Feed on
Posts
Comments

“I love hell. I can’t wait to get back there.”

Geoffrey Firmin, the former British consul to Mexico, is a prisoner of alcoholism. A victim of the shakes, he hears voices, talks to people who are not there, and hallucinates, though he is often able to hide the extent of his drinking. “True, he might lie down in the street, but he would never reel.” On The Day of the Dead in 1938, his recently divorced wife Yvonne returns to Quauhnahuac, over which two smoking volcanoes loom, to try to persuade him to reconcile.

Coincidentally, Geoffrey’s half-brother Hugh, with whom Yvonne apparently had a brief affair, also arrives that day, and the three share quarters, each hoping to recapture the past. When they take the bus to Tomalin to a bull-riding event, they see a wounded peasant dying beside the road, the peasant’s horse with the number 7 branded on its rump, a tricky pesado, and a group of vigilantes, all of whom play a role in the climax which follows.

Rich with details, both of the external world of Quauhnahuac and the internal world of Geoffrey, the novel, first published in 1947, reflects Lowry’s own experiences as an alcoholic. Geoffrey, a fully-rounded character, knows that he must stop drinking in order to function effectively, but he is unable to function at all without drinking. He both loves and despises Yvonne, wants to leave Mexico but wants to stay, and wants to find peace but creates chaos.

As Lowry reconstructs this one day in Geoffrey’s life, the Day of the Dead, the pervasive symbolism adds to the feeling of overpowering doom–the smoking volcanoes ready to erupt, the “hideous pariah dog” that follows Geoffrey and Yvonne to the house, a barranca (chasm) which exists beside the house and which contains a dead dog, an Indian carrying “the weight of the past,” vultures in the forest, Yvonne’s release of an eagle in a cage, and sudden storms. All add weight and intensity to this powerful story of dissolution.

Despite the depressing subject matter and a frustrating main character who cannot or will not help himself during the novel’s four hundred pages, the novel is breath-taking–elegant both in language and construction. Carefully plotted, filled with unique imagery, and enhanced by symbolism which brings it alive on new levels, it overwhelms the reader with its impact and approaches classical tragedy as the inevitable, doom-filled events play out. Though the novel includes peripheral political issues of the day–Mexico’s instability and the philosophical conflicts between fascism and socialism–it is primarily a variation on the story of the Garden of Eden and the fall of man–full, rich, dense, and rewarding, despite its pervasive sadness.

Notes: The author’s photo  from 1947 appeared in the New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com

Popocatepetl, the lively volcano closest to Cuernavaca, the model for Quauhnahuac, has been active since 1994, having been dormant for fifty years prior to that.  http://explorevolcanoesnow.com

“I believe in writing because the power of writing is greater than that of fate or time. The things we do, the things we desire, the things we love, the things we say, all pass away. Women pass, affairs pass. Time’s dust settles over all we have done, over everything that once excited us. But words remain.”

Escaping in 1756, after sixteen months in a Venice jail, Giacomo Casanova, “all seven deadly sins in one accursed body,” arrives in Bolzano, where the Doge and the Inquisition cannot reach him. Seeing himself as “that rare creature, a writer with a life to write about,” he and a defrocked priest, Balbi, move into a hotel, not far from where the Duke of Parma and his young bride Francesca reside. Casanova was wounded by the duke in a duel over Francesca three years before and has promised never to see her again. When the Duke arrives at Casanova’s hotel with a letter from Francesca, asking to see him, the stage is set for the action and a surprising ending.

Originally published in Hungary in 1940, this is the second of Hungarian author Sandor Márai’s “lost masterpieces” to be “discovered” and published recently in English, and it bears some structural similarities to Embers, his previous novel. Like Embers, the action takes place largely in one room, where an assertive narrator comments on his life, his rationalizations for his actions, his beliefs, and his future. Observant of even the smallest details about people, the author is far more romantic in his descriptions here, as perhaps befits a novel about Casanova, piling up detail upon detail in a narrative which sounds, in places, almost like the grand chorus of an opera (with one incredible sentence consisting of over three hundred words).

As the author catalogues the response of the citizenry of Europe to news of Cazanova’s escape, the glories and cruelties of Venice, the enthusiastic reaction of the citizens of Bolzano to the “surgeries” Casanova holds each afternoon to discuss love, and the details of Casanova’s life, he sets the scene for the action which takes place in the second half of the novel. The arrival of the Duke of Parma in Casanova’s hotel room with Francesca’s letter, his “deconstruction” of the letter, and the solution the duke proposes to Casanova set up a morality tale in which Casanova must evaluate his life, his feelings for Francesca, and his definition of love.

Delightful to read and often witty, the novel raises thoughtful questions about love and responsibility, but in its details it is not so fully integrated as Embers. The story seems overloaded with heavy descriptions in the first half, lacking the action and, more importantly, the characters’ interactions which make the second half so enjoyable and the ironies of the ending so memorable.

Also reviewed here:  EMBERS

ESTHER’S INHERITANCE

Sandor Marai–EMBERS

“We have to endure our characters. . .as best we can.”

As full of dramatic tension as anything written by Poe, this masterpiece of character development idealizes the personal values of a lost world, and celebrates the rewards and obligations of friendship.

Henrik, a former Austro-Hungarian general and member of the aristocracy, is approaching the end of his life, having lived 75 years according to the “male virtues: silence, solitude, and the inviolability of one’s word.” He is awaiting a visit from Konrad, his former best friend, a man he has not seen or heard from in “41 years and 43 days,” a man he believes betrayed him and upon whom he has yearned for revenge for more than half his life.

The simple narrative framework allows Henrik to tell the story through his own meditations and his one-sided conversation with Konrad after his arrival. Touching first on the lives and marriages of Henrik’s parents, his wife’s parents, and then Konrad’s parents, Henrik slides obliquely and seductively into the story of his friendship with Konrad, his courtship of Krisztina, and the first four years of his own marriage.

As tiny details emerge and build upon one another, the dramatic irony grows. Henrik’s vision of himself, his motivations, and his actions appear in sharp relief against the conclusions being drawn by the reader. Henrik is, above all, an aristocrat, imprisoned by a value system he also embraces.

As the parallel dilemmas he imposes on his wife and Konrad emerge ironically from Henrik’s narrative, the reader is simultaneously fascinated and frustrated by Henrik’s view of his own dilemma and his desire for Truth. A heart-stopping climax and Konrad’s dramatic reply to his interrogation, along with numerous breath-taking descriptions of nature, leave the reader awed by Marai’s talent and grateful that this very clever and sensitive study of character and values has been reclaimed for posterity.

Also reviewed here:    ESTHER’S INHERITANCE and CASANOVA IN BOLZANO

“My experience of Lajos is that he is the kind of man who begins with lies but then in the middle of his lying grows passionate and weeps, going on to lie more, this time with tears in his eyes, until eventually, to everyone’s utter surprise, he tells the truth as eloquently as he had been telling the opposite.”

Full of the kind of dramatic tension and intimacy usually associated with great stage plays, Hungarian author Sandor Marai’s newest novel to be translated into English plumbs the depths of a love thwarted and then revisited years later. Twenty-three years before the book opens, sensible Esther, now in her mid-forties, shared a once-in-a-lifetime passion with Lajos, a man who bewitched everyone who came into contact with him—her brother, her family, and her friends—a man so full of energy—and lies—that life became a dangerous, exciting adventure for everyone around him. As persuasive as he was charming, he lived the good life, often “borrowing” valuable items or money from friends, and they, just as often, excusing him, wanting to believe that he would eventually return or replace what he borrowed (or not caring enough to challenge him).

Esther, believing it important for the family history, has now decided to record every detail of her earlier relationship with Lajos. Moving back and forth in time, Esther creates a vivid picture of Lajos and the magical, mysterious hold he exerted on everyone, concentrating on his hold over her and her ability to resist (or not resist) his versions of the “truth.” When he first proposed to the vulnerable Esther, then twenty-two, she says she recognized him for the charming scoundrel he really was, but she also looked forward to a future with him. What she did not expect, however, was that within weeks he would marry her younger sister and that they would leave town forever. Now, twenty years later, following Vilma’s death, Lajos has returned to the village accompanied by his two children, a middle-aged woman, and her son, wanting to talk with Esther. Their dramatic confrontation and shared memories are the crux of the novel.

As Esther recalls that tension-filled meeting, the reader gradually sees that Esther is not a reliable narrator—nor is Lajos. Because they have never discussed, until now, the circumstances which led to Lajos’s marriage to Vilma, neither Esther nor Lajos knows the whole story, and as long-ago details emerge, the tension within Esther (and the reader) becomes almost palpable. Lajos, we discover, has been even more devious than anyone has suspected, but as he also begins to draw the reader into his orbit, the reader discovers that Lajos may be the one person who comes closest to real self-knowledge. The heart-stopping conclusion leaves the reader in awe of Marai’s ability to use dramatic irony to its fullest effect.

A master craftsman who compresses his novels to the point that every word, image, and detail adds to the atmosphere and developing suspense, Marai has only recently received the world-wide acclaim that he deserves. Writing in Hungary in the 1930s, he opposed the fascists and the Nazis, eventually being forced to leave the country in 1948, when his opposition to the Communist takeover made him an enemy of the government. His books were banned, and many were thought lost forever. In 2000, eleven years after Marai’s death, Embers, long thought to have been lost, was found in Italy, translated, and published in English. Casanova in Bolzano followed in 2004, The Rebels in 2007 and Esther’s Inheritance, originally written in 1938, has been the latest to translated and released.

These novels, all short, follow a common structure, usually involving a confrontation between two realistic and well-developed characters, each of whom comes away from the meeting forever changed. As they discuss love, their long-term conflicts, and their beliefs about what constitutes a good life, they become more self-aware and grow closer to the “truth.” With universal themes and characters who reflect universal human failings, Marai’s novels offer a fresh look at the age-old struggle to make sense of a confusing and conflicted world. (Translated by George Szirtes)

Notes:  Also reviewed here:  CASANOVA IN BOLZANO and  

EMBERS

“You are an unmitigated cad!”

When he first meets Charles Strickland, a London stockbroker, the young narrator of this novel thinks of him as “good, honest, dull, and plain.” When Strickland suddenly abandons his wife and children and takes off for Paris, however, the narrator decides he is a cad. Though he has had no training, Strickland has decided to become an artist, a drive so strong that he is willing to sacrifice everything toward that end. Anti-social, and feeling no obligation to observe even the smallest social decencies, Strickland becomes increasingly boorish as he practices his art. Eventually, he makes his way to Tahiti, where he “marries,” moves to a remote cottage, and spends the rest of his life devoted to his painting.

Somerset Maugham

Basing the novel loosely on the life of Paul Gauguin, Maugham creates an involving and often exciting story. His narrator is a writer who feels impelled, after Strickland’s death and posthumous success, to set down his memories of his early interactions with Strickland in London and Paris. Because the narrator never saw Strickland after he left Paris, he depends on his meetings with a ship captain and a woman in Papeete for information about Strickland after Strickland’s arrival in Tahiti.  The ship captain is described as a story-teller who may be spinning tall tales, a constant reminder to the reader that this is fiction, and not a biography of Gauguin.

Paul Gauguin, self-portrait

By depicting Strickland as a “dull, plain” man suddenly gripped by an obsession so overwhelming that nothing else matters to him, Maugham involves the reader in his actions, which even the narrator claims not to understand. The least convincing aspect of Strickland’s characterization is the narrator’s observation that Strickland is completely indifferent to his wife of seventeen years and his children. No confrontation between Strickland and his wife appears, and one wonders if perhaps Maugham found himself unable to depict such an abandonment realistically. The story moves quickly, however, and whatever is sacrificed in the characterization is more than recouped in the plot and its development.

Straightforward in its story line, the novel is romantic in its depiction of the artist in the grip of an obsession, his subsequent abandonment of civilization and return to nature, his suffering of a long and terminal illness (during which he paints his masterpiece), and the fate of this creation. Good, old-fashioned story-telling at its best, this uncomplicated story, written in 1919, still has broad appeal.

THE MOON AND SIXPENCE
Review. Fictionalized Biography, French Polynesia, Literary, Impressionism, Paul Gauguin
Written by: W. Somerset Maugham
Published by: Barnes and Noble
Edition: Library of Essential Reading
ISBN: 978-0760793541
Available in: Paperback

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »