Feed on
Posts
Comments

“Is there any test of genius but success?”

Published in 1905, The House of Mirth offers a blistering social commentary on the lifestyles and behavior of super-rich American society. Having grown up in this society, author Edith Wharton evaluates it here as an insider, and her trenchant observations give this early novel a liveliness and verisimilitude not characteristic of “aristocratic” novels written by outsiders. Set at a time in which the old, moneyed aristocracy was being forced to admit newcomers who had made their recent fortunes through industry, the novel shows moneyed society in flux, the old guard ensuring their exclusivity against parvenus who are not the “right type,” at the same time that their sons and daughters were often securing large fortunes through marriage into some of these new families.

Lily Bart, a beautiful young woman of good family whose father lost everything when she was only nineteen, is left dependent on wealthy relatives in this society until she can charm a financially secure suitor into marriage. At age twenty-nine, she is no longer a debutante, and the pressure is mounting for her to marry, though she lacks the unlimited financial resources of social rivals. Still, her wit and charm make her a delightful companion, and she is never at a loss for suitors. Intelligent enough to want a real marriage and not just a merger between families, she has resisted making a commitment to date, though the clock is ticking.

As Lily tries to negotiate a good marriage and future for herself, she is aware that the competition is fierce. Women “friends” pounce on the latest gossip and spread rumors to discredit rivals, and Lily’s reputation is tainted with hints of impropriety. Her opportunities for a good marriage begin to dwindle.  Complications always arise for Lily, and they continue here in this melodrama.

Author Edith Wharton creates a complete picture of turn-of-the-century New York society and its “important” people – their lack of morality, their opportunism, their manipulations, and their smug self-importance, characteristics one may also see in Lily when she is part of this society. But Wharton also shows how quickly a woman may become an outcast when the money runs out and she is thrown on her own resources without any training for any other kind of life. A well-developed melodrama filled with revealing details, this novel established Wharton’s reputation as a novelist/commentator on the manners and morals of high society and those who would participate in it.

Notes: The author’s photo is from http://www.wsu.edu/~campbelld/wharton/bio.htm

Also reviewed here: SUMMER,      GLIMPSES OF THE MOON,      AGE OF INNOCENCE

[schema type=”book” url=”https://marywhipplereviews.com/edith-wharton-the-house-of-mirth-2008/” name=”HOUSE OF MIRTH” description=”REVIEW. Classic Novel, Literary, US Regional” author=”EDITH WHARTON” publisher=”Wharton Press (November 13, 2013)” pubdate=”2013-11-13″ edition=”Reprint edition” isbn=” 978-1619493889″ paperback=”yes” ]

Edith Wharton–SUMMER

“[The mountain] is where I was born…where I belong.”

Written in 1917, Summer is Wharton’s most explicitly sexual novel, tracing the awakening of Charity Royall to the sweetness of love and its power. Charity was born on “the mountain,” a place of poverty and degradation, and given over to be brought up by Lawyer Royall and his wife, residents of the town of North Dormer. When his wife dies, Lawyer Royall is hard pressed to deal with this child, choosing to ignore her most of the time, and bringing her up with little feeling, warmth, or affection.

Anxious to have some independence so that she can escape, at some point, from the closed society of the village, Charity becomes the town librarian, a part-time job which gives her a small amount of her own money. There she encounters Lucius Harney, the nephew of one of the town’s leading citizens, an architect studying some of the old houses in the area. His interest in Charity soon develops into affection and then passion, and the two become lovers, a relationship which quickly develops complications. Charity, with few options in life, is starved for affection and yearns to escape the village, while Harney, educated but personally weak, can already come and go as he pleases.

Wharton uses the seasons symbolically to illustrate the development of the relationship between Charity Royall and Lucius Harney from the earliest stirrings of their interest when they meet in early June to the full passion of their love in mid-August. Fall brings reality to Charity, and winter freezes her soul. Throughout the novel references are made to the mountain where Charity was born and to the ignorant people who live there without hope of improving their lives. Charity’s own return to visit her family shows her the desperation of their lives, and her need to grasp whatever escape route is available to her.

Wharton’s bold depiction of sexual themes makes this novel unusual for its period. She depicts a young woman who has a fierce desire for independence but who has few opportunities to escape her environment, a young woman who latches onto a relationship which broadens her world. She minces no words in showing scenes in which sexual abuse rears its ugly head, and she is realistic in the options she gives for “fallen” women like Charity to deal with the complications of their lives in the “fall” of the relationship. Though the beginning of the novel may seem sentimental or melodramatic, Wharton has a clear vision of the limited possibilities open to young women of the day, and her conclusion emphasizes this.

Notes: The author’s photo appears on http://theboweryboys.blogspot.com

Also reviewed here:  THE HOUSE OF MIRTH,     GLIMPSES OF THE MOON, and   AGE OF INNOCENCE

SUMMER
REVIEW. Classic Novel, Coming-of-age, Literary, US Regional
Written by: Edith Warton
Published by: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
Date Published: 10/12/2011
Edition: Reprint edition.
ISBN: 978-1453734803
Available in: Ebook Paperback

“The rarest bird ever recorded…Seen only once, in 1774, by Captain Cook’s second expedition.  A routine collecting party on a South Sea island known then as Ulieta.  A single specimen captured, of a species never seen before.  Preserved by Johann Forster and brought back to England.  No bird like it ever found again, on Ulieta or anywhere else.  Extinct before it was ever really discovered.”

Combining natural history, a search for the remains of the Mysterious Bird of Ulieta, several love stories, and a number of exciting mysteries, author Martin Davies keeps the reader totally engaged and on the edge of his/her seat for the entire length of the novel.  As the novel opens, famed researcher of extinct birds John Fitzgerald is visited by Gabriela, a former lover from Brazil whom he has not seen for 14 years.  She is now in London with Karl Anderson, an aggressive researcher/natural scientist, who is actively searching for the Mysterious Bird of Ulieta, and Gabriela wants Fitzgerald to help.  Anderson believes that if he can locate the remains of this mysterious bird for the Ark Project, a project to collect rare DNA, that it will not only boost the value of the shares but will also attract much needed publicity.  Hoping to lure John Fitzgerald into helping him find the bird, Anderson offers him $50,000, an offer he refuses.  Fitzgerald has decided to search for the bird himself, eventually aided by Katya, a young graduate student renting a room in his house.

The attempt to locate the bird and information about it draws the reader into the story of Sir Joseph Banks, who was the lead naturalist on Captain Cook’s first voyage in 1768. Scheduled to hold the same position on the second voyage in 1772, Banks decided at the last minute not to go, claiming that there was not enough space on the ship for him and his entourage.  Cook’s second voyage took place without him, with Johann Forster as naturalist and his son Georg as artist/assistant.  It was on this second voyage that the Mysterious Bird of Ulieta was found.  Forster mounted it and his son Georg, an artist, painted a watercolor of it, now in the collection of the Royal Society.  Upon his return to England, Forster gave this bird to Joseph Banks who displayed it for four years, until it suddenly and inexplicably vanished from his collection, with no trace of it ever found again.

The second expedition was notable for another event, however.  When the ship stopped in Madeira, a “Mr.  Burnett” was waiting to join the ship as part of Banks’s party.  Hearing that Banks had decided against the trip, Mr. Burnett departed hastily for England on the next ship, but Capt. Cook found “his” behavior so odd that he noted in a letter to the Admiralty that “Every part of Mr. Burnett’s behaviour and every action tended to prove that he was a Woman.”  The “Mr. Burnett” story combines with the biography of Joseph Banks, creating a dramatic, often moving love story as John Fitzgerald, investigating, thinks “Burnett” may be the key to finding the remains of the bird of Ulieta.

A third story line tells the story of John Fitzgerald’s obsessed grandfather, who travels to the Congo, determined to find an African peacock on the strength of having seen one single feather.

Davies, a BBC producer, knows how to organize and pace a story, even one as intricate as this one, providing numerous surprises throughout and a conclusion worthy of the best mystery writers.  With an exceptionally efficient prose style, he writes clearly and keeps the several plot lines from becoming confused, his vocabulary and syntax kept simple.  The story moves along smartly as the competition to discover what happened to this bird becomes more intense.  Occasionally, there is some awkwardness in transitions between sections (e.g., “And that was what got me thinking about grandfather.”) and even an anachronism (e.g., Sir Joseph Banks referring to a “random act of kindness.”), but these are small complaints in a book that manages to tell such a fascinating story, chock full of non-stop action, mystery, and romance.

Notes: The author’s photo by Jerry Bauer appears on his author page on Hodder and Stoughton:  http://www.hodder.co.uk

An article about the mysterious bird of Ulieta is connected here with George Foster’s painting of the “conjurer’s bird.”  This painting is being protected by the Museum of Natural history at Tring: http://www.nhm.ac.uk

The image of Sir Joseph Banks appears on http://www.plantexplorers.com

Note: The Kite Runner was WINNER of the South African Boeke Prize in 2004. It was also VOTED the Reading Group Book of the Year for 2006 and 2007.

“I became what I am today at the age of twelve, on a frigid, overcast day in the winter of 1975,”  Amir, in the opening lines.

A successful novelist now living in Fremont, California, Amir receives a phone call from his father’s former business partner, Rahim Khan, now in Pakistan. Rahim had stayed behind in Afghanistan when Amir and his father escaped to America in 1981, and he is now dying. An intimate part of the family, Rahim has long been aware of a childhood betrayal committed by Amir, one which had catastrophic consequences for others and which has tormented Amir for his entire life. “There is a way to be good again,” Rahim Shah tells him, and Amir immediately sets off for Pakistan to see him for the last time.

In flashbacks, Hosseini recreates the day-to-day existence of Amir and his father, a highly successful merchant in Kabul in the 1970’s, creating a warm and emotionally involving story of childhood and its traumas and stressing the importance of family in times of trouble, as he follows the lives of Amir and his father until Amir is in his late thirties. But this is more than the story of Amir and Baba. It is also the parallel story of Hassan and Ali, their servants, who represent an entirely different world. Amir and Baba are Pashtuns, while Hassan and Ali are Hazaras, descendants of the Moguls who are also Shi’a Muslims, and it is in these parallel tracks that we come to see the variety of life in Afghanistan, its mores, traditions, and its hierarchies.

As infants, Amir and Hassan share the same wet nurse, both boys having lost their mothers within a week of their births, and this shared experience proves to be prophetic of their close relationship. Just as Baba and Ali have been closer than most masters and servants, Amir and Hassan grow up together, are best friends, and even get into trouble together. Hassan, however, always knows he is Amir’s servant, and he is often cruelly mocked by others who consider him inferior because of his ethnicity, his Mongoloid features, and his unrepaired hare-lip.

The best “kite runner” in Kabul, Hassan is often first on the scene to capture prized kites when their lines are cut during kite-flying competitions, a huge spectator sport in Kabul. During one of these competitions in which Amir is participating, Hassan captures a particularly prized trophy. Emerging from an alley, he finds himself confronted by several fierce bullies, and when he refuses to give in to them and hand over the trophy kite, he is beaten, tortured, and severely injured. Amir, chancing upon the scene in time to prevent some of the damage, runs away in fear instead, setting up a series of betrayals which cause him pain throughout his life.

Six years later, after a Communist coup in Afghanistan, Baba uses his wealth and connections to escape with Amir to Pakistan and eventually the United States, where he works in a gas station, and on weekends sells goods at a public flea market so that Amir can go to college. In this middle section of the book, the relationship between Amir and his father changes dramatically. Away from the roles demanded of them in Kabul, they are on a more equal footing as they explore their new lives in America. Remaining part of the close Afghan community where they live, they maintain traditions and values in their relationships with other Afghans, while finding their new roles in America.  When, twenty years after leaving Kabul, Amir gets his call from Rahim Khan, he returns to Pakistan and eventually to Afghanistan, where he has a chance to relive circumstances similar to those in which, many years before, he betrayed Hassan, this time discovering a way to “be good again.”

Hosseini’s narrative is fast-paced, and his sensitive portrayal of childhood with all its fears and tensions is particularly striking. The glimpses of Afghan family life and values are captivating, particularly because they have been virtually unknown in American fiction, but it is the author’s focus on the humanity of the characters that gives the novel its universality and great appeal. Hassan’s nobility in the face of his trauma, born from both his unwavering acceptance of his role as a servant and his genuine affection for Amir, gives him a saintly aspect which never cloys.  Baba is almost larger than life, and though he never knows exactly what it is that Amir has done, he is sensitive enough to be disturbed by it when it occurs, especially since he fears that it may signal weakness. It is only much later that Amir discovers that Baba, too, has kept some secrets.

Afghan cultural traditions, which stress pride, honor, and a sense of hospitality toward strangers, add color to this narrative, and when scenes involving the Taliban are presented in the last part of the book, the true horror of their repression of a living culture, in addition to their repression of individuals, becomes obvious. By following two families, one in the U.S. and one in Afghanistan, the contrast becomes even clearer.

This dual focus, however, creates a few structural problems as the author tries to figure out a way to connect all his characters. Relying heavily on coincidence (and in the case of  the diplomatic officials, on stereotypes), he ties up the loose ends and resolves the conflicts.  Some of the coincidences are not necessary and do not advance the story line, however–Amir’s meeting an old beggar, who turns out to have been a university teacher who knew Amir’s mother as a young woman, for example. Despite some narrative clumsiness, however, the novel is a moving, dramatic, personal, and compelling read, fascinating in its setting and in its development of the father-son relationship. I was totally engaged by its characters–and by its considerable charm.

Notes:  The author’s photo appears on http://www.purdue.edu.

A family leaving for a kite-flying contest appears on http://ncowie.wordpress.com

The map of Afghanistan is from http://commons.wikimedia.org

“You can only do. Or be, sort of.”

If prizes were given for the most nauseating cover for a novel of literary fiction, this would be at the top of my list.

In his longest novel, written in 1970, Nobel Prize-winning Australian author Patrick White examines the question of an artist’s creativity, where it comes from, whether it can be controlled, and what obligations, if any, accompany it. As he traces the life of Hurtle Duffield from the age of four until his death as an elderly (and successful) avant-garde artist, we see Duffield always as somehow different from his peers.

The son of a laundress and a bottle collector, Hurtle is from birth inspired, painting large images on walls as a toddler, but he recognizes at an early age that “people look down at their plates if you said something was ‘beautiful.'” To provide him with opportunities which will allow his genius to flourish, his parents sell him, when he is four years old, to the wealthy family for which his mother works.

As a member of the Courtney family, Hurtle travels and becomes educated, though he continues to see rather than think. For him, the usual emotional traumas of adolescence are accompanied by unique questions of his identity, both because of his two families and also because of his view of the world. Not religious, he sees God as the Great Vivisector, and men treating each other as animals, slaughtering each other in war.

When he himself goes off to war and returns to find that the family has gone in separate directions, he devotes himself, once again, to his art, using women who love him as vehicles for his own self-expression and behaving as a vivisector himself. About his painting of one model, White says “[Hurtle] disemboweled her while she was still alive.” As time passes, Hurtle continues to search for love, inspiration, self-expression, and some sort of balance in his life between his immense need to paint, his desire for personal connection, and his simultaneous need to be alone.

White’s prose style is direct and concise, elegantly simple, and easy to understand. He uses colloquial speech–words like “smoodge,” “sook,” “slommacky,” and “mumped,” which must be understood from context–and reveals character and action through dialogue. The novel is old-fashioned, using a straight chronological narrative with no complex flashbacks, and it is quite romantic in its plot elements, despite its serious theme development. The biggest problem for the reader is that the main character is not very likable, nor does he inspire a great deal of empathy – a difficult character to live with for approximately six hundred pages – and I’m not sure how typical he is of the artists he is supposed to represent.

Note: If prizes were given for the most nauseating cover for a novel of literary fiction, this would be at the top of the list.

The author’s photo is from http://radaris.com

Also by Patrick White:  RIDERS IN THE CHARIOT ,    VOSS, and    THE HANGING GARDEN

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »