Feed on
Posts
Comments

J. G. Farrell–TROUBLES

Note: This novel was the WINNER of the Lost Man Booker Prize for 1970, a year in which the requirements changed and no Booker Prize was awarded.  The Lost Man Booker prize was awarded in May, 2010.

“A situation which defied comprehension, a war without battles or trenches. Why should one bother with the details: the raids for arms, the shootings of policemen, the intimidations? What could one learn from the details of chaos?”

Originally published in 1970 and newly reprinted by The New York Review of Books, J. G. Farrell’s Troubles, the story of Ireland’s fight for its independence from England, from the close of World War I through 1922, illuminates the attitudes and insensitivities that made revolution a necessity for the Irish people. Farrell also, however, focuses on the personal costs to the residential Anglo-Irish aristocracy as they find themselves being driven out of their “homes.”

Life in this novel takes place within the microcosm of a 300-room hotel on the coast of County Wexford run by Edward Spencer, a conservative Protestant loyalist who, regarding himself as a benevolent landowner, demands total submission of his tenants and the signing of a loyalty oath to the King, something they refuse to do. The hotel, lacking maintenance during the war and its aftermath, is now too costly to repair, and it is rapidly becoming a ruin, as the number of British tourists and summer guests dwindles during the early stages of the Irish rebellion, and the number of elderly permanent guests, unable to pay their rent, remains the same. Sinn Fein attacks occur in and around the property, but they are, at first, merely minor inconveniences and annoyances.

Major Brendan Archer, newly released from hospital where he has been recovering from the long-term emotional effects of his wartime experience, arrives at the ironically named Majestic Hotel on a bleak and rainy day to reintroduce himself to his fiancée Angela, daughter of the proprietor, and, if they agree to marry, to return with her to a home in England. The Major, however, is greeted by no one upon his arrival at the hotel desk, and he must find his own way to the Palm Court, “a vast, shadowy cavern in which…beds of oozing mould supported banana and rubber plants, hairy ferns, elephant grass and creepers that dangled from above like emerald intestines.” Despite the claustrophobic and depressing atmosphere, and the lack of an immediate betrothal, the Major remains at the hotel, off and on, for three years, as it begins, literally, to fall around the ears of the inhabitants, and the rebellions and incursions by local farmers and “Shinners” become more ominous.

Ocean View Hotel, Block Island, RI, used as model for this novel.

The Majestic Hotel, with its echoes of His Majesty, is an obvious symbol of British rule in Ireland.  Perched on the coast of southeast Ireland, it faces England and Wales, but the storms, tides, and destructive winds off the Irish Sea have scoured its façade and undermined its structure. Windows are broken, the roof leaks, and decorative gewgaws and balconies hang loosely, threatening to crash.  Roots from the plants have worked their way inside walls, floors, and even ceilings.  The hotel’s ironically named Imperial Bar is “boiling with cats,” some of which live inside upholstered chairs and all of which subsist on a diet of rats and mice. The handful of mostly female tenants who remain at the hotel are aged, clinging to the faded elegance of the Majestic because they have no place else to call home.

The decrepitude of the Majestic offers Farrell unlimited opportunities to indulge his formidable gifts of description and wry humor. Conjuring up images from our own nightmares, he selects small, vivid details to make the larger thematic picture more real. Edward’s introduction of peacocks to the menagerie, the Major’s need to change rooms constantly as he is driven out by the weather or decay, and the eventual takeover of the hotel’s top floor by the cats are homely details which enlarge his canvas and bring his symbolism home to the reader.   When two Irish policemen are killed by Sinn Fein in a distant town, the event has little effect on the inhabitants of the Majestic, and they continue to see themselves as part of the British “moral authority” over the more primitive, uncivilized Irish. But as the reader learns about the earlier Easter Rebellion of 1916 and the number of quick executions by the British administration, along with disturbances at the Peace Day Parade in Dublin, the killing of innocents by Sinn Fein, and, the continued burnings and raids, the danger becomes more immediate and more obvious.

Injecting small news stories throughout the narrative, Farrell sets up global parallels to the rebellion in Ireland, widening his scope by illuminating that time in postwar British history when virtually all the colonies of the empire were simultaneously agitating for independence. Newspaper stories about the British army’s firing on the populace in Amritsar, the laying down of arms by the Connaught Rangers in India in sympathy with the Irish people and a “native” uprising in South Africa, give wider scope to the Irish rebellion and its attendant violence. When Edward and the  Major finally begin to shoot the Majestic’s cats, the reader is prepared for a final round of violence at the Majestic.

Though Farrell won the Booker Prize in 1973 for The Siege of Krishnapur, Troubles may be his best-known and most memorable novel, and this new reprinting will make it accessible to a new readership previously unfamiliar with his work. Few readers will be able to forget the humor (and even satire) that is injected here at some of the most emotional moments. Clearly delineating the emotional issues behind the drive for Irish independence, he makes the reader see both sides with empathy. From the outset we know, however, that Farrell believes that independence from British rule is both necessary and inescapable. As violence comes to the Majestic, we see that Farrell has prepared us to recognize that violence is random, its events “inevitable, without malice, part of history.”

Notes: The photo of  the author appears on http://www.theindiaphile.com

The Cork University Press (http://corkuniversitypress.typepad.com) suggests from letters written by Farrell that the inspiration for the Majestic was the ruin of the Ocean View Hotel on Block Island, Rhode Island, in the US.  (The photos on the Cork University site are not correct, however, showing [first] Woonsocket House, a small guest house on the Massachusetts border, and not on Block Island, Rhode Island, and (second) the Ocean View Hotel on Pablo Beach, Florida, near Jacksonville, neither of which is appropriate.)

The Ocean View Hotel on Block Island, Rhode Island, actually had 500 rooms in 1902:  see this PDF file by scrolling down on the link that opens:  http://query.nytimes.com

A view of the actual Ocean View Hotel with sailboat is available as framed art print here:  http://www.allposters.com

Parts of the interior of this hotel may have resembled the photos from the decrepit Grande Hotel in Mozambique, once a showpiece.

Also reviewed here:  THE SINGAPORE GRIP and      THE SIEGE OF KRISHNAPUR

“There were no words at all for the enormous charity that having a woman, in a room with a closed door, in a bed that was one’s own, meant.  He touched her with a quality of wonder and thankfulness.  She said nothing.  She did not move.  But it was not necessary for her to say anything or even to give him anything.  It was just the tremendousness of her being there.  And he could not tell her that.”

The liberation of Rome during World War II was not a “liberation” to many of its inhabitants after the occupying American and British armies took up residence.  The initial joy at the Germans’ departure had faded, six months later, as many Italians began to resent what they regarded as the occupiers’ sense of entitlement and superiority.  Perfectly capturing the atmosphere and changing moods of the times, author Alfred Hayes creates a microcosm of Roman life in the home of the Pulcini family on the Via Flaminia.  Adele, the mother, needing funds and food, uses her dining room as a small café for a handful of American and British soldiers in the evening, and, if they need “company,” she arranges for them to meet Italian women.

When one of the residents of the Pulcinis’ house departs, the Pulcinis’ maid arranges for her friend Lisa Costa, from Genoa, to move into the room.  Lisa, a “nice girl” is desperate.  Out of food, out of money, and with no job prospects in Genoa, she has agreed to pose as the wife of an American soldier at the Pulcinis’ house in exchange for food and shelter.  Robert Guard, her “husband,” is a lonely, young American who wants company, someone to talk to, and even, perhaps, to take to bed, but he especially wants a sense of “home,” and he hopes Lisa will provide these.

The pas de deux between Robert and Lisa is beautifully rendered, as author Alfred Hayes shows their awkward relationship and Robert’s clumsy attempts to establish some sort of communication with Lisa.  Lisa resents having to live with Robert, whom she regards as a “barbarian conqueror,” while he fails to understand that she has her own needs which go beyond food and shelter.  He is not self-aware enough to know what he is doing wrong, though he never forces her to act as a prostitute.  The first sign that he may connect with her occurs in one beautifully sensitive and subtle scene, in which he woos her with a package of instant soup and some of his mother’s Christmas cake.

Against this backdrop of failed connections looms Antonio, the Pulcinis’ son.  Once a soldier in the Italian army, he has deserted after watching the death of his best friend and after suffering his own terrible wound during their retreat from southern Italy.  For two months, until the “liberation,” his parents hid him in their dark cellar, and his isolation, his guilt at having deserted, his pain from his wounds, and his frustrated patriotism and resentment against the “liberating” armies from the west have left him unstable.  Proud and unwilling to accept defeat, he sees himself as a man who must constantly embody the glories of Italy and its culture, and he regards it as his mission to reprimand and punish his fellow Italians who may have “forgotten” their heritage in the traumatic aftermath of the war.

Iconic photo from wwiiarchives.net

Written in 1949 by Alfred Hayes, one of the premier writers of the period, The Girl on the Via Flaminia (recently reprinted by Europa Editions) shows Hayes’s experience as an honored and respected screenwriter.  This sensitive and gorgeously wrought study of connections and misconnections contains dialogue that one can only hope will one day be transformed for the stage or screen.  As much a drama as it is a novel with intense scenes, this masterpiece of the period perfectly captures a short, but unique, period in history—the months in which Rome was “liberated” and then occupied by western armies—a period which deserves revisiting, either in the form of this novel or as a play or film.

The themes of occupier vs. occupied, military “conquerors” vs. prideful populations who do not regard themselves as “conquered,” and individuals caught up in personal crises within a governing structure over which they have no control are as universal and a propos today as they were almost sixty years ago.  Hayes, a brilliant creator of scenes who deserves a much wider appreciation than he currently enjoys, gives each of the main characters his/her own point of view in various sections of the novel, enhancing the reader’s understanding of the conflicts which brew beneath the surface of this character-driven novel.  And when the climax occurs at the end, the characters have been so carefully drawn and the symbolism has been presented so clearly that no careful reader will be surprised by the outcome.  The novel is short, but it radiates with life.

ALSO by Alfred Hayes:  MY FACE FOR THE WORLD TO SEE IN LOVE,    THE END OF ME

Photos, in order: The author’s photo appears on http://www.art.com/

 

The photo of the liberation of Rome in June, 1944, appears on http://www.wwiiarchives.net


“The age of glorious wars ended with the Meiji era…There isn’t much chance to die now on the battlefield.  But now that old wars are finished, a new kind of war has just begun; this is the era for the war of emotion…And just as in the old wars, there will be casualties in the war of emotion, I think.  It’s the fate of our age.”—Shigekuni Honda, Kiyoake’s best friend

Just after author Yukio Mishima finished the final novel in his “Sea of Fertility” tetralogy on November 25, 1970, he disemboweled himself in a ritual suicide—seppuku—committed in the presence of four members of his private army.  He was then beheaded, in accordance with ritual.   Mishima, aged forty-five, believed whole-heartedly in the strengths of the old Japanese emperors and in the strong, aristocratic culture that had evolved from the samurai.  He never forgave Emperor Hirohito for denying his godliness at the end of World War II, and he despaired of the political wrong-headedness he saw on both the right and the left a generation after the war.  Spring Snow, written in 1966, is the first of the four novels of what is generally regarded as his masterpiece, a series which explores the essence of life, the spiritual beliefs which make that life meaningful, the obligations of man to a wider society, the relationship of chance to free will, and the glory of dying for one’s beliefs.  By using a historical approach, with each of these novels taking place later than the previous one, and by repeating his characters, Mishima allows the reader to see Japanese cultural and social history change over a fifty-year period.

Spring Snow begins in 1912.  The Meiji dynasty has ended, and Emperor Yoshihito has begun the Taisho dynasty.  Kiyoake Matsugae is then a schoolboy at the exclusive, but rigidly spartan, Peers School, the former headmaster of which committed seppuko, establishing a much-admired legacy there.  Kiyoake’s father, the wealthy son of a samurai family which was heroic during the Russo-Japanese War, wanted his son to be able to serve at the highest levels of the Imperial Court, and he gave away Kiyoake when he was a small child so he could be raised by the family of a court nobleman.  Count Ayakura, his guardian, had royal connections but less wealth than Matsugae.  By age fifteen, Kiyoake has learned court manners and traditions and associated with the children of the aristocracy, and appears to be ready to make his mark within the court.  Kiyoake, however, hates the militant atmosphere of his school and prefers a more artistic, emotional life.   He records his dreams on a regular basis and seems out of touch with absolute values.

The Great Buddha of Kamakura, seen by Kiyoake and his friends

Satoko Ayakura, two years older, is the daughter of Count Ayakura, and when Kiyoake begins to have romantic feelings for her, he is caught in the philosophical no-man’s-land between the harshly rigid values of his school (and much of his culture) and his own feelings of need for warmth and communication.  Though she also seems to be attracted to him, he, a product of the cultural values of the time, refuses to admit that he needs anyone or anything to be a man, and he alternately encourages and rejects a relationship.  When she, at age twenty (already “past her prime”  for marriage), indicates her strong attraction to him, he withdraws, and any hope of a long-term relationship apparently vanishes.

The novel uses this relationship to illustrate Mishima’s themes of change.  Though Satoko, as a woman, has virtually no importance at all in the overall scheme of things, the reader cannot help but identify with her and her love for Kiyoake.  At eighteen, he is so conflicted and so much a product of his upbringing that many, if not most, contemporary western readers will despair of his ever achieving any enlightenment at all.  The reactions of his friend Shigekuni Honda, a fellow-student, and of Iinuma, his personal tutor, both of whom are repeating characters in the tetralogy, keep the conflicts in focus and, through their different responses to the love story, guide the reader to an understanding of where the author is going with this novel as part of the tetralogy.  Mishima’s several forays into philosophical analysis, in the course of the novel, provide wider perspective into his own attitudes toward life, love, and death.

The Shinbashi Railroad Station

Mishima, in the course of the novel, describes in great detail the houses, clothing, rituals, and even hairstyles of the period, and the density of the elaborate descriptions adds to the grand, epic sweep. The need for a character’s real feelings to be hidden, as the required patterns for communication are observed, is both frustrating and enlightening, and his use of symbols from nature—a dead dog at the top of a waterfall; a dead, blind mole; and Kiyoake’s fear of turtles—add to the atmosphere and the novel’s meanings.  Some readers may not fully appreciate the sections of philosophizing, which do sometimes feel intrusive and not quite integrated, but these sections do counteract the unfolding romance and melodrama which might otherwise overwhelm the narrative.  Despite Mishima’s world-wide reputation and the notoriety he achieved as a result of his bizarre ritual suicide, his writing is not esoteric.  Instead, he writes in an accessible, descriptive style which graphically conveys the culture of Japan a generation before World War II.

ALSO  by Mishima:   THE FROLIC OF THE BEASTS,      RUNAWAY HORSES (#2),     THE TEMPLE OF DAWN (#3),       STAR,      LIFE FOR SALE

Photos, in order: The photo of the author is from http://faculty.washington.edu.

The Great Buddha of Kamakura, seen by Kiyoake and his friends during one summer vacation, is here: www.travel-destination-pictures.com.

The early twentieth century photo of Shimabashi Station (from which Satoko, her parents, and Kiyoake’s parents depart for Osaka) appears on http://en.wikipedia.org.

E. M. Forster–HOWARDS END

“Connect the prose and the passion…both will be exalted.”

In this 1910 story of Edwardian England, Forster illustrates the conflicts between the superior attitudes of the aristocracy and a developing feeling of obligation toward the “lower” classes which World War I will soon bring into sharp relief. Margaret and Helen Schlegel are intellectual and sensitive to the arts, with compassionate hearts for those less fortunate.

When Margaret, at age twenty-nine, is affianced to Henry Wilcox, the much older, widowed husband of a friend, this conflict of attitudes is brought to the fore. Henry, insensitive and believing himself actually entitled to his family’s privileges, is cold and reserved, though Margaret believes that “Henry must be forgiven and made better by love.”

Helen, her sister, a 21-year-old with an enthusiasm for the life of the imagination, has no sympathy for Henry’s failure to pay attention to the people “below him” who are dependent upon his whims. Eventually, a casual remark by Henry leads to the loss of a job for Leonard Bast, a penniless young clerk, but Henry refuses to accept any responsibility whatsoever and refuses his wife’s entreaties to give the destitute Leonard a job.

Immensely sympathetic to the economic position of the poor and women, Forster illustrates their financial dependence on others. Margaret, who secures the reader’s total sympathy, is charged with educating a close-minded dolt like Henry to be kinder and more empathetic towards the people he considers below him, but she achieves only limited success.

Filled with incisive observations and great wit, the novel follows the narrative pattern of a melodrama, but Forster’s sensitivity to both sides–the practical and conservative values of Henry vs. the emotional and idealistic sides of Margaret and Helen–elevates the novel above the tawdry. Henry is a product of his time and his class, but though times are changing, he is too dense to realize it. The Wilcox home at Howard’s End is a microcosm, and its conflicts are those of the nation at that time. Thoughtful and entertaining, Howard’s End still draws in readers after almost a hundred years.

Notes: The DVD of this novel stars Anthony Hopkins, Emma Thompson, and Vanessa Redgrave.

Greene’s most hilarious and most mordant entertainment.

Gleefully combining the raucous humor of absurdity with slyly subtle wordplay and caustic satire, Greene entertains on every level, poking fun at British intelligence-gathering services during the Cold War. Setting the novel in the flamboyant atmosphere of pre-revolutionary Havana, where virtually anything can be had at a price, Greene establishes his contrasts and ironies early, creating a hilarious set piece which satirizes both the British government’s never-satisfied desire for secrets about foreign political movements and their belief that the most banal of activities constitute threats to national security.

Ex-patriot James Wormold is a mild-mannered, marginal businessman and vacuum cleaner salesman, whose spoiled teenage daughter sees herself as part of the equestrian and country club set. Approached by MI6 in a public restroom, Wormold finds himself unwillingly recruited to be “our man in Havana,” a role which will reward him handsomely for information and allow him some much-needed financial breathing room.

Encouraged to recruit other agents to provide more information (and earn even more money), he chooses names at random from the country club membership list and fabricates personas for them, featuring them in fictionalized little dramas which he churns out and forwards to his “handlers.” Always careful to fulfill their expectations exactly, Wormold becomes a more and more important “spy,” his stories become more creative, his “enemies” find him and his “agents” to be dangerous, and his friends and the real people whose names were used as fictional agents begin to turn up dead.

Skewering British intelligence for being such willing dupes of a vacuum cleaner salesman who never wanted to be an agent in the first place, Greene betrays both his familiarity with the inner workings of the intelligence service, of which he was once a member, and his rejection of Cold War politics. In a conclusion which will satisfy everyone who has ever become impatient with political maneuvering, Greene carries the absurdities of power to their limits, orchestrating a grand finale which shows British politicians at their most venal–and most ridiculous. Acerbic in its humor and delightfully refreshing in its choice of “hero,” this novel is Greene at his very best.

Notes: The film version of this novel stars Alec Guiness, Maureen O’Hara, and Burl Ives.

Also reviewed here: THE THIRD MAN and  THE POWER AND THE GLORY

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »