune, a dog who lives in the apartment house, is observed by both Renee and Paloma as he discovers kairos, “the perfect moment”—when he mates vigorously with the whippet belonging to another resident, to the horror of the stodgy residents.

When one of the residents dies and his family decides to sell the apartment to a new owner, the novel reaches its turning point. Kakuro Ozu, whom Renee thinks may be related to the Japanese film maker that she most admires, moves in. All their lives change.

Barbery is a skilled writer with a great ability to combine the philosophy of Renee’s studies—from Husserl’s phenomenology, to determinism and Kant’s idealism—with aesthetics and the desire of both Renee and Paloma to find true beauty in art, poetry, and life itself. Always, however, she remembers that she is writing a story, with characters who must appeal to the reader. As Renee and Ozu become friends and as Paloma begins to identify with them and share confidences with Ozu, all change their views of who they are and what their lives might be.

By the time the novel ends, the reader understands both the characters and the forces that have made them the people they are, hoping at the same time that all will manage to find happiness. Motifs from Japanese film and the novels of Tolstoy combine with images celebrating the perennial beauty of flowers (especially the camellia) and the connection of beauty with death, adding universality to the stories of these characters and connecting them to broader themes. Thoughtful, ironic, and often darkly humorous, the novel creates moods which bring the characters vividly to life, even as they are contemplating the deepest of life’s mysteries. (On my Favorites List for 2008.)

Also reviewed here:  Barbery’s  GOURMET RHAPSODY

Credits: The author’s photo appears on http://babelio.wordpress.com/

The photo of Renee Michel (Josiane Balansko) is from the French film of this novel and appears on http://www.madman.com.au/actions/video.do?method=view&videoId=1940

The photos of Kakuro Ozu (Togo Igawa) and Paloma Josse (Garance le Guillermic)  are also from the French film of this novel:  http://www.cinemagia.ro/filme/le-herisson-471497/imagini/413234/

The wonderful video trailer of this film is here:  http://www.madman.com.au/actions/video.do?method=view&videoId=1940

Peter Carey–THEFT

Note: Peter Carey is a two-time WINNER of the Booker Prize.

“Artists are used to humiliation.  We start with it and we are always ready to return to real failure, the bottom of the barrel, the destruction of our talent by alcohol or misery.  We live with the knowledge that, alongside Cezanne or Picasso, we are no-one, were always no-one, will be forgotten before we are in the ground.  Shame, doubt, self-loathing, all this we eat for breakfast every day.”

Peter Carey, one of Australia’s most honored contemporary writers, creates his most dazzling novel yet with this send-up of the art world, filled with satire about dealers, auction houses, compulsive collectors, forgers, conservators and technicians, art researchers, catalogue writers, those who crate and ship paintings, and even the artists themselves.  At the same time, he creates two splendid characters through whose limited vision this world is viewed—Michael “Butcher” Boone, a successful avant-garde artist from Australia, now experiencing hard times, and his “slow” brother Hugh, a 220-pound giant with little control over his emotions and a penchant for breaking the little fingers of people who get in his way.

Butcher, who lost his best paintings when they were declared “marital assets” during a particularly nasty divorce, has just been released from jail after trying to steal them back, and he is now living in the “boonies” of northern New South Wales, as caretaker for the property of his biggest collector, Jean-Paul Milan.  Jean-Paul has given him a place to stay and studio space so he can create new masterpieces (from which he expects a cut).  But Butcher is not living alone.  He has also become the full-time caretaker of his brother, “Hugh the Poet and Hugh the Murderer, Hugh the Idiot Savant,” and life is not easy for either of them.  “Sometimes [Hugh] was so bloody smart, so coherent, at other times a wailing gibbering fool.  Sometimes he adored me, loudly, passionately, like a whiskery bad-breathed child.  But the next day or next minute I would be the Leader of the Opposition and he would lay in wait amongst the wild lantana, pounce, wrestle me violently into the mud, or the river, or across the engorged wet-season zucchini.”

Six months after their arrival in New South Wales, when floods accompany the rainy season and travel is especially difficult, Butcher rescues Marlene Leibovitz from her partially submerged car, a “chance” meeting that may not be so chancy.  Marlene is the wife of Olivier Leibovitz, the only son of Jacques Leibovitz, a world-class artist whose paintings would be priceless, were it not for the fact that the art market always has a price, however stratospheric–and a buyer, individual or corporate.  Marlene has come to this remote area to inspect a “Leibovitz” painting owned by the mysterious Dozy Boylan, Butcher’s next-door neighbor.  As the wife of Leibovitz’s son Olivier, Marlene shares with him the “droit moral,” the sole right to authenticate Leibovitz paintings. Some years ago, Leibovitz’s now-deceased wife Dominique and her lover stole fifty finished, unfinished, and abandoned paintings in the hours before the police were informed of Leibovitz’s death, and the person with the droit moral (in this case, Marlene, through Olivier) controls the Liebovitz market by authenticating the undocumented paintings as they surface.

The story of how Butcher is drawn into a complex scheme to defraud is told in alternating chapters by Butcher himself and by Hugh, who sees himself as his brother’s “helper,” not “manservant,” though he often inveighs against Butcher and his attitudes.  Hugh is earthy—he sees Van Gogh as “mad as a toilet brush”—and his “take” on the characters and action lead to hilarious commentary.  Butcher, never able to escape the responsibility for Hugh, is also trying to recover his reputation by creating a new set of masterpieces, and he is soon preparing for a show Marlene has set up for him in Tokyo—if he can figure out how to find a caretaker for Hugh.  Totally devoted to his artwork, and eventually to Marlene, Butcher is a brawling innocent, completely over his head as he begins to move in international art circles in Tokyo and New York.

The action ratchets up as the financial stakes in the art market increase, and a murder, filled with shocking details, draws the complexity of the art fraud into the open for the reader—and for Butcher.  The final chapter, almost an Afterword, gives new meaning to the word “irony.”  Theft is brilliantly constructed, and in Butcher and Hugh, Carey creates two narrators the reader cannot help but care about.  No aspect of the art world and the rarified atmosphere of its collectors escapes Carey’s rapier wit, and the humor is non-stop.  Well known for his word play and sense of the absurd throughout his novels, Carey has outdone himself with this novel, one of his best–a comic masterpiece. (On my Favorites List for 2006)

ALSO by Peter Carey:  THE CHEMISTRY OF TEARS,      A LONG WAY FROM HOME

Notes: The author’s photo appears on http://www.thechronicle.com.au

The art gallery image is from http://www.topboxdesign.com

 

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »