Feed on
Posts
Comments

Colm Toibin–THE MASTER

When his brother William asks novelist Henry James what is the “moral” of his stories, James replies, “The moral? The moral is the most pragmatic we can imagine, that life is a mystery and that only sentences are beautiful, and that we must be ready for change, especially when we go to Paris, and that no one who has known the sweetness of Paris can properly return to the sweetness of the United States.”

Focusing on the life of Henry James, Colm Toibin’s The Master goes way beyond the usual “novelization” of someone’s biography. Toibin has done a tremendous amount of research and has obviously read everything James has written, but he has so completely distilled all of this information, that in writing this book, he actually recreates Henry James. Most remarkably, he does this while using the third person point of view to tell the story, preserving the objective tone but bringing forth characters and events so vibrant with life that Toibin’s Henry James is the same man that we know from his letters and journals—and from the insights we glean from James’s novels.

The novel opens in 1895, when James’s play, Guy Domville, is booed on opening night. James, now fifty-two, has had high hopes for this play and for a career as a playwright, believing success on stage will put an end to “his long solitary days” and allow him to spend more time among actors, whom he finds fascinating. Described as “a great stranger, with nothing to match his own longings, a man away from his own country, observing the world as a mere watcher from the window,” James, an American by birth, is a lonely and solitary figure throughout the novel, a man unable to form a committed relationship with anyone, either male or female, sometimes wanting companionship but not closeness, and always needing solitude to work.

Through flashbacks, Toibin shows how James’s early upbringing may have been partly responsible for his feelings of isolation, since he and his three brothers and sister moved with their parents around Europe for years. Lacking a sense of security, dependent almost completely on each other for companionship, and always feeling like outsiders with little or no contact with contemporaries at home or abroad, the James siblings formed close attachments with each other and often mere acquaintanceships with others of their social and intellectual level.

When James begins to write, first stories, and then novels, he draws for inspiration on the people he knows best and the events which have affected their lives and his own. His sister Alice is the model for the little girl in The Turn of the Screw, a story idea James receives from the Archbishop of Canterbury. His sympathy for the children of Oscar Wilde, after Wilde’s conviction for lewdness, and the writings of another friend, John Addington Symonds, about the love between two men, evolve into the story of a child whose father is a writer visited by an American who admires his work. His cousin Minny Temple becomes the inspiration for several of his most important female characters—in “Poor Richard,” Daisy Miller, and Portrait of a Lady–and when she dies, after James has refused to bring her to Europe because of her poor health, he guiltily gives her a posthumous trip through Wings of the Dove. His brother Wilky’s serious wounds in the Civil War, from which he recovered at home, provide James with details he includes in other stories. Virtually every aspect of his life works its way into a James story in some form or other, and as he gets inside the psyches of his characters through his fiction, he reveals his own psyche, his sympathies, and his personal conflicts.

Toibin’s dual focus on James’s life and how it is embodied in his fiction, give a powerful immediacy and sense of verisimilitude to this novel, so strong that one cannot help but feel an emotional connection to James, no matter how remote he may seem otherwise. His connections to great families, to writers whose names are well known, and to people who are willing to accept him completely on his own terms provide Toibin with unlimited source material. It is Toibin’s own talents in ordering this information, bringing it to life, and showing its importance in James’s writings, however, which make this novel so important. On the longlist for the Man Booker Prize for the best novel of the year, The Master is a masterful novel which honors Henry James through its careful scholarship and the vibrant recreation of James and the events in his life. A “Must Read” for lovers of Henry James.  (On my Favorites List for 2004)

Notes: Colm Toibin does not usually name the stories and novels for which Henry James finds inspiration in his own life. The reader who is familiar with James’s novels and stories will immediately recognize the similarities between real events and the plots and characters of the novels that James is shown to be creating. Though the reader who is unfamiliar with James’s work may find the novel to be fascinating without that literary background, his/her pleasure will increase immeasurably if s/he reads some summaries of the novels or views some of the excellent adaptations available on video.

The author’s photo appears with an interview on this South African site:  http://book.co.za

The photo of Henry James is from http://dannarhitect.wordpress.com

Colum McCann–DANCER

Having read and admired Irish author Colum McCann’s earlier novel, This Side of Brightness, a powerfully imagined novel of homeless people and the bleak society they create in the subway tunnels of New York City, I approached this novel initially out of curiosity. McCann’s writing style–very bold, masculine, urgent, and sometimes raw–was the perfect vehicle for that street-smart and inspired novel. I could not imagine an author with such a style succeeding in this novel, a fictionalized account of the life of Rudolf Nureyev and the rarefied world of ballet.

Dancer, however, affected me more profoundly than any other novel I have read in a long time. Vivid and hard-edged, it fuses fact and fiction seamlessly, successfully recreating the essence of a larger-than-life star like Nureyev and illuminating the many secret worlds he inhabited. At the same time, Dancer also manages to capture the heart, making an unlikable egomaniac into an understandable human and his rise to stardom a goal the reader both shares and celebrates.

As a five-year-old, Rudik first found his audience in a hospital in Ufa, where soldiers recuperating from wounds suffered during World War II delighted in his exuberant dancing. A former professional dancer soon became his mentor, and he began practicing every day, finding in the spirit of dance his escape from the hardships of poverty, the mockery of his classmates, and the resistance of his father to his artistic inclinations. His teacher Anna noted from the outset that he was “born within dance, [but] he was unlettered in it. Yet he knew it intimately, it was a grammar for him, deep and untutored.”

His legs were the source of “more violence than grace,” and there was “more intuition in him than intellect, more spirit than knowledge.” In his first brief recital, he was filled with “kinetic fury,” and even when he reached the height of his powers, when much of the world regarded his dance partnership with famed ballerina Margot Fonteyn as both intimate and elegant, his style was also described by others as “ferocious.” Nureyev’s “wild and feral” style of dance meshes perfectly with McCann’s prose. Befitting the athleticism and drive of Nureyev, McCann’s writing is bold and straightforward, characterized by short, powerful, descriptive sentences, often in a simple subject-verb-object pattern. Avoiding all frills and sentimentality, McCann favors strength over lyricism, and power over prettiness.

Through the first person observations of almost two dozen characters who touched Nureyev’s life in some way, McCann shines light on Nureyev’s personality and his development as a dancer. His family, his teachers, his acquaintances, his lovers, his employees, a schoolboy bully, a stilt-walker, and the captain of an airplane, who filed an “incident report” about his atrocious behavior aboard a plane, all comment on his actions and the choices he makes, personally and professionally. The deprivation and sadness experienced by most of these sensitive observers in their own lives contrasts vividly with the excesses and hedonism of Nureyev’s adult life and illuminate, without need for authorial comment, his arrogance and boorishness. At the same time, however, these multiple viewpoints also humanize Nureyev in many ways by showing the extent to which these other characters are connected by love to others and to their history, while Nureyev becomes a “living myth…cared for and coddled and protected by the mythmakers, a life not lived with any reason in mind, just an obeyance to light, or the lack of it…needing constant motion.”

Part III (of four parts) in this novel introduces Victor Pareci, Nureyev’s only real friend, a character with whom Nureyev shares a flambuoyantly gay, often cocaine-enhanced social life and with whom he haunts the baths in New York City. Some readers may find the point of view, the language, and the graphic descriptions offensive, but McCann is presenting this star and his lifestyle as they really were, and he is too direct and uncompromising a writer to pull any punches here. The description of Victor’s ostentatious walk through the neighborhood at the beginning of this section is one of the most intense and fully realized pieces of descriptive writing in the novel, a brilliant interlude and change of focus, which, though vulgar, perhaps, epitomizes Victor’s attitude, complements that of Rudi, and ultimately makes the ending of the novel particularly poignant.

Filled with intriguing characters, ranging from simple Russian peasants to Andy Warhol, Tennessee Williams, John Lennon, Truman Capote, Mick Jagger, Jimi Hendrix, and the stars of ballet, the novel is a monument to the power of the creative spirit and a testament to the dangers inherent in a life from which all other controls have been removed. Rudi always “tore [a] role open, not so much by how he danced, but by the manner in which he presented himself, a sort of hunger turned human.” McCann brings this voracious human to life. Nureyev leaps off these pages in a huge and stunning grand jete.  (The top of my Favorites List for 2003.)

ALSO by McCann: LET THE GREAT WORLD SPIN, WINNER of the IMPAC Dublin Award for 2011,         TRANSATLANTIC,       THIRTEEN WAYS OF LOOKING

Notes: The author’s photo is from http://www.nypress.com/

The photo of Rudik and his mother is from http://nureyev.livejournal.com/

Dancing with Margot Fonteyn, who has been credited with revitalizing his career:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk

A video of Nureyev and Margot Fonteyn in Swan Lake may be seen here:

 

DANCER
Novel. Review. Biographical, Literary, Russia/Soviet Union, United States
Written by: Colum McCann
Published by: Picador Modern Classics
Date Published: 06/02/2015
Edition: Modern Classics Reprint
ISBN: 978-1250051790
Available in: Ebook Paperback Hardcover

 

“The new and prodigious Joseph the Pharoah  [Freud] may be; but the lean and fat kine are anything but plain old cattle!  Be well assured, nonetheless, that I am eager to learn what prodigies of ennui the talking cure will dredge up from the ‘unconscious’ of your devoted friend, Henry James.”– letter from James  to Edith Wharton, regarding Sigmund Freud.

The imagined meeting of Sigmund Freud and Henry James at James’s residence, Lamb House, is the focus of this surprising novel of ideas, which conveys the intellectual ferment in Europe just prior to World War I in a style which is filled with warmth and good humor.  Henry James and Sigmund Freud seem human and even fun-loving here, but the novel is no farce.  Serious issues involving James’s writing, his style, his subjects, and his repressions all come into play, even as Freud admits to having his own problems trying to reconcile James’s creativity with the “scientific knowledge” which forms the basis of his psychoanalytical principles.  Freud’s questions about his research become more acute when James agrees to undergo “short term analysis” during Freud’s stay at Lamb House.

Freud’s visit, arranged by philosopher/psychologist William James, Henry’s brother (who fears that Henry’s increasingly convoluted writing style is a sign of mental illness), is witnessed and recorded by three characters.  Horace Briscoe, a friend of William James’s son Billy, is an American literature student doing his thesis on Henry James.  Living at Lamb House for the summer so he can do research, he keeps a private, objectively written journal of the meetings between Freud and “Uncle

Edwin M Yoder

Edwin M. Yoder

Henry,” as James has asked to be called.  At the same time Henry James is writing almost daily letters to a friend, author Edith Wharton, describing his often amused reactions to Freud’s attempts to discern his “secrets of the alcove,” along with his creation of apocryphal stories for Freud. Freud, in turn, is keeping his own notes on James, which he plans to use for his research.

Each of the “biographers” has personal goals. Horace is excited to be a witness to history, but he is also wildly in love with Agnes Fengallon, the daughter of a conservative preacher, and he and Agnes want to spend as much time as possible discovering the secrets of their own alcoves.  Henry James regards his meeting with Freud as an intellectual contest, and he invents memories for Freud while refusing to give up  information regarding his sexual history or identity.  Freud is attempting to reconcile his own interest in art, as seen in his writings about Michelangelo and Leonardo, with the “scientific” basis of psychoanalysis, which, he believes, may not explain the imagination or creativity.  His questions to James about his novels reflect the Freudian interpretations of these books.

Henry James

Henry James

The body of the novel, set in 1908, alternates with sections written by Horace Briscoe in 1941, by which time James has been dead for twenty-five years, and Briscoe is now a middle-aged professor at Johns Hopkins.  Freud has been dead for two years, and his colleagues and heirs, feeling Freud’s legacy threatened by the beliefs of Jung and Adler, have become “keepers of the flame,” insisting on doctrinaire psychoanalytical interpretations of Freud’s writing.  Briscoe has borrowed Freud’s notes of his 1908 “analysis” of James from the Freud archive, and he fears that these notes will be burned by Freud’s disciples if they show Freud having any doubts about psychoanalysis.  He is determined to protect these notes as historical records.

Sigmund Freud

Sigmund Freud

Beautifully constructed to highlight the issues of the day, the novel is also great fun to read.  Yoder manages to humanize James, an author who remains personally remote for most readers, however much they may admire his work.  Here James is mischievous, a man who delights in trying to outfox Freud.  Telling Freud of his relationship with long-time friend Constance Fenimore Woolson, a woman who died after falling or jumping from a window in Venice, for example, James relates the story of how, after her death, he took her clothing out to sea and threw it into the lagoon, an account that he privately admits is fictional.  He refuses to be drawn into discussions of The Turn of the Screw or elaborate on Isabel Archer’s bad marriage in Portrait of a Lady.

Constance Fenimore Woolson

Constance Fenimore Woolson

Written in a lively style which never becomes ponderous, even when discussing heady literary and philosophical issues, the novel is a delight to read.  While it certainly increases the reader’s pleasure to have a good working knowledge of James’s novels, Yoder writes so clearly that readers less familiar with James will find much to enjoy and even more to admire in this novel. Beautifully paced, with serious themes and intellectual discussions alternating with playful scenes, the novel captures the intellectual face-off of two “lions” who enjoy meeting each other as much as the reader enjoys imagining their meeting.  Though Henry James expected “the talking cure” to dredge up “prodigies of ennui” from his unconscious, he greatly underestimated the prodigious talents of his “biographers,” Horace Briscoe, Sigmund Freud, and, especially, Edwin Yoder.  (My Favorite novel for 2007)

Credits: The author’s photo appears on http://journalism.wlu.edu

The photo of Henry James is from http://danassays.wordpress.com

The photo of Sigmund Freud is from http://blog.syracuse.com

The photo of Constance Fenimore Woolson appears on http://elizabethfoxwell.blogspot.com

Elise Blackwell–GRUB

“Hey, did you hear the one about the writer who died? St. Peter offers him the option of heaven or hell and the writer asks to see each one before deciding.  As they descend into the fires of hell, the writer sees row upon row of writers, all chained to their steaming-hot desks and being whipped by demons.  ‘Show me heaven,’ the writer says.  They ascend to heaven and there’s row upon row of writers chained to steaming-hot desks and being whipped by demons.  ‘But it’s just as bad as hell,’ the writer says.  St. Peter shakes his head, and says, ‘No, because in heaven your work gets published.”–from Grub

Casting a satiric eye on the publishing business, author Elise Blackwell shows the agonies and excitements of several young authors as each tries to find the magic formula for getting a book published, publicized, and sold to the public.  Most have been successful with a first novel—at least to the extent that it has been published—and all now have second novels which they are trying to “place” with a publisher.  Trying to support themselves with contributions to small literary journals while looking for the “right” connection for their next novel, they must negotiate literary minefields filled with agents, editors, publicists, manuscript “fixers,” sponsors of writing conferences, and influential bookstore chains, all of which affect their sense of mission and, ultimately, their self-worth.

Following Jackson Miller, the son of wealthy parents who disowned him when he became a writer, Eddie Renfros and his wife Amanda, and Henry Baffler, all of whom have known each other for years, the novel also includes their lovers and friends—writers all, though some of them write secretly.  As they get together and share their successes and failures, their attitudes toward writing and their craft become obvious.  Jackson, for example, decides on the “commercial” route, stating that “If I had it in me, I’d write the trashiest of trashy novels…I’d sign my name proudly.”  Eventually, he announces, “I’m gearing up to write a vapid book that appears to be smart,” which he describes as “a tale of greed and drugs but mostly sex on Wall St.,” a book tentatively entitled Pig-Male-Ion.

Eddie Renfros wants to be true to his craft.  When his agent informs him that his completed novel may be “too quiet,” Eddie argues that “There’s a plane crash, death, adultery, bribery, surgery on a child’s ear, a world premiere, a drunken cellist, and a beautiful shameless slut of a violin player.”  In the wonderful, darkly humorous scene which follows, the two argue about his prospects for success.  His agent believes she can sell the book, though maybe not to a mass market publisher—”A lot of educated women could want to read it.  If nothing else, they’ll think they’re learning something about classical music.  And the violin slut is good, particularly that one scene.  Heterosexual sodomy is very in…”  She believes that he is a “boutique writer,” whose novel will sell by word of mouth and by hand selling, but “I don’t want your expectations to be too high.  This isn’t an auction project…I know you’re not in it for the money.”

Eddie’s wife Amanda, however, is tired of supporting her husband’s writing.  Upwardly mobile, she absolutely refuses to leave New York for New Jersey to save money.   “If I could choose between literary reputation and contemptible popularity,” she says,  “I think I might take the bestseller.”  Amanda soon begins to write secretly herself—under two names. “Clarice Aames” is the author of popular short stories which quickly find a huge audience in journals and among the writers she and Eddie know, while “Amanda Yule,” her maiden name, is working on a pop novel.  Using the painting of Fragonard as her inspiration, she wants to create a novel “weird enough but not too weird, historical, pretty, and—this was key—full of sexual possibility.”  She instantly determines to entitle it The Progress of Love, to name her heroine Libertine, and to complete the manuscript in four months.

Henry Baffler, a believer in the New Realism, which he has not completely defined, spends his time watching a man in the park, a court bailiff, recording every aspect of his life.  Plotless but “literary,” his newest novel is having a difficult time finding either an agent or a publisher, and he is not even sure he believes in the New Realism anymore.  “If it’s a book you really want to write,” he asks, “does it matter if anyone wants to read it?”

As the reader becomes engaged in following the success or failure of the various characters and the wonderful cast of supporting characters, the author vibrantly (and mordantly) depicts the inherent conflicts between artistic success and commercial success.  Blackwell’s characters are not fully developed, nor should they be, since the author’s intention is to show them primarily as writers–from various backgrounds and with various motivations and personal goals.  Her depiction of their lives shows the dedication and artistic commitment of some, the naivete of others, and the crass commercialism of still others.  Literary journals, writing conferences, and author tours, which involve these authors, also come under the microscope.

Though Blackwell has based this novel on George Gissing’s 1891 novel New Grub Street, her lively prose, contemporary characters, and modern conflicts show how little life has changed for the writer. Delightful, thought-provoking, and full of rapier-sharp insights into the tenuous connections between writing and publishing, the novel is assured, perceptive, and often hilarious. The glimpses Blackwell provides of the strange, literary world she inhabits are unforgettable.  (On my Favorites List for 2007)

Notes: The author’s photo appears on her website:  http://eliseblackwell.com

The cover of New Grub Street by George Gissing is the new Oxford World’s Classics edition, released in April 2009.

“It was soon discovered that every light[house] had a story—not every light was a story, and the flashes themselves were the stories going out over the waves, as markers and guides and comfort and warning.”

Jeanette Winterson’s beautiful and magnificently descriptive, impressionistic novel tells two interconnected stories from two different periods over a hundred years apart, each of them asking who we are as humans, what is our connection to the past, and what makes our lives worth living. On its most modern level, it is the story of Silver, born in 1959, “part precious metal, part pirate.” A young girl without a father, Silver and her mother live in a house perched precariously on the edge of a cliff in northwest Scotland—until her mother, strapped to ten-year-old Silver, one day falls in her climb back to the house, releasing her harness so that Silver, who becomes instantly an orphan, will live.

Taken in by Pew, the aged and blind local lighthousekeeper, whose family has kept the light since 1828, Silver notes that “All the light shone outwards and none of it was there for us. Pew was blind, so it didn’t matter to him. I was lost, so it didn’t matter to me.” Silver polishes the brasswork, makes the tea, and listens to Pew’s stories, some of them historical and some more fanciful, but all of them filled with wisdom and lessons from the past, to which Pew is permanently connected. The lighthouse, we learn through Pew’s stories, was built by Robert Stevenson, father of Robert Louis Stevenson, who “escaped” the family business. In 1878, however, Robert Louis Stevenson visited the light and was fascinated by the story of Babel Dark, a local preacher, who became the inspiration for Mr. Hyde in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and whose story represents the second of the story lines.

Babel Dark, we learn through stories, is a handsome young man who falls in love with red-haired Molly in the early 1850s. When he sees her embracing another man, he is overcome with jealousy and abandons her, marrying another woman instead. He is soon drawn back to Molly, however, symbolically taking the name of Lux (meaning “light”) when he is with her. Like Mr. Hyde, he is unable to control his emotions, and he abuses the women in his life. “He was dark…the light in him never lit. The instruments were in place, and polished too, but the light was not lit.”

As Silver grows up, Pew encourages her to tell her own stories, which she does on her own terms: “A beginning, a middle, and an end is the proper way to tell a story. But I have difficulty with that method.” She has been encouraged to see the continuity of history and of life, as Pew does, and her stories reflect constant growth and change. When the lighthouse is eventually automated, she continues to see life’s continuities with the past, though she is always looking, in the present, for the love that Pew has shown her. Babel Dark, on the other hand, has been a traditional preacher, and sees no continuity with the past, believing instead in separate creation and the idea of man as the highest of God’s creations. When he meets Charles Darwin and then later discovers a cave of fossils in the side of a cliff, he is troubled by the idea that there might have been a “maverick god,” who developed life forms through trial and error, rather than in separate miracles of creation.

As the stories of Silver and Babel Dark develop in parallel, the novel takes on operatic qualities, with the two stories often sounding like duets sung in counterpoint to each other, one voice light and the other dark. As Silver and Dark seek love and fulfillment, the primary human quality which separates man from Darwin’s animals, the cadence of Winterson’s writing rises and falls, swirls, and turns in upon itself, with the same motifs echoing throughout. Winterson creates deliberate parallels when she incorporates the story of Tristan and Isolde, along with a visit from Charles Darwin, into the narrative for emphasis.

Both romantic and philosophical, Winterson offers much unique imagery. The odious Miss Pinch “always spoke like a life insurance policy.” Pew is a “silent, taciturn clamp of a man.” An Albanian family was “vacuum-packed into a ship,” the great-grandmother, “air-dried like a chili pepper, deep red skin and a hot temper; the grandmother, all sun-dried tomato, tough, chewy, skin split with the heat.” Her narrative tempo is flawless, the language elegant, and the characterization as sophisticated as necessary to convey the themes.

Like Silver, who has difficulty telling a story with a beginning, a middle, and an end, Winterson chooses to tell the story on her own terms, juxtaposing scenes from different time periods to show similarities and contrasts between two sets of lives, all of which come together thematically by the end of the book. The conclusion completes a circle by harking back to the beginning, and the reader who goes back to the first few pages will be richly rewarded with greater insights into her meanings. A rich novel which the reader will want to read slowly to savor, Lighthousekeeping marks a welcome return of Winterson to the compressed, poetic style of her earlier novels. (On my Favorites list for 2005)

Notes: The author’s photo is from http://www.dailymail.co.uk

The Tarbatness Lighthouse in northwest Scotland, is the third tallest lighthouse in the country.  It was built by Robert Stevenson, father of Robert Louis Stevenson and is easy to imagine as the place where Silver lived with Pew :  http://www.geograph.org.uk

The photo of Robert Louis Stevenson accompanies a story about how Stevenson got the idea of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hydehttp://www.guardian.co.uk/ No mention is made there about Babel Dark being the inspiration for Mr. Hyde.

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »